Message ID | 1622008161-41451-3-git-send-email-guoren@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | riscv: Fixup asid_allocator remaining issues | expand |
On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:49:21AM +0000, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > Use static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator) to keep the origin > tlb flush style, so it's no effect on the existing machine. Here > are the optimized functions: > - flush_tlb_mm > - flush_tlb_page > - flush_tlb_range > > All above are based on the below new implement functions: > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid > - local_flush_tlb_range_asid > > These functions are based on ASID instead of previous non-ASID > tlb_flush implementation which invalidates more useful tlb > entries. I still think the commit message is incomplete and rather misleading. Here is what I'd come up with from reading the patch: --------- Subject: add ASID-based tlbflushing methods Implement optimized version of the tlb flushing routines for systems using ASIDs. These are behind the use_asid_allocator static branch to not affect existing systems not using ASIDs. --------- > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, > + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) > +{ > + unsigned long tmp, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); > + > + for (tmp = start & PAGE_MASK; tmp < end; tmp += PAGE_SIZE) { > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" > + : > + : "r" (tmp), "r" (asid) > + : "memory"); > + tmp += PAGE_SIZE; > + } This double increments tmp. Also the non-ASID code switches to a global flush once flushing more than a single page. It might be worth documenting the tradeoff in the code. > +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(struct cpumask *cmask, > + unsigned long start, > + unsigned long size, > + unsigned long asid) > +{ I don't think the calling conventions here are optimal. I'd pass the mm_struct as the first argument, as we can derive both the cpumask and asid from it instead of doing that in the callers. But more importantly I think the static branch check can be moved deeper into the code to avoid a lot of duplication. What do you think of this version? diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h index b0659413a080..7030837adc1a 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, return 0; } +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); + #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c index 68aa312fc352..45c1b04b105d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_MMU -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); static unsigned long asid_bits; static unsigned long num_asids; diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c index 720b443c4528..d8afbb1269d5 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c @@ -4,6 +4,33 @@ #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <asm/sbi.h> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> + +static inline void local_flush_tlb_all_asid(unsigned long asid) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma x0, %0" + : + : "r" (asid) + : "memory"); +} + +static inline void local_flush_tlb_page_asid(unsigned long addr, + unsigned long asid) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" + : + : "r" (addr), "r" (asid) + : "memory"); +} + +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) +{ + unsigned long addr, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); + + for (addr = start & PAGE_MASK; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) + local_flush_tlb_page_asid(addr, asid); +} void flush_tlb_all(void) { @@ -12,28 +39,43 @@ void flush_tlb_all(void) /* * This function must not be called with cmask being null. - * Kernel may panic if cmask is NULL. */ -static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, unsigned long size) { + struct cpumask *cmask = mm_cpumask(mm); struct cpumask hmask; unsigned int cpuid; + bool broadcast; if (cpumask_empty(cmask)) return; cpuid = get_cpu(); + /* check if the tlbflush needs to be sent to other CPUs */ + broadcast = cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) < nr_cpu_ids; + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) { + unsigned long asid = atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id); - if (cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) >= nr_cpu_ids) { - /* local cpu is the only cpu present in cpumask */ - if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) + if (broadcast) { + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); + sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(cpumask_bits(&hmask), + start, size, asid); + } else if (size != -1) { + local_flush_tlb_range_asid(start, size, asid); + } else { + local_flush_tlb_all_asid(asid); + } + } else { + if (broadcast) { + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), + start, size); + } else if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) { local_flush_tlb_page(start); - else + } else { local_flush_tlb_all(); - } else { - riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); - sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), start, size); + } } put_cpu(); @@ -41,16 +83,16 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) { - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1); + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm, 0, -1); } void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) { - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE); + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, addr, PAGE_SIZE); } void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) { - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start); + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end - start); }
