Message ID | YXEJey8lKksAZif4@ns.kevlo.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | c6477cb237048725922f6a786f68b5232abb418f |
Delegated to: | Kalle Valo |
Headers | show |
Series | [wireless-drivers-next] rtw89: fix return value in hfc_pub_cfg_chk | expand |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org> > Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2021 2:32 PM > To: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org > Cc: Pkshih <pkshih@realtek.com> > Subject: [PATCH wireless-drivers-next] rtw89: fix return value in hfc_pub_cfg_chk > > It seems to me when pub_cfg->grp0 + pub_cfg->grp1 != pub_cfg->pub_max is true, > it should return -EFAULT rather than 0. Otherwise, the function doesn't need > to exist. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org> Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > --- > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c > index 69384c43c046..afcd07ab1de7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int hfc_pub_cfg_chk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) > const struct rtw89_hfc_pub_cfg *pub_cfg = ¶m->pub_cfg; > > if (pub_cfg->grp0 + pub_cfg->grp1 != pub_cfg->pub_max) > - return 0; > + return -EFAULT; Fortunately, current checking is always equal, so it doesn't affect the result. > > return 0; > } -- Ping-Ke
Kevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org> wrote: > It seems to me when pub_cfg->grp0 + pub_cfg->grp1 != pub_cfg->pub_max is true, > it should return -EFAULT rather than 0. Otherwise, the function doesn't need > to exist. > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org> > Acked-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c > index 69384c43c046..afcd07ab1de7 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c > @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int hfc_pub_cfg_chk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) > const struct rtw89_hfc_pub_cfg *pub_cfg = ¶m->pub_cfg; > > if (pub_cfg->grp0 + pub_cfg->grp1 != pub_cfg->pub_max) > - return 0; > + return -EFAULT; > > return 0; > } Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks. c6477cb23704 rtw89: fix return value in hfc_pub_cfg_chk
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c index 69384c43c046..afcd07ab1de7 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c @@ -560,7 +560,7 @@ static int hfc_pub_cfg_chk(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) const struct rtw89_hfc_pub_cfg *pub_cfg = ¶m->pub_cfg; if (pub_cfg->grp0 + pub_cfg->grp1 != pub_cfg->pub_max) - return 0; + return -EFAULT; return 0; }
It seems to me when pub_cfg->grp0 + pub_cfg->grp1 != pub_cfg->pub_max is true, it should return -EFAULT rather than 0. Otherwise, the function doesn't need to exist. Signed-off-by: Kevin Lo <kevlo@kevlo.org> ---