Message ID | 20220404081509.94356-1-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Lorenzo Pieralisi |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] PCI: imx6: Fix PERST# start-up sequence | expand |
Am Montag, dem 04.04.2022 um 10:15 +0200 schrieb Francesco Dolcini: > According to the PCIe standard the PERST# signal (reset-gpio in > fsl,imx* compatible dts) should be kept asserted for at least 100 usec > before the PCIe refclock is stable, should be kept asserted for at > least 100 msec after the power rails are stable and the host should wait > at least 100 msec after it is de-asserted before accessing the > configuration space of any attached device. > > From PCIe CEM r2.0, sec 2.6.2 > > T-PVPERL: Power stable to PERST# inactive - 100 msec > T-PERST-CLK: REFCLK stable before PERST# inactive - 100 usec. > > From PCIe r5.0, sec 6.6.1 > > With a Downstream Port that does not support Link speeds greater than > 5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms before sending a > Configuration Request to the device immediately below that Port. > > Failure to do so could prevent PCIe devices to be working correctly, > and this was experienced with real devices. > > Move reset assert to imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(), this way we ensure > that PERST# is asserted before enabling any clock, move de-assert to the > end of imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() after the clock is enabled and > deemed stable and add a new delay of 100 msec just afterward. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220211152550.286821-1-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com > Fixes: bb38919ec56e ("PCI: imx6: Add support for i.MX6 PCIe controller") > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com> > Acked-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de> > > --- > v3: Add Acked-by: Richard Zhu > v2: Add complete reference to the PCIe standards, s/PCI-E/PCIe/g > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > index 6619e3caffe2..7a285fb0f619 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > @@ -408,6 +408,11 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", > ret); > } > + > + /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > + imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > } > > static unsigned int imx6_pcie_grp_offset(const struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > @@ -540,15 +545,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > /* allow the clocks to stabilize */ > usleep_range(200, 500); > > - /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > - if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > - imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > - msleep(100); > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > - !imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > - } > - > switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) { > case IMX8MQ: > reset_control_deassert(imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset); > @@ -595,6 +591,15 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > break; > } > > + /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { > + msleep(100); > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > + !imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > + /* Wait for 100ms after PERST# deassertion (PCIe r5.0, 6.6.1) */ > + msleep(100); > + } > + > return; > > err_ref_clk:
[CC'ed Pali, who is working on PERST consolidation] On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > According to the PCIe standard the PERST# signal (reset-gpio in > fsl,imx* compatible dts) should be kept asserted for at least 100 usec > before the PCIe refclock is stable, should be kept asserted for at > least 100 msec after the power rails are stable and the host should wait > at least 100 msec after it is de-asserted before accessing the > configuration space of any attached device. > > From PCIe CEM r2.0, sec 2.6.2 > > T-PVPERL: Power stable to PERST# inactive - 100 msec > T-PERST-CLK: REFCLK stable before PERST# inactive - 100 usec. > > From PCIe r5.0, sec 6.6.1 > > With a Downstream Port that does not support Link speeds greater than > 5.0 GT/s, software must wait a minimum of 100 ms before sending a > Configuration Request to the device immediately below that Port. > > Failure to do so could prevent PCIe devices to be working correctly, > and this was experienced with real devices. > > Move reset assert to imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(), this way we ensure > that PERST# is asserted before enabling any clock, move de-assert to the > end of imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset() after the clock is enabled and > deemed stable and add a new delay of 100 msec just afterward. > > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220211152550.286821-1-francesco.dolcini@toradex.com > Fixes: bb38919ec56e ("PCI: imx6: Add support for i.MX6 PCIe controller") > Signed-off-by: Francesco Dolcini <francesco.dolcini@toradex.com> > Acked-by: Richard Zhu <hongxing.zhu@nxp.com> > > --- > v3: Add Acked-by: Richard Zhu > v2: Add complete reference to the PCIe standards, s/PCI-E/PCIe/g > --- > drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 23 ++++++++++++++--------- > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > index 6619e3caffe2..7a285fb0f619 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c > @@ -408,6 +408,11 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", > ret); > } > + > + /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > + imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > } > > static unsigned int imx6_pcie_grp_offset(const struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > @@ -540,15 +545,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > /* allow the clocks to stabilize */ > usleep_range(200, 500); > > - /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > - if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > - imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > - msleep(100); > - gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > - !imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > - } > - > switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) { > case IMX8MQ: > reset_control_deassert(imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset); > @@ -595,6 +591,15 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) > break; > } > > + /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ > + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { > + msleep(100); > + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, > + !imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); > + /* Wait for 100ms after PERST# deassertion (PCIe r5.0, 6.6.1) */ > + msleep(100); > + } > + > return; > > err_ref_clk: > -- > 2.25.1 >
