diff mbox series

[v2,06/10] mmc: sdhci-of-aspeed: Remove some unnecessary casts from KUnit tests

Message ID 20210513193204.816681-6-davidgow@google.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Headers show
Series [v2,01/10] kunit: Do not typecheck binary assertions | expand

Commit Message

David Gow May 13, 2021, 7:32 p.m. UTC
With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly,
get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.

Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
---
This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.

 drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++-------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

Comments

Andrew Jeffery May 14, 2021, 1:55 a.m. UTC | #1
On Fri, 14 May 2021, at 05:02, David Gow wrote:
> With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly,
> get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
> 
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
> ---
> This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
> first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
> the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
> particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.

No, happy to have that cleaned up.

Thanks David.

Acked-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@aj.id.au>
Ulf Hansson May 17, 2021, 9:22 a.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 21:36, David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly,
> get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

I guess you will funnel this via another tree than the mmc?

Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>

Kind regards
Uffe

> ---
> This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
> first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
> the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
> particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
>
>  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++-------------
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test)
>         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
>
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));
>  }
>
> @@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test)
>         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
>
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
> -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
>                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));
>  }
>
> --
> 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
>
David Gow May 18, 2021, 4:29 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 13 May 2021 at 21:36, David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly,
> > get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>
>
> I guess you will funnel this via another tree than the mmc?
>
> Acked-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
>
> Kind regards
> Uffe
>

Yeah: the plan is to have this whole series go through the
kselftest/kunit tree so we don't have to worry about potentially
temporarily introducing a bunch of compiler warnings.

Cheers,
-- David

> > ---
> > This should be a no-op functionality wise, and while it depends on the
> > first couple of patches in this series, it's otherwise independent from
> > the others. I think this makes the test more readable, but if you
> > particularly dislike it, I'm happy to drop it.
> >
> >  drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c | 34 ++++++++++++-------------
> >  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> > index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> > +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
> > @@ -26,23 +26,23 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test)
> >         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
> >
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));
> >  }
> >
> > @@ -67,21 +67,21 @@ static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test)
> >         KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
> >
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
> > -       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> > +       KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
> >                         aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));
> >  }
> >
> > --
> > 2.31.1.751.gd2f1c929bd-goog
> >
Brendan Higgins June 15, 2021, 8:16 p.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 12:36 PM David Gow <davidgow@google.com> wrote:
>
> With KUnit's EXPECT macros no longer typechecking arguments as strictly,
> get rid of a number of now unnecessary casts.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Gow <davidgow@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
index bb67d159b7d8..1ed4f86291f2 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-aspeed-test.c
@@ -26,23 +26,23 @@  static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_ddr52(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 25));
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 0,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 181));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 182));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 183));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 2,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 184));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 3,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 203));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 204));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 205));
 }
 
@@ -67,21 +67,21 @@  static void aspeed_sdhci_phase_hs200(struct kunit *test)
 	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 96));
 
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 180));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 185));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 186));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 1,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 187));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 14,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 269));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 270));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 271));
-	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, (int)ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
+	KUNIT_EXPECT_EQ(test, ASPEED_SDHCI_TAP_PARAM_INVERT_CLK | 15,
 			aspeed_sdhci_phase_to_tap(NULL, rate, 276));
 }