On Thu, 27 May 2021 00:09:03 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:49:21AM +0000, guoren@kernel.org wrote: >> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> >> >> Use static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator) to keep the origin >> tlb flush style, so it's no effect on the existing machine. Here >> are the optimized functions: >> - flush_tlb_mm >> - flush_tlb_page >> - flush_tlb_range >> >> All above are based on the below new implement functions: >> - __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid >> - local_flush_tlb_range_asid >> >> These functions are based on ASID instead of previous non-ASID >> tlb_flush implementation which invalidates more useful tlb >> entries. > > I still think the commit message is incomplete and rather misleading. > Here is what I'd come up with from reading the patch: > > --------- > Subject: add ASID-based tlbflushing methods > > Implement optimized version of the tlb flushing routines for systems > using ASIDs. These are behind the use_asid_allocator static branch to > not affect existing systems not using ASIDs. > --------- That seems much better, thanks. >> +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, >> + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) >> +{ >> + unsigned long tmp, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); >> + >> + for (tmp = start & PAGE_MASK; tmp < end; tmp += PAGE_SIZE) { >> + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" >> + : >> + : "r" (tmp), "r" (asid) >> + : "memory"); >> + tmp += PAGE_SIZE; >> + } > > This double increments tmp. > > Also the non-ASID code switches to a global flush once flushing more > than a single page. It might be worth documenting the tradeoff in the > code. For some reason I thought we'd written this down in the commentary of teh ISA manual as the suggested huersitic here, but I can't find it so maybe I'm wrong. If it's actually there it would be good to point that out, otherwise some documentation seems fine as it'll probably become a tunable at some point anyway. >> +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(struct cpumask *cmask, >> + unsigned long start, >> + unsigned long size, >> + unsigned long asid) >> +{ > > I don't think the calling conventions here are optimal. I'd pass > the mm_struct as the first argument, as we can derive both the cpumask > and asid from it instead of doing that in the callers. > > But more importantly I think the static branch check can be moved deeper > into the code to avoid a lot of duplication. What do you think of this > version? > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > index b0659413a080..7030837adc1a 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, > return 0; > } > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > + > #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */ > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > index 68aa312fc352..45c1b04b105d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > > static unsigned long asid_bits; > static unsigned long num_asids; > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > index 720b443c4528..d8afbb1269d5 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > @@ -4,6 +4,33 @@ > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <asm/sbi.h> > +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> > + > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_all_asid(unsigned long asid) > +{ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma x0, %0" > + : > + : "r" (asid) > + : "memory"); > +} > + > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_page_asid(unsigned long addr, > + unsigned long asid) > +{ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" > + : > + : "r" (addr), "r" (asid) > + : "memory"); > +} > + > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, > + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) > +{ > + unsigned long addr, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); > + > + for (addr = start & PAGE_MASK; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) > + local_flush_tlb_page_asid(addr, asid); > +} > > void flush_tlb_all(void) > { > @@ -12,28 +39,43 @@ void flush_tlb_all(void) > > /* > * This function must not be called with cmask being null. > - * Kernel may panic if cmask is NULL. > */ > -static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, > +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, > unsigned long size) > { > + struct cpumask *cmask = mm_cpumask(mm); > struct cpumask hmask; > unsigned int cpuid; > + bool broadcast; > > if (cpumask_empty(cmask)) > return; > > cpuid = get_cpu(); > + /* check if the tlbflush needs to be sent to other CPUs */ > + broadcast = cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) < nr_cpu_ids; > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) { > + unsigned long asid = atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id); > > - if (cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) >= nr_cpu_ids) { > - /* local cpu is the only cpu present in cpumask */ > - if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) > + if (broadcast) { > + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > + sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(cpumask_bits(&hmask), > + start, size, asid); > + } else if (size != -1) { > + local_flush_tlb_range_asid(start, size, asid); > + } else { > + local_flush_tlb_all_asid(asid); > + } > + } else { > + if (broadcast) { > + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), > + start, size); > + } else if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) { > local_flush_tlb_page(start); > - else > + } else { > local_flush_tlb_all(); > - } else { > - riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > - sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), start, size); > + } > } > > put_cpu(); > @@ -41,16 +83,16 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, > > void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1); > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm, 0, -1); > } > > void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) > { > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE); > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, addr, PAGE_SIZE); > } > > void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, > unsigned long end) > { > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start); > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end - start); > } LGTM. I took the first one as IMO they're really distnict issues, LMK if you want to re-spin this one or if I should just take what's here.
