| Message ID | 20210303182219.1631042-3-philmd@redhat.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | accel: Introduce AccelvCPUState opaque structure | expand |
On 03/03/2021 19.22, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: > We already have the 'run' variable holding 'cs->kvm_run' value. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > --- > target/s390x/kvm.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c > index 7a892d663df..73f816a7222 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c > @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu) > int icpt_code = run->s390_sieic.icptcode; > int r = 0; > > - DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, > - (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr); > + DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, (long)run->psw_addr); > switch (icpt_code) { > case ICPT_INSTRUCTION: > case ICPT_PV_INSTR: > Reviewed-by: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 19:22:02 +0100 Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> wrote: > We already have the 'run' variable holding 'cs->kvm_run' value. > > Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> > --- > target/s390x/kvm.c | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c > index 7a892d663df..73f816a7222 100644 > --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c > +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c > @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu) > int icpt_code = run->s390_sieic.icptcode; > int r = 0; > > - DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, > - (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr); > + DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, (long)run->psw_addr); > switch (icpt_code) { > case ICPT_INSTRUCTION: > case ICPT_PV_INSTR: Thanks, queued this one to s390-next.
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c index 7a892d663df..73f816a7222 100644 --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c @@ -1785,8 +1785,7 @@ static int handle_intercept(S390CPU *cpu) int icpt_code = run->s390_sieic.icptcode; int r = 0; - DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, - (long)cs->kvm_run->psw_addr); + DPRINTF("intercept: 0x%x (at 0x%lx)\n", icpt_code, (long)run->psw_addr); switch (icpt_code) { case ICPT_INSTRUCTION: case ICPT_PV_INSTR:
We already have the 'run' variable holding 'cs->kvm_run' value. Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@redhat.com> --- target/s390x/kvm.c | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)