Message ID | 20220526205646.258337-1-heiko@sntech.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | riscv: some svpbmt fixes | expand |
On Thu, 26 May 2022 13:56:41 PDT (-0700), heiko@sntech.de wrote: > Some additionals comments and notes from autobuilders received > after the series got applied, warranted some changes. > > So this is a small collection of cleanups for the svpbmt v10 series. > > changes in v2: > - add Guo's Review > - add patch dropping the use of function pointers in code > that can run before relocation > > Heiko Stuebner (5): > riscv: drop cpufeature_apply_feature tracking variable > riscv: Improve description for RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT Kconfig symbol > riscv: make patch-function pointer more generic in > cpu_manufacturer_info struct > riscv: fix dependency for t-head errata > riscv: remove usage of function-pointers from cpufeatures and t-head > errata > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 9 ++++++-- > arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas | 1 + > arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 38 ++++++++++---------------------- > arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++-------- > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 37 +++++++++---------------------- > 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) IMO only three of these are actually fixes, the rest are cleanups. I've got ahead and put everything on a branch, with riscv: Improve description for RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT Kconfig symbol riscv: drop cpufeature_apply_feature tracking variable riscv: fix dependency for t-head errata first. Those are on fixes, the whole thing is in for-next. Thanks!
Hi Palmer, Am Freitag, 17. Juni 2022, 01:03:32 CEST schrieb Palmer Dabbelt: > On Thu, 26 May 2022 13:56:41 PDT (-0700), heiko@sntech.de wrote: > > Some additionals comments and notes from autobuilders received > > after the series got applied, warranted some changes. > > > > So this is a small collection of cleanups for the svpbmt v10 series. > > > > changes in v2: > > - add Guo's Review > > - add patch dropping the use of function pointers in code > > that can run before relocation > > > > Heiko Stuebner (5): > > riscv: drop cpufeature_apply_feature tracking variable > > riscv: Improve description for RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT Kconfig symbol > > riscv: make patch-function pointer more generic in > > cpu_manufacturer_info struct > > riscv: fix dependency for t-head errata > > riscv: remove usage of function-pointers from cpufeatures and t-head > > errata > > > > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 9 ++++++-- > > arch/riscv/Kconfig.erratas | 1 + > > arch/riscv/errata/thead/errata.c | 38 ++++++++++---------------------- > > arch/riscv/kernel/alternative.c | 18 +++++++-------- > > arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 37 +++++++++---------------------- > > 5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 63 deletions(-) > > IMO only three of these are actually fixes, the rest are cleanups. I've > got ahead and put everything on a branch, with > > riscv: Improve description for RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT Kconfig symbol > riscv: drop cpufeature_apply_feature tracking variable > riscv: fix dependency for t-head errata > > first. Those are on fixes, the whole thing is in for-next. thanks a lot. For the fixes I think Nathan's "riscv: Fix ALT_THEAD_PMA's asm parameters" [0] would also be quite important. Heiko [0] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220518184529.454008-1-nathan@kernel.org