Message ID | 20211126154020.342924-2-anup.patel@wdc.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | KVM RISC-V 64-bit selftests support | expand |
On 11/26/21 16:40, Anup Patel wrote: > +static int kvm_sbi_ext_expevend_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > + struct kvm_run *run, > + unsigned long *out_val, > + struct kvm_cpu_trap *utrap, > + bool *exit) Doesn't really matter what this is used for, it's a handler that forwards. So you can name it kvm_sbi_ext_forward_handler. Paolo > +{ > + /* > + * Both SBI experimental and vendor extensions are > + * unconditionally forwarded to userspace. > + */ > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_forward(vcpu, run); > + *exit = true; > + return 0; > +} > +
On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 9:42 PM Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> wrote: > > On 11/26/21 16:40, Anup Patel wrote: > > +static int kvm_sbi_ext_expevend_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, > > + struct kvm_run *run, > > + unsigned long *out_val, > > + struct kvm_cpu_trap *utrap, > > + bool *exit) > > Doesn't really matter what this is used for, it's a handler that > forwards. So you can name it kvm_sbi_ext_forward_handler. Sure, I will rename this to kvm_sbi_ext_forward_handler() Regards, Anup > > Paolo > > > +{ > > + /* > > + * Both SBI experimental and vendor extensions are > > + * unconditionally forwarded to userspace. > > + */ > > + kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_forward(vcpu, run); > > + *exit = true; > > + return 0; > > +} > > + >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c index f62d25bc9733..78aa3db76225 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c @@ -46,6 +46,8 @@ extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_time; extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_ipi; extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_rfence; extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_hsm; +extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_experimental; +extern const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_vendor; static const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension *sbi_ext[] = { &vcpu_sbi_ext_v01, @@ -54,6 +56,8 @@ static const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension *sbi_ext[] = { &vcpu_sbi_ext_ipi, &vcpu_sbi_ext_rfence, &vcpu_sbi_ext_hsm, + &vcpu_sbi_ext_experimental, + &vcpu_sbi_ext_vendor, }; void kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_forward(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_run *run) diff --git a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c index 641015549d12..2819c325f471 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c +++ b/arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c @@ -68,3 +68,30 @@ const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_base = { .extid_end = SBI_EXT_BASE, .handler = kvm_sbi_ext_base_handler, }; + +static int kvm_sbi_ext_expevend_handler(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, + struct kvm_run *run, + unsigned long *out_val, + struct kvm_cpu_trap *utrap, + bool *exit) +{ + /* + * Both SBI experimental and vendor extensions are + * unconditionally forwarded to userspace. + */ + kvm_riscv_vcpu_sbi_forward(vcpu, run); + *exit = true; + return 0; +} + +const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_experimental = { + .extid_start = SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_START, + .extid_end = SBI_EXT_EXPERIMENTAL_END, + .handler = kvm_sbi_ext_expevend_handler, +}; + +const struct kvm_vcpu_sbi_extension vcpu_sbi_ext_vendor = { + .extid_start = SBI_EXT_VENDOR_START, + .extid_end = SBI_EXT_VENDOR_END, + .handler = kvm_sbi_ext_expevend_handler, +};
The SBI experimental extension space is for temporary (or experimental) stuff whereas SBI vendor extension space is for hardware vendor specific stuff. Both these SBI extension spaces won't be standardized by the SBI specification so let's blindly forward such SBI calls to the userspace. Signed-off-by: Anup Patel <anup.patel@wdc.com> --- arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi.c | 4 ++++ arch/riscv/kvm/vcpu_sbi_base.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 31 insertions(+)