diff mbox series

[v2] brcmfmac: Fixes potential buffer overflow in 'brcmf_fweh_event_worker'

Message ID 20221020104954.GA461052@laguna (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show
Series [v2] brcmfmac: Fixes potential buffer overflow in 'brcmf_fweh_event_worker' | expand

Commit Message

Dokyung Song Oct. 20, 2022, 10:49 a.m. UTC 
This patch fixes an intra-object buffer overflow in brcmfmac that occurs
when the device provides a 'bsscfgidx' equal to or greater than the
buffer size. The patch adds a check that leads to a safe failure if that
is the case.

UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
index 52 is out of range for type 'brcmf_if *[16]'
CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G           O      5.14.0+ #132
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events brcmf_fweh_event_worker
Call Trace:
 dump_stack_lvl+0x57/0x7d
 ubsan_epilogue+0x5/0x40
 __ubsan_handle_out_of_bounds+0x69/0x80
 ? memcpy+0x39/0x60
 brcmf_fweh_event_worker+0xae1/0xc00
 ? brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x100/0x100
 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
 process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0
 ? lock_release+0x640/0x640
 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10
 ? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0
 ? process_one_work+0x13e0/0x13e0
 kthread+0x379/0x450
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
 ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
================================================================================
general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xe5601c0020023fff: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN
KASAN: maybe wild-memory-access in range [0x2b0100010011fff8-0x2b0100010011ffff]
CPU: 0 PID: 1898 Comm: kworker/0:2 Tainted: G           O      5.14.0+ #132
Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.12.1-0-ga5cab58e9a3f-prebuilt.qemu.org 04/01/2014
Workqueue: events brcmf_fweh_event_worker
RIP: 0010:brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x42/0x100
Code: 89 f5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 79 0b 38 fe 48 85 ed 74 7e e8 6f 0b 38 fe 48 89 ea 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 8b 00 00 00 4c 8b 7d 00 44 89 e0 48 ba 00 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000259fbd8 EFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115d8cd50 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0560200020023fff RSI: ffffffff8304bc91 RDI: ffff888115d8cd50
RBP: 2b0100010011ffff R08: ffff888112340050 R09: ffffed1023549809
R10: ffff88811aa4c047 R11: ffffed1023549808 R12: 0000000000000045
R13: ffffc9000259fca0 R14: ffff888112340050 R15: ffff888112340000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000004053ccc0 CR3: 0000000112740000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Call Trace:
 brcmf_fweh_event_worker+0x117/0xc00
 ? brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x100/0x100
 ? rcu_read_lock_sched_held+0xa1/0xd0
 ? rcu_read_lock_bh_held+0xb0/0xb0
 ? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare+0x273/0x3e0
 process_one_work+0x873/0x13e0
 ? lock_release+0x640/0x640
 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x320/0x320
 ? rwlock_bug.part.0+0x90/0x90
 worker_thread+0x8b/0xd10
 ? __kthread_parkme+0xd9/0x1d0
 ? process_one_work+0x13e0/0x13e0
 kthread+0x379/0x450
 ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x24/0x30
 ? set_kthread_struct+0x100/0x100
 ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x30
Modules linked in: 88XXau(O) 88x2bu(O)
---[ end trace 41d302138f3ff55a ]---
RIP: 0010:brcmf_fweh_call_event_handler.isra.0+0x42/0x100
Code: 89 f5 53 48 89 fb 48 83 ec 08 e8 79 0b 38 fe 48 85 ed 74 7e e8 6f 0b 38 fe 48 89 ea 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 8b 00 00 00 4c 8b 7d 00 44 89 e0 48 ba 00 00 00
RSP: 0018:ffffc9000259fbd8 EFLAGS: 00010207
RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: ffff888115d8cd50 RCX: 0000000000000000
RDX: 0560200020023fff RSI: ffffffff8304bc91 RDI: ffff888115d8cd50
RBP: 2b0100010011ffff R08: ffff888112340050 R09: ffffed1023549809
R10: ffff88811aa4c047 R11: ffffed1023549808 R12: 0000000000000045
R13: ffffc9000259fca0 R14: ffff888112340050 R15: ffff888112340000
FS:  0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88811aa00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
CR2: 000000004053ccc0 CR3: 0000000112740000 CR4: 0000000000750ef0
DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: 0000000000000000
DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000fffe0ff0 DR7: 0000000000000400
PKRU: 55555554
Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception

Reported-by: Dokyung Song <dokyungs@yonsei.ac.kr>
Reported-by: Jisoo Jang <jisoo.jang@yonsei.ac.kr>
Reported-by: Minsuk Kang <linuxlovemin@yonsei.ac.kr>
Reviewed-by: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Dokyung Song <dokyung.song@gmail.com>
---
v1->v2: Addressed review comments

 drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

Comments

Arend Van Spriel Oct. 20, 2022, 11:29 a.m. UTC | #1 
+ Kalle

On 10/20/2022 12:49 PM, Dokyung Song wrote:
> This patch fixes an intra-object buffer overflow in brcmfmac that occurs
> when the device provides a 'bsscfgidx' equal to or greater than the
> buffer size. The patch adds a check that leads to a safe failure if that
> is the case.

Thanks for the updated patch. The subject for all linux-wireless patches 
should begin with 'wifi:'. Sorry for noticing it not earlier. Maybe 
Kalle can correct it when applying the patch.

Regards,
Arend
Arend Van Spriel Oct. 20, 2022, 11:30 a.m. UTC | #2 
The working email address this time (I hope).

On 10/20/2022 1:29 PM, Arend Van Spriel wrote:
> + Kalle
> 
> On 10/20/2022 12:49 PM, Dokyung Song wrote:
>> This patch fixes an intra-object buffer overflow in brcmfmac that occurs
>> when the device provides a 'bsscfgidx' equal to or greater than the
>> buffer size. The patch adds a check that leads to a safe failure if that
>> is the case.
> 
> Thanks for the updated patch. The subject for all linux-wireless patches 
> should begin with 'wifi:'. Sorry for noticing it not earlier. Maybe 
> Kalle can correct it when applying the patch.
> 
> Regards,
> Arend
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
index bc3f4e4edcdf..dac7eb77799b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/fweh.c
@@ -228,6 +228,10 @@  static void brcmf_fweh_event_worker(struct work_struct *work)
 			  brcmf_fweh_event_name(event->code), event->code,
 			  event->emsg.ifidx, event->emsg.bsscfgidx,
 			  event->emsg.addr);
+		if (event->emsg.bsscfgidx >= BRCMF_MAX_IFS) {
+			bphy_err(drvr, "invalid bsscfg index: %u\n", event->emsg.bsscfgidx);
+			goto event_free;
+		}
 
 		/* convert event message */
 		emsg_be = &event->emsg;