| Message ID | 20230609125153.3919-5-hare@suse.de (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Delegated to: | Netdev Maintainers |
| Headers | show |
| Series | net/tls: fixes for NVMe-over-TLS | expand |
| Context | Check | Description |
|---|---|---|
| netdev/tree_selection | success | Guessing tree name failed - patch did not apply |
Reviewed-by: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c index e699548d4247..c1cd1446c7e2 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c @@ -476,6 +476,17 @@ TEST_F(tls, msg_more_unsent) EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, MSG_DONTWAIT), -1); } +TEST_F(tls, msg_eor) +{ + char const *test_str = "test_read"; + int send_len = 10; + char buf[10]; + + EXPECT_EQ(send(self->fd, test_str, send_len, MSG_EOR), send_len); + EXPECT_EQ(recv(self->cfd, buf, send_len, MSG_WAITALL), send_len); + EXPECT_EQ(memcmp(buf, test_str, send_len), 0); +} + TEST_F(tls, sendmsg_single) { struct msghdr msg;
As the recent patch is modifying the behaviour for TLS re MSG_EOR handling we should be having a test for it. Signed-off-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de> --- tools/testing/selftests/net/tls.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)