Message ID | 20230223220546.52879-3-conor@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: avoid build issues for clang/llvm-17 with binutils 2.35 | expand |
Context | Check | Description |
---|---|---|
conchuod/tree_selection | fail | Failed to apply to next/pending-fixes or riscv/for-next |
Hi Conor, On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 10:05:46PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > > Quoting the llvm docs: > > Between versions 2.0 and 2.1 of the base I specification, a backwards > > incompatible change was made to remove selected instructions and CSRs > > from the base ISA. These instructions were grouped into a set of new > > extensions, but were no longer required by the base ISA. (snip) LLVM > > currently implements version 2.0 of the base specification. Thus, > > instructions from these extensions are accepted as part of the base > > ISA. > > There is therefore no need (at present!) to carry out a $cc-option > check, and instead just gate presence of zicsr and zifencei in march > on the version of binutils that commit 6df2a016c0c8 ("riscv: fix build > with binutils 2.38") highlights as the introduction of the requirement. > > In fact, the status quo creates some issues with mixed llvm/binutils > builds, specifically building with llvm-17 and ld from binutils-2.35. > Odd combo you may think, but this is what tuxsuite's debian stable uses > while testing 5.10 stable kernels as doesn't support LLD. > > CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # needs RISC-V: move zicsr/zifencei spec version check to Kconfi I think it would be better to drop this comment and just mark patch 1 for stable directly. However, if it remains, 'Kconfi' -> 'Kconfig' :) > Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/CA+G9fYt9T=ELCLaB9byxaLW2Qf4pZcDO=huCA0D8ug2V2+irJQ@mail.gmail.com/ > Suggested-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> Thanks for helping getting down to the bottom of this! > --- > arch/riscv/Kconfig | 3 +-- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > index 4eb0ef8314b3..c6902f4c5650 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig > +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig > @@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ endchoice > config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213 > bool > default y > - depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zicsr_zifencei) > - depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zicsr_zifencei) > + depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800 > help > Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which > moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei > -- > 2.39.1 >
diff --git a/arch/riscv/Kconfig b/arch/riscv/Kconfig index 4eb0ef8314b3..c6902f4c5650 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/Kconfig +++ b/arch/riscv/Kconfig @@ -291,8 +291,7 @@ endchoice config TOOLCHAIN_NEEDS_SPEC_20191213 bool default y - depends on !64BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=lp64 -march=rv64ima_zicsr_zifencei) - depends on !32BIT || $(cc-option,-mabi=ilp32 -march=rv32ima_zicsr_zifencei) + depends on AS_IS_GNU && AS_VERSION >= 23800 help Newer binutils versions default to ISA spec version 20191213 which moves some instructions from the I extension to the Zicsr and Zifencei