Hello Lorenzo, On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 05:50:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > [CC'ed Pali, who is working on PERST consolidation] > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > Failure to do so could prevent PCIe devices to be working correctly, > > and this was experienced with real devices. Just a gentle ping, any concern on the patch? Francesco
On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:09:19PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Hello Lorenzo, > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 05:50:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > [CC'ed Pali, who is working on PERST consolidation] > > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > Failure to do so could prevent PCIe devices to be working correctly, > > > and this was experienced with real devices. > > Just a gentle ping, any concern on the patch? I was waiting to see if Pali has any comments on it, given that he is working on consolidating PERST management. Lorenzo
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 06:49:12PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:09:19PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > Hello Lorenzo, > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 05:50:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > [CC'ed Pali, who is working on PERST consolidation] > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > > Failure to do so could prevent PCIe devices to be working correctly, > > > > and this was experienced with real devices. > > > > Just a gentle ping, any concern on the patch? > > I was waiting to see if Pali has any comments on it, given that he > is working on consolidating PERST management. Hello Pali, any concern on merging this patch? Thanks a lot Francesco
On Wednesday 11 May 2022 09:13:50 Francesco Dolcini wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 06:49:12PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:09:19PM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > Hello Lorenzo, > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 11, 2022 at 05:50:41PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > > > > [CC'ed Pali, who is working on PERST consolidation] > > > > > > > > On Mon, Apr 04, 2022 at 10:15:09AM +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > > > > > Failure to do so could prevent PCIe devices to be working correctly, > > > > > and this was experienced with real devices. > > > > > > Just a gentle ping, any concern on the patch? > > > > I was waiting to see if Pali has any comments on it, given that he > > is working on consolidating PERST management. > > Hello Pali, > any concern on merging this patch? > > Thanks a lot > Francesco Hello Francesco! I have no objections for your patch, it is fine to merge it. Btw, I lost interest in consolidating PERST# management as now I know that it would not be accepted.
On Mon, 4 Apr 2022 10:15:09 +0200, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > According to the PCIe standard the PERST# signal (reset-gpio in > fsl,imx* compatible dts) should be kept asserted for at least 100 usec > before the PCIe refclock is stable, should be kept asserted for at > least 100 msec after the power rails are stable and the host should wait > at least 100 msec after it is de-asserted before accessing the > configuration space of any attached device. > > [...] Applied to pci/imx6, thanks! [1/1] PCI: imx6: Fix PERST# start-up sequence https://git.kernel.org/lpieralisi/pci/c/a6809941c1 Thanks, Lorenzo
diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c index 6619e3caffe2..7a285fb0f619 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c @@ -408,6 +408,11 @@ static void imx6_pcie_assert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) dev_err(dev, "failed to disable vpcie regulator: %d\n", ret); } + + /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, + imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); } static unsigned int imx6_pcie_grp_offset(const struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) @@ -540,15 +545,6 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) /* allow the clocks to stabilize */ usleep_range(200, 500); - /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ - if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { - gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, - imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); - msleep(100); - gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, - !imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); - } - switch (imx6_pcie->drvdata->variant) { case IMX8MQ: reset_control_deassert(imx6_pcie->pciephy_reset); @@ -595,6 +591,15 @@ static void imx6_pcie_deassert_core_reset(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie) break; } + /* Some boards don't have PCIe reset GPIO. */ + if (gpio_is_valid(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio)) { + msleep(100); + gpio_set_value_cansleep(imx6_pcie->reset_gpio, + !imx6_pcie->gpio_active_high); + /* Wait for 100ms after PERST# deassertion (PCIe r5.0, 6.6.1) */ + msleep(100); + } + return; err_ref_clk: