Message ID | 1627525163-1683-1-git-send-email-liangwenpeng@huawei.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | RDMA/hns: Add support for Dynamic Context Attachment | expand |
On 2021/7/29 10:19, Wenpeng Liang wrote: > The HIP09 introduces the DCA(Dynamic Context Attachment) feature which > supports many RC QPs to share the WQE buffer in a memory pool. If a QP > enables DCA feature, the WQE's buffer will not be allocated when creating > but when the users start to post WRs. This will reduce the memory > consumption when there are too many QPs are inactive. > > The related userspace series is named "libhns: Add support for Dynamic Context Attachment". Hi Does anyone have an opinion about this patchset, thanks!
On 2021/7/29 10:19, Wenpeng Liang wrote: > The HIP09 introduces the DCA(Dynamic Context Attachment) feature which > supports many RC QPs to share the WQE buffer in a memory pool. If a QP > enables DCA feature, the WQE's buffer will not be allocated when creating > but when the users start to post WRs. This will reduce the memory > consumption when there are too many QPs are inactive. Hi, Jason. The comments of v4 have not been fixed yet, but the jgg-for-next branch has already applied this patchset, should I send v5 or send a fix? Thanks, Wenpeng
On Sat, Aug 21, 2021 at 05:34:48PM +0800, Wenpeng Liang wrote: > > > On 2021/7/29 10:19, Wenpeng Liang wrote: > > The HIP09 introduces the DCA(Dynamic Context Attachment) feature which > > supports many RC QPs to share the WQE buffer in a memory pool. If a QP > > enables DCA feature, the WQE's buffer will not be allocated when creating > > but when the users start to post WRs. This will reduce the memory > > consumption when there are too many QPs are inactive. > > Hi, Jason. > The comments of v4 have not been fixed yet, but the jgg-for-next branch has > already applied this patchset, should I send v5 or send a fix? Oh, I made a mistake, I've fixed the branches, thanks for noticing Jason