diff mbox series

usb: host: ehci-q: Fix ehci_submit_single_step_set_feature annotation typo

Message ID 20220620213621.GA694104@ubuntu (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 5c586db8465274ce5db64171d42a099ce89ec905
Headers show
Series usb: host: ehci-q: Fix ehci_submit_single_step_set_feature annotation typo | expand

Commit Message

V4bel June 20, 2022, 9:36 p.m. UTC
Dear all,
this is Hyunwoo Kim.

I found the "argument" typo.

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Greg KH June 21, 2022, 6:05 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 02:36:21PM -0700, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> Dear all,
> this is Hyunwoo Kim.
> 
> I found the "argument" typo.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> index 1163af6fad77..807e64991e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ submit_async (
>   * This is done in two parts: first SETUP req for GetDesc is sent then
>   * 15 seconds later, the IN stage for GetDesc starts to req data from dev
>   *
> - * is_setup : i/p arguement decides which of the two stage needs to be
> + * is_setup : i/p argument decides which of the two stage needs to be
>   * performed; TRUE - SETUP and FALSE - IN+STATUS
>   * Returns 0 if success
>   */
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> Regards,
> Hyunwoo Kim.

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You did not specify a description of why the patch is needed, or
  possibly, any description at all, in the email body.  Please read the
  section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what is needed in order to
  properly describe the change.

- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
  and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about.  Please read
  the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
  Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
  look like.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot
V4bel June 21, 2022, 6:29 a.m. UTC | #2
From 3ba1bf7eb8e672fcd5be65080a265d3428d1303a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:30:10 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-q: Fix ehci_submit_single_step_set_feature annotation typo

I found the "argument" typo.
It seems that "argument" is more correct than "arguement".

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
index 1163af6fad77..807e64991e3e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ submit_async (
  * This is done in two parts: first SETUP req for GetDesc is sent then
  * 15 seconds later, the IN stage for GetDesc starts to req data from dev
  *
- * is_setup : i/p arguement decides which of the two stage needs to be
+ * is_setup : i/p argument decides which of the two stage needs to be
  * performed; TRUE - SETUP and FALSE - IN+STATUS
  * Returns 0 if success
  */
--
2.25.1

Dear Greg,

I'm sending the patch back because the greg email bot emailed me.
I don't think there was anything wrong with the patch format.
Did I receive an email saying my patch was in the wrong format because 
my patch was a minor typo fix and the description was too short?

I'm sorry if I did something wrong.

Regards,
Hyunwoo Kim.
Greg Kroah-Hartman June 21, 2022, 6:35 a.m. UTC | #3
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 11:29:25PM -0700, Hyunwoo Kim wrote:
> >From 3ba1bf7eb8e672fcd5be65080a265d3428d1303a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:30:10 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH] usb: host: ehci-q: Fix ehci_submit_single_step_set_feature annotation typo

This shouldn't be in the body of the email, try using 'git send-email'
instead.

> 
> I found the "argument" typo.
> It seems that "argument" is more correct than "arguement".

That is much better, thanks.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> index 1163af6fad77..807e64991e3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
> @@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ submit_async (
>   * This is done in two parts: first SETUP req for GetDesc is sent then
>   * 15 seconds later, the IN stage for GetDesc starts to req data from dev
>   *
> - * is_setup : i/p arguement decides which of the two stage needs to be
> + * is_setup : i/p argument decides which of the two stage needs to be
>   * performed; TRUE - SETUP and FALSE - IN+STATUS
>   * Returns 0 if success
>   */
> --
> 2.25.1
> 
> Dear Greg,
> 
> I'm sending the patch back because the greg email bot emailed me.
> I don't think there was anything wrong with the patch format.
> Did I receive an email saying my patch was in the wrong format because 
> my patch was a minor typo fix and the description was too short?


This looks better, but can you resend this without the above header in
the body and then we can apply it.

thanks,

greg k-h
V4bel June 21, 2022, 6:42 a.m. UTC | #4
I found the "argument" typo. 
It seems that "argument" is more correct than "arguement".

Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim <imv4bel@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
index 1163af6fad77..807e64991e3e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@ submit_async (
  * This is done in two parts: first SETUP req for GetDesc is sent then
  * 15 seconds later, the IN stage for GetDesc starts to req data from dev
  *
- * is_setup : i/p arguement decides which of the two stage needs to be
+ * is_setup : i/p argument decides which of the two stage needs to be
  * performed; TRUE - SETUP and FALSE - IN+STATUS
  * Returns 0 if success
  */
--
2.25.1

Send it back without headers.
Sorry to bother you.

Regards,
Hyunwoo Kim.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
index 1163af6fad77..807e64991e3e 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-q.c
@@ -1162,7 +1162,7 @@  submit_async (
  * This is done in two parts: first SETUP req for GetDesc is sent then
  * 15 seconds later, the IN stage for GetDesc starts to req data from dev
  *
- * is_setup : i/p arguement decides which of the two stage needs to be
+ * is_setup : i/p argument decides which of the two stage needs to be
  * performed; TRUE - SETUP and FALSE - IN+STATUS
  * Returns 0 if success
  */