diff mbox series

[1/2,v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML

Message ID 20221130200945.24459-1-rdunlap@infradead.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [1/2,v2] IB/qib: don't use qib_wc_x86_64 for UML | expand

Commit Message

Randy Dunlap Nov. 30, 2022, 8:09 p.m. UTC
When building qib_wc_x86_64.c on ARCH=um, references to some cpuinfo
fields cause build errors since cpuinfo does not contain x86-specific
fields.

Fix the build errors by making this driver depend on !UML.

Prevents these build errors:

../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c: In function ‘qib_unordered_wc’:
../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:29: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
  149 |         return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_AMD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘X86_VENDOR_ANY’?
  149 |         return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:150:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
  150 | }

Fixes: 68f5d3f3b654 ("um: add PCI over virtio emulation driver")
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
---
v2: rebase & resend

 drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig |    1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

Comments

Leon Romanovsky Dec. 1, 2022, 9:22 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Nov 30, 2022 at 12:09:45PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> When building qib_wc_x86_64.c on ARCH=um, references to some cpuinfo
> fields cause build errors since cpuinfo does not contain x86-specific
> fields.
> 
> Fix the build errors by making this driver depend on !UML.
> 
> Prevents these build errors:
> 
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c: In function ‘qib_unordered_wc’:
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:29: error: ‘struct cpuinfo_um’ has no member named ‘x86_vendor’
>   149 |         return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: error: ‘X86_VENDOR_AMD’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘X86_VENDOR_ANY’?
>   149 |         return boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD;
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:149:44: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
> ../drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_wc_x86_64.c:150:1: error: control reaches end of non-void function [-Werror=return-type]
>   150 | }
> 
> Fixes: 68f5d3f3b654 ("um: add PCI over virtio emulation driver")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> Cc: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
> Cc: Dennis Dalessandro <dennis.dalessandro@cornelisnetworks.com>
> Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org
> Cc: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
> Cc: Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>
> Cc: Anton Ivanov <anton.ivanov@cambridgegreys.com>
> Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
> Cc: linux-um@lists.infradead.org
> ---
> v2: rebase & resend
> 
>  drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig |    1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff -- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config INFINIBAND_QIB
>  	tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
>  	depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
>  	depends on PCI
> +	depends on !UML

I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.

Thanks

>  	help
>  	This is a low-level driver for Intel PCIe QLE InfiniBand host
>  	channel adapters.  This driver does not support the Intel
Richard Weinberger Dec. 1, 2022, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #2
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.

Yes. Makes sense.

Thanks,
//richard
Johannes Berg Dec. 1, 2022, 9:28 a.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:22 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> 
> > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config INFINIBAND_QIB
> >  	tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
> >  	depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
> >  	depends on PCI
> > +	depends on !UML
> 
> I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.
> 

You could argue that one might want to eventually use kunit for some
bits and pieces in there, so it'd make sense to be able to build the
parts that _can_ be built, but I have no idea :)

johannes
Leon Romanovsky Dec. 1, 2022, 10:12 a.m. UTC | #4
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 10:28:18AM +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 11:22 +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > 
> > > +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
> > > @@ -3,6 +3,7 @@ config INFINIBAND_QIB
> > >  	tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
> > >  	depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
> > >  	depends on PCI
> > > +	depends on !UML
> > 
> > I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> > None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.
> > 
> 
> You could argue that one might want to eventually use kunit for some
> bits and pieces in there, so it'd make sense to be able to build the
> parts that _can_ be built, but I have no idea :)

But now, we don't have anyone in RDMA who uses kunit. Once it will be
needed, he/she will extend drivers/infiniband to support it.

Thanks

> 
> johannes
Christoph Hellwig Dec. 1, 2022, 5:15 p.m. UTC | #5
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:22:04AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.

software iWarp and RoCE absolutely make sense on UML.
Leon Romanovsky Dec. 1, 2022, 6:05 p.m. UTC | #6
On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 09:15:31AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2022 at 11:22:04AM +0200, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> > I would advocate to add this line to whole drivers/infiniband.
> > None of RDMA code makes sense for UML.
> 
> software iWarp and RoCE absolutely make sense on UML.

Ok, to be more pedantic "none of RDMA HW code ...".
However does anybody use rxe or siw in UML?

Thanks
diff mbox series

Patch

diff -- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
--- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/Kconfig
@@ -3,6 +3,7 @@  config INFINIBAND_QIB
 	tristate "Intel PCIe HCA support"
 	depends on 64BIT && INFINIBAND_RDMAVT
 	depends on PCI
+	depends on !UML
 	help
 	This is a low-level driver for Intel PCIe QLE InfiniBand host
 	channel adapters.  This driver does not support the Intel