Message ID | 20220325060055.58482-1-pkshih@realtek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | rtw89: refine PCI and MAC codes into function with attributes | expand |
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes: > The existing PCI and MAC codes are only used by 8852AE, so many settings are > put in single function. To be clear, move the settings into an individual > function according to its functionality. Since functions will be shared > with chips, add attributes to make it possible to use common functions. > > Also, update the settings to the latest version of our internal code. > > This patchset is based on > "rtw89: add firmware reset and dump firmware memory and backtrace" and > "rtw89: update TX power table and 6G, refine IGI, and add TX/RX descriptors V1" > But no actual function dependency. The merge window is now open which means wireless-next is closed. I don't mind people submitting few -next patches during the merge window, but there's a limit for that. Currently I see 39 rtw89 patches in patchwork, that's just too much. So please try to limit the number of patches you submit during the merge window. Usually wireless-next opens few days after -rc1 is released, but there's no fixed schedule.
On Fri, 2022-03-25 at 13:11 +0200, Kalle Valo wrote: > Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> writes: > > > The existing PCI and MAC codes are only used by 8852AE, so many settings are > > put in single function. To be clear, move the settings into an individual > > function according to its functionality. Since functions will be shared > > with chips, add attributes to make it possible to use common functions. > > > > Also, update the settings to the latest version of our internal code. > > > > This patchset is based on > > "rtw89: add firmware reset and dump firmware memory and backtrace" and > > "rtw89: update TX power table and 6G, refine IGI, and add TX/RX descriptors V1" > > But no actual function dependency. > > The merge window is now open which means wireless-next is closed. I > don't mind people submitting few -next patches during the merge window, > but there's a limit for that. Currently I see 39 rtw89 patches in > patchwork, that's just too much. So please try to limit the number of > patches you submit during the merge window. > > Usually wireless-next opens few days after -rc1 is released, but there's > no fixed schedule. > Got it. I'll stop submitting before queued patches get reviewed. If this patchset is inconvenient to you, please drop it. Thank you Ping-Ke