diff mbox series

Revert "drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build"

Message ID 20211122135758.85444-1-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Revert "drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build" | expand

Commit Message

Tvrtko Ursulin Nov. 22, 2021, 1:57 p.m. UTC
From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>

This reverts commit 777226dac058d119286b4081953cb5aa2cb7394b.

Approach taken in the patch was rejected by Linus and the upstream tree
now already contains the required include directive via 304ac8032d3f
("Merge tag 'drm-next-2021-11-12' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm").

Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Fixes: 777226dac058 ("drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build")
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 7 -------
 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)

Comments

Matthew Auld Nov. 22, 2021, 2:04 p.m. UTC | #1
On 22/11/2021 13:57, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> 
> This reverts commit 777226dac058d119286b4081953cb5aa2cb7394b.
> 
> Approach taken in the patch was rejected by Linus and the upstream tree
> now already contains the required include directive via 304ac8032d3f
> ("Merge tag 'drm-next-2021-11-12' of git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm").
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
> Fixes: 777226dac058 ("drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build")
> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>

Acked-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>

This was copy-paste from gem/i915_gem_pm.c, does that need a similar patch?

> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 7 -------
>   1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> index f291cf4c3886..1b526039a60d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
> @@ -17,13 +17,6 @@
>   
>   MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
>   
> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
> -#include <asm/smp.h>
> -#else
> -#define wbinvd_on_all_cpus() \
> -	pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME ": Missing cache flush in %s\n", __func__)
> -#endif
> -
>   I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static bool force_different_devices;)
>   
>   static struct drm_i915_gem_object *dma_buf_to_obj(struct dma_buf *buf)
>
Tvrtko Ursulin Nov. 22, 2021, 3:31 p.m. UTC | #2
On 22/11/2021 14:04, Matthew Auld wrote:
> On 22/11/2021 13:57, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>>
>> This reverts commit 777226dac058d119286b4081953cb5aa2cb7394b.
>>
>> Approach taken in the patch was rejected by Linus and the upstream tree
>> now already contains the required include directive via 304ac8032d3f
>> ("Merge tag 'drm-next-2021-11-12' of 
>> git://anongit.freedesktop.org/drm/drm").
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
>> Fixes: 777226dac058 ("drm/i915/dmabuf: fix broken build")
>> Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
>> Cc: Thomas Hellström <thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
>> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
>> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
> 
> This was copy-paste from gem/i915_gem_pm.c, does that need a similar patch?

Personally I don't think we need to act immediately and can wait until 
the !x86 build efforts crystalize things for us a bit.

At least the commentary and commit in i915_gem_pm.c give rationale on 
pros and cons of clflush vs wbinvd. And commentary in i915_gem_dmabuf.c 
makes it sound we cannot simply go to clflush there in all cases.

Regards,

Tvrtko

> 
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 7 -------
>>   1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> index f291cf4c3886..1b526039a60d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
>> @@ -17,13 +17,6 @@
>>   MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
>> -#include <asm/smp.h>
>> -#else
>> -#define wbinvd_on_all_cpus() \
>> -    pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME ": Missing cache flush in %s\n", __func__)
>> -#endif
>> -
>>   I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static bool force_different_devices;)
>>   static struct drm_i915_gem_object *dma_buf_to_obj(struct dma_buf *buf)
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
index f291cf4c3886..1b526039a60d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c
@@ -17,13 +17,6 @@ 
 
 MODULE_IMPORT_NS(DMA_BUF);
 
-#if defined(CONFIG_X86)
-#include <asm/smp.h>
-#else
-#define wbinvd_on_all_cpus() \
-	pr_warn(DRIVER_NAME ": Missing cache flush in %s\n", __func__)
-#endif
-
 I915_SELFTEST_DECLARE(static bool force_different_devices;)
 
 static struct drm_i915_gem_object *dma_buf_to_obj(struct dma_buf *buf)