Message ID | 85b5e8374fc9b86fb955060c1840f3b2a1d187e4.1666614616.git.deren.wu@mediatek.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Delegated to: | Felix Fietkau |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] wifi: mt76: fix bandwidth 80MHz link fail in 6GHz band | expand |
> From: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com> > > Due to information missing, the firmware may be fail on bandwidth > related settings in mt7921/mt7922. Add new cmd STA_REC_HE_V2 to apply > additional capabilities in 6GHz band. > > Tested-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > Co-developed-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com> > Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com> > --- > v2: Fix le16/cpu type problem, reported by kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> > --- > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c | 34 +++++++++++++++++++ > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h | 11 ++++++ > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > index 011fc9729b38..9bba18d24c71 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > @@ -744,6 +744,39 @@ mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > he->pkt_ext = 2; > } > > +static void > +mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) Is this tlv available just for 7921 fw? If so I guess we should add it just for it since mt76_connac_mcu_sta_tlv is used even by other chipsets. Regards, Lorenzo > +{ > + struct ieee80211_sta_he_cap *he_cap = &sta->deflink.he_cap; > + struct ieee80211_he_cap_elem *elem = &he_cap->he_cap_elem; > + struct sta_rec_he_v2 *he; > + struct tlv *tlv; > + > + tlv = mt76_connac_mcu_add_tlv(skb, STA_REC_HE_V2, sizeof(*he)); > + > + he = (struct sta_rec_he_v2 *)tlv; > + memcpy(he->he_phy_cap, elem->phy_cap_info, sizeof(he->he_phy_cap)); > + memcpy(he->he_mac_cap, elem->mac_cap_info, sizeof(he->he_mac_cap)); > + > + switch (sta->deflink.bandwidth) { > + case IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160: > + if (elem->phy_cap_info[0] & > + IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP0_CHANNEL_WIDTH_SET_80PLUS80_MHZ_IN_5G) > + he->max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW8080] = > + he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_80p80; > + > + he->max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW160] = > + he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_160; > + fallthrough; > + default: > + he->max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW80] = > + he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_80; > + break; > + } > + > + he->pkt_ext = IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP9_NOMINAL_PKT_PADDING_16US; > +} > + > static u8 > mt76_connac_get_phy_mode_v2(struct mt76_phy *mphy, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, > enum nl80211_band band, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > @@ -838,6 +871,7 @@ void mt76_connac_mcu_sta_tlv(struct mt76_phy *mphy, struct sk_buff *skb, > /* starec he */ > if (sta->deflink.he_cap.has_he) { > mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv(skb, sta); > + mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2(skb, sta); > if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && > sta_state == MT76_STA_INFO_STATE_ASSOC) { > struct sta_rec_he_6g_capa *he_6g_capa; > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h > index cf4ce3b1fc21..8166722d4717 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h > @@ -354,6 +354,16 @@ struct sta_rec_he { > u8 rsv2[2]; > } __packed; > > +struct sta_rec_he_v2 { > + __le16 tag; > + __le16 len; > + u8 he_mac_cap[6]; > + u8 he_phy_cap[11]; > + u8 pkt_ext; > + /* 0: BW80, 1: BW160, 2: BW8080 */ > + __le16 max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW_NUM]; > +} __packed; > + > struct sta_rec_amsdu { > __le16 tag; > __le16 len; > @@ -779,6 +789,7 @@ enum { > STA_REC_BFEE, > STA_REC_PHY = 0x15, > STA_REC_HE_6G = 0x17, > + STA_REC_HE_V2 = 0x19, > STA_REC_MAX_NUM > }; > > -- > 2.18.0 >
Hi Lorenzo, On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 10:33 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > From: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com> > > > > Due to information missing, the firmware may be fail on bandwidth > > related settings in mt7921/mt7922. Add new cmd STA_REC_HE_V2 to > > apply > > additional capabilities in 6GHz band. > > > > Tested-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > > Co-developed-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com> > > Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com> > > --- > > v2: Fix le16/cpu type problem, reported by kernel test robot < > > lkp@intel.com> > > --- > > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c | 34 > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h | 11 ++++++ > > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > index 011fc9729b38..9bba18d24c71 100644 > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > @@ -744,6 +744,39 @@ mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv(struct sk_buff > > *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > > he->pkt_ext = 2; > > } > > > > +static void > > +mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2(struct sk_buff *skb, struct > > ieee80211_sta *sta) > > Is this tlv available just for 7921 fw? If so I guess we should add > it just for > it since mt76_connac_mcu_sta_tlv is used even by other chipsets. > > Regards, > Lorenzo > For now, mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2() would be used for mt7921 only, not for other chips. However, it would be used for all next-generation chipsets. I propose to put it here and we will take this API in new chip porting. Regards, Deren
> Hi Lorenzo, > > On Tue, 2022-10-25 at 10:33 +0200, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote: > > > From: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com> > > > > > > Due to information missing, the firmware may be fail on bandwidth > > > related settings in mt7921/mt7922. Add new cmd STA_REC_HE_V2 to > > > apply > > > additional capabilities in 6GHz band. > > > > > > Tested-by: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com> > > > Co-developed-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Deren Wu <deren.wu@mediatek.com> > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Yen Hsieh <mingyen.hsieh@mediatek.com> > > > --- > > > v2: Fix le16/cpu type problem, reported by kernel test robot < > > > lkp@intel.com> > > > --- > > > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c | 34 > > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > > .../wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h | 11 ++++++ > > > 2 files changed, 45 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > index 011fc9729b38..9bba18d24c71 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c > > > @@ -744,6 +744,39 @@ mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv(struct sk_buff > > > *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) > > > he->pkt_ext = 2; > > > } > > > > > > +static void > > > +mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2(struct sk_buff *skb, struct > > > ieee80211_sta *sta) > > > > Is this tlv available just for 7921 fw? If so I guess we should add > > it just for > > it since mt76_connac_mcu_sta_tlv is used even by other chipsets. > > > > Regards, > > Lorenzo > > > > For now, mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2() would be used for mt7921 only, > not for other chips. However, it would be used for all next-generation > chipsets. I propose to put it here and we will take this API in new > chip porting. I am fine with it, I was thinking just to not introduce regression on previous chips. Regards, Lorenzo > > Regards, > Deren > >
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c index 011fc9729b38..9bba18d24c71 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.c @@ -744,6 +744,39 @@ mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) he->pkt_ext = 2; } +static void +mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) +{ + struct ieee80211_sta_he_cap *he_cap = &sta->deflink.he_cap; + struct ieee80211_he_cap_elem *elem = &he_cap->he_cap_elem; + struct sta_rec_he_v2 *he; + struct tlv *tlv; + + tlv = mt76_connac_mcu_add_tlv(skb, STA_REC_HE_V2, sizeof(*he)); + + he = (struct sta_rec_he_v2 *)tlv; + memcpy(he->he_phy_cap, elem->phy_cap_info, sizeof(he->he_phy_cap)); + memcpy(he->he_mac_cap, elem->mac_cap_info, sizeof(he->he_mac_cap)); + + switch (sta->deflink.bandwidth) { + case IEEE80211_STA_RX_BW_160: + if (elem->phy_cap_info[0] & + IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP0_CHANNEL_WIDTH_SET_80PLUS80_MHZ_IN_5G) + he->max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW8080] = + he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_80p80; + + he->max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW160] = + he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_160; + fallthrough; + default: + he->max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW80] = + he_cap->he_mcs_nss_supp.rx_mcs_80; + break; + } + + he->pkt_ext = IEEE80211_HE_PHY_CAP9_NOMINAL_PKT_PADDING_16US; +} + static u8 mt76_connac_get_phy_mode_v2(struct mt76_phy *mphy, struct ieee80211_vif *vif, enum nl80211_band band, struct ieee80211_sta *sta) @@ -838,6 +871,7 @@ void mt76_connac_mcu_sta_tlv(struct mt76_phy *mphy, struct sk_buff *skb, /* starec he */ if (sta->deflink.he_cap.has_he) { mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv(skb, sta); + mt76_connac_mcu_sta_he_tlv_v2(skb, sta); if (band == NL80211_BAND_6GHZ && sta_state == MT76_STA_INFO_STATE_ASSOC) { struct sta_rec_he_6g_capa *he_6g_capa; diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h index cf4ce3b1fc21..8166722d4717 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt76_connac_mcu.h @@ -354,6 +354,16 @@ struct sta_rec_he { u8 rsv2[2]; } __packed; +struct sta_rec_he_v2 { + __le16 tag; + __le16 len; + u8 he_mac_cap[6]; + u8 he_phy_cap[11]; + u8 pkt_ext; + /* 0: BW80, 1: BW160, 2: BW8080 */ + __le16 max_nss_mcs[CMD_HE_MCS_BW_NUM]; +} __packed; + struct sta_rec_amsdu { __le16 tag; __le16 len; @@ -779,6 +789,7 @@ enum { STA_REC_BFEE, STA_REC_PHY = 0x15, STA_REC_HE_6G = 0x17, + STA_REC_HE_V2 = 0x19, STA_REC_MAX_NUM };