Message ID | 20200106224122.3231-3-sushmax.kalakota@intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | New VMD Device ids | expand |
On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:41:22PM -0700, Sushma Kalakota wrote: > This patch adds support for this VMD device which supports the bus > restriction mode. Suggested rephrasing to an imperative voice: Add new VMD device IDs that require the bus restriction mode. > Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com> > Signed-off-by: Sushma Kalakota <sushmax.kalakota@intel.com> The first sign-off should be the author, but there's no "From:" header line for Jon. Is the attribution correct? > @@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id vmd_ids[] = { > {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C0), > .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW | > VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_467F), > + .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, > {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_4C3D), > .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, Since you know all the new device ids, might as well collapse this patch with the first one from this series.
Thanks Keith, On Tue, 2020-01-07 at 12:13 -0700, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 03:41:22PM -0700, Sushma Kalakota wrote: > > This patch adds support for this VMD device which supports the bus > > restriction mode. > > Suggested rephrasing to an imperative voice: > > Add new VMD device IDs that require the bus restriction mode. > Sure > > Signed-off-by: Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Sushma Kalakota <sushmax.kalakota@intel.com> > > The first sign-off should be the author, but there's no "From:" header > line for Jon. Is the attribution correct? We both worked on this, though it was primarily Sushma. We'll switch the attribution order per https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.17/process/submitting-patches.html#sign-your-work-the-developer-s-certificate-of-origin > > > @@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id vmd_ids[] = { > > {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C0), > > .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW | > > VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, > > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_467F), > > + .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, > > {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_4C3D), > > .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, > > Since you know all the new device ids, might as well collapse this patch > with the first one from this series. Sure
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c index 2b192e72f550..9433bd387fdd 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/vmd.c @@ -868,6 +868,8 @@ static const struct pci_device_id vmd_ids[] = { {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_28C0), .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_MEMBAR_SHADOW | VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_467F), + .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_4C3D), .driver_data = VMD_FEAT_HAS_BUS_RESTRICTIONS,}, {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_9A0B), diff --git a/include/linux/pci_ids.h b/include/linux/pci_ids.h index 8b3bc4b545b9..aac007c60f87 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci_ids.h +++ b/include/linux/pci_ids.h @@ -2957,6 +2957,7 @@ #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_BR 0x3cf5 /* 13.6 */ #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_SBRIDGE_SAD1 0x3cf6 /* 12.7 */ #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_IOAT_SNB 0x402f +#define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_467F 0x467f #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_VMD_4C3D 0x4c3d #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5100_16 0x65f0 #define PCI_DEVICE_ID_INTEL_5100_19 0x65f3