On Thu, May 27, 2021 at 3:09 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:49:21AM +0000, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > > From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > > > > Use static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator) to keep the origin > > tlb flush style, so it's no effect on the existing machine. Here > > are the optimized functions: > > - flush_tlb_mm > > - flush_tlb_page > > - flush_tlb_range > > > > All above are based on the below new implement functions: > > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid > > - local_flush_tlb_range_asid > > > > These functions are based on ASID instead of previous non-ASID > > tlb_flush implementation which invalidates more useful tlb > > entries. > > I still think the commit message is incomplete and rather misleading. > Here is what I'd come up with from reading the patch: > > --------- > Subject: add ASID-based tlbflushing methods > > Implement optimized version of the tlb flushing routines for systems > using ASIDs. These are behind the use_asid_allocator static branch to > not affect existing systems not using ASIDs. > --------- > > > > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, > > + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) > > +{ > > + unsigned long tmp, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); > > + > > + for (tmp = start & PAGE_MASK; tmp < end; tmp += PAGE_SIZE) { > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" > > + : > > + : "r" (tmp), "r" (asid) > > + : "memory"); > > + tmp += PAGE_SIZE; > > + } > > This double increments tmp. Yes, It's a bug for PATCH V4. Thx for point it out. > > Also the non-ASID code switches to a global flush once flushing more > than a single page. It might be worth documenting the tradeoff in the > code. > > > +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(struct cpumask *cmask, > > + unsigned long start, > > + unsigned long size, > > + unsigned long asid) > > +{ > > I don't think the calling conventions here are optimal. I'd pass > the mm_struct as the first argument, as we can derive both the cpumask > and asid from it instead of doing that in the callers. > > But more importantly I think the static branch check can be moved deeper > into the code to avoid a lot of duplication. What do you think of this > version? Good idea, but I think "Modifying infrastructure and Adding ASID TLB flush" should be separated. I'll try in the next PATCH version. > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > index b0659413a080..7030837adc1a 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, > return 0; > } > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > + > #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */ > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > index 68aa312fc352..45c1b04b105d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > > static unsigned long asid_bits; > static unsigned long num_asids; > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > index 720b443c4528..d8afbb1269d5 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > @@ -4,6 +4,33 @@ > #include <linux/smp.h> > #include <linux/sched.h> > #include <asm/sbi.h> > +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> > + > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_all_asid(unsigned long asid) > +{ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma x0, %0" > + : > + : "r" (asid) > + : "memory"); > +} > + > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_page_asid(unsigned long addr, > + unsigned long asid) > +{ > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" > + : > + : "r" (addr), "r" (asid) > + : "memory"); > +} > + > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, > + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) > +{ > + unsigned long addr, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); > + > + for (addr = start & PAGE_MASK; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) > + local_flush_tlb_page_asid(addr, asid); > +} > > void flush_tlb_all(void) > { > @@ -12,28 +39,43 @@ void flush_tlb_all(void) > > /* > * This function must not be called with cmask being null. > - * Kernel may panic if cmask is NULL. > */ > -static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, > +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, > unsigned long size) > { > + struct cpumask *cmask = mm_cpumask(mm); > struct cpumask hmask; > unsigned int cpuid; > + bool broadcast; > > if (cpumask_empty(cmask)) > return; > > cpuid = get_cpu(); > + /* check if the tlbflush needs to be sent to other CPUs */ > + broadcast = cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) < nr_cpu_ids; > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) { > + unsigned long asid = atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id); > > - if (cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) >= nr_cpu_ids) { > - /* local cpu is the only cpu present in cpumask */ > - if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) > + if (broadcast) { > + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > + sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(cpumask_bits(&hmask), > + start, size, asid); > + } else if (size != -1) { > + local_flush_tlb_range_asid(start, size, asid); > + } else { > + local_flush_tlb_all_asid(asid); > + } > + } else { > + if (broadcast) { > + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), > + start, size); > + } else if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) { > local_flush_tlb_page(start); > - else > + } else { > local_flush_tlb_all(); > - } else { > - riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > - sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), start, size); > + } > } > > put_cpu(); > @@ -41,16 +83,16 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, > > void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) > { > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1); > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm, 0, -1); > } > > void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) > { > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE); > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, addr, PAGE_SIZE); > } > > void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, > unsigned long end) > { > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start); > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end - start); > }
