| Message ID | 20230818051319.551-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | Fix wakeup problems on some AMD platforms | expand |
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 7:14 AM Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote: > > Problems have been reported on AMD laptops with suspend/resume > where particular root ports are put into D3 and then the system is unable > to resume properly. > > This is caused by the policy used by the Linux kernel to put PCIe root ports > into D3. This series adjusts the policy to be more conservative and only > put root ports into D3 if the platform has indicated that it is necessary > to do so. > > Andy Shevchenko (1): > ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add for_each_lpi_constraint() helper > > Mario Limonciello (11