On Sun, May 30, 2021 at 7:42 AM <palmerdabbelt@google.com> wrote: > > On Thu, 27 May 2021 00:09:03 PDT (-0700), Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Wed, May 26, 2021 at 05:49:21AM +0000, guoren@kernel.org wrote: > >> From: Guo Ren <guoren@linux.alibaba.com> > >> > >> Use static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator) to keep the origin > >> tlb flush style, so it's no effect on the existing machine. Here > >> are the optimized functions: > >> - flush_tlb_mm > >> - flush_tlb_page > >> - flush_tlb_range > >> > >> All above are based on the below new implement functions: > >> - __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid > >> - local_flush_tlb_range_asid > >> > >> These functions are based on ASID instead of previous non-ASID > >> tlb_flush implementation which invalidates more useful tlb > >> entries. > > > > I still think the commit message is incomplete and rather misleading. > > Here is what I'd come up with from reading the patch: > > > > --------- > > Subject: add ASID-based tlbflushing methods > > > > Implement optimized version of the tlb flushing routines for systems > > using ASIDs. These are behind the use_asid_allocator static branch to > > not affect existing systems not using ASIDs. > > --------- > > That seems much better, thanks. > > >> +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, > >> + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) > >> +{ > >> + unsigned long tmp, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); > >> + > >> + for (tmp = start & PAGE_MASK; tmp < end; tmp += PAGE_SIZE) { > >> + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" > >> + : > >> + : "r" (tmp), "r" (asid) > >> + : "memory"); > >> + tmp += PAGE_SIZE; > >> + } > > > > This double increments tmp. > > > > Also the non-ASID code switches to a global flush once flushing more > > than a single page. It might be worth documenting the tradeoff in the > > code. > > For some reason I thought we'd written this down in the commentary of > teh ISA manual as the suggested huersitic here, but I can't find it so > maybe I'm wrong. If it's actually there it would be good to point that > out, otherwise some documentation seems fine as it'll probably become a > tunable at some point anyway. From my view: "non-ASID code switches to a global flush all" is a hardware bug fixup, so I just reserved it to prevent breaking other machines. The comment for the "non-ASID code" should be another patch. > > >> +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(struct cpumask *cmask, > >> + unsigned long start, > >> + unsigned long size, > >> + unsigned long asid) > >> +{ > > > > I don't think the calling conventions here are optimal. I'd pass > > the mm_struct as the first argument, as we can derive both the cpumask > > and asid from it instead of doing that in the callers. > > > > But more importantly I think the static branch check can be moved deeper > > into the code to avoid a lot of duplication. What do you think of this > > version? > > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > index b0659413a080..7030837adc1a 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h > > @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, > > return 0; > > } > > > > +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > > + > > #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> > > > > #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */ > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > > index 68aa312fc352..45c1b04b105d 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c > > @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ > > > > #ifdef CONFIG_MMU > > > > -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > > +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); > > > > static unsigned long asid_bits; > > static unsigned long num_asids; > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > > index 720b443c4528..d8afbb1269d5 100644 > > --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > > +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c > > @@ -4,6 +4,33 @@ > > #include <linux/smp.h> > > #include <linux/sched.h> > > #include <asm/sbi.h> > > +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> > > + > > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_all_asid(unsigned long asid) > > +{ > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma x0, %0" > > + : > > + : "r" (asid) > > + : "memory"); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_page_asid(unsigned long addr, > > + unsigned long asid) > > +{ > > + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" > > + : > > + : "r" (addr), "r" (asid) > > + : "memory"); > > +} > > + > > +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, > > + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) > > +{ > > + unsigned long addr, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); > > + > > + for (addr = start & PAGE_MASK; addr < end; addr += PAGE_SIZE) > > + local_flush_tlb_page_asid(addr, asid); > > +} > > > > void flush_tlb_all(void) > > { > > @@ -12,28 +39,43 @@ void flush_tlb_all(void) > > > > /* > > * This function must not be called with cmask being null. > > - * Kernel may panic if cmask is NULL. > > */ > > -static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, > > +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long start, > > unsigned long size) > > { > > + struct cpumask *cmask = mm_cpumask(mm); > > struct cpumask hmask; > > unsigned int cpuid; > > + bool broadcast; > > > > if (cpumask_empty(cmask)) > > return; > > > > cpuid = get_cpu(); > > + /* check if the tlbflush needs to be sent to other CPUs */ > > + broadcast = cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) < nr_cpu_ids; > > + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) { > > + unsigned long asid = atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id); > > > > - if (cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) >= nr_cpu_ids) { > > - /* local cpu is the only cpu present in cpumask */ > > - if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) > > + if (broadcast) { > > + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > > + sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(cpumask_bits(&hmask), > > + start, size, asid); > > + } else if (size != -1) { > > + local_flush_tlb_range_asid(start, size, asid); > > + } else { > > + local_flush_tlb_all_asid(asid); > > + } > > + } else { > > + if (broadcast) { > > + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > > + sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), > > + start, size); > > + } else if (size <= PAGE_SIZE) { > > local_flush_tlb_page(start); > > - else > > + } else { > > local_flush_tlb_all(); > > - } else { > > - riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); > > - sbi_remote_sfence_vma(cpumask_bits(&hmask), start, size); > > + } > > } > > > > put_cpu(); > > @@ -41,16 +83,16 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, > > > > void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) > > { > > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1); > > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm, 0, -1); > > } > > > > void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) > > { > > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE); > > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, addr, PAGE_SIZE); > > } > > > > void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, > > unsigned long end) > > { > > - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start); > > + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(vma->vm_mm, start, end - start); > > } > > LGTM. I took the first one as IMO they're really distnict issues, LMK > if you want to re-spin this one or if I should just take what's here.
On Sat, May 29, 2021 at 04:42:37PM -0700, palmerdabbelt@google.com wrote: >> >> Also the non-ASID code switches to a global flush once flushing more >> than a single page. It might be worth documenting the tradeoff in the >> code. > > For some reason I thought we'd written this down in the commentary of teh > ISA manual as the suggested huersitic here, but I can't find it so maybe > I'm wrong. If it's actually there it would be good to point that out, > otherwise some documentation seems fine as it'll probably become a tunable > at some point anyway. The real question is why is the heuristic different for the ASID vs non-ASID case? I think that really need a comment. > LGTM. I took the first one as IMO they're really distnict issues, LMK if > you want to re-spin this one or if I should just take what's here. What distinct issue? The fact that the new code is buggy and uses rather non-optimal calling conventions?
diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h index b065941..7030837 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/mmu_context.h @@ -33,6 +33,8 @@ static inline int init_new_context(struct task_struct *tsk, return 0; } +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); + #include <asm-generic/mmu_context.h> #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_MMU_CONTEXT_H */ diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h index c84218a..cee476b 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/tlbflush.h @@ -22,9 +22,32 @@ static inline void local_flush_tlb_page(unsigned long addr) { ALT_FLUSH_TLB_PAGE(__asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0" : : "r" (addr) : "memory")); } + +static inline void local_flush_tlb_all_asid(unsigned long asid) +{ + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma x0, %0" + : + : "r" (asid) + : "memory"); +} + +static inline void local_flush_tlb_range_asid(unsigned long start, + unsigned long size, unsigned long asid) +{ + unsigned long tmp, end = ALIGN(start + size, PAGE_SIZE); + + for (tmp = start & PAGE_MASK; tmp < end; tmp += PAGE_SIZE) { + __asm__ __volatile__ ("sfence.vma %0, %1" + : + : "r" (tmp), "r" (asid) + : "memory"); + tmp += PAGE_SIZE; + } +} #else /* CONFIG_MMU */ #define local_flush_tlb_all() do { } while (0) #define local_flush_tlb_page(addr) do { } while (0) +#define local_flush_tlb_range_asid(addr) do { } while (0) #endif /* CONFIG_MMU */ #if defined(CONFIG_SMP) && defined(CONFIG_MMU) diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c index 68aa312..45c1b04 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/context.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/context.c @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ #ifdef CONFIG_MMU -static DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(use_asid_allocator); static unsigned long asid_bits; static unsigned long num_asids; diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c index 720b443..87b4e52 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ #include <linux/smp.h> #include <linux/sched.h> #include <asm/sbi.h> +#include <asm/mmu_context.h> void flush_tlb_all(void) { @@ -39,18 +40,57 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start, put_cpu(); } +static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(struct cpumask *cmask, + unsigned long start, + unsigned long size, + unsigned long asid) +{ + struct cpumask hmask; + unsigned int cpuid; + + if (cpumask_empty(cmask)) + return; + + cpuid = get_cpu(); + + if (cpumask_any_but(cmask, cpuid) >= nr_cpu_ids) { + if (size == -1) + local_flush_tlb_all_asid(asid); + else + local_flush_tlb_range_asid(start, size, asid); + } else { + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask); + sbi_remote_sfence_vma_asid(cpumask_bits(&hmask), + start, size, asid); + } + + put_cpu(); +} + void flush_tlb_mm(struct mm_struct *mm) { - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1); + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) + __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1, + atomic_long_read(&mm->context.id)); + else + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(mm), 0, -1); } void flush_tlb_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr) { - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE); + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) + __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE, + atomic_long_read(&vma->vm_mm->context.id)); + else + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), addr, PAGE_SIZE); } void flush_tlb_range(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end) { - __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start); + if (static_branch_unlikely(&use_asid_allocator)) + __sbi_tlb_flush_range_asid(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start, + atomic_long_read(&vma->vm_mm->context.id)); + else + __sbi_tlb_flush_range(mm_cpumask(vma->vm_mm), start, end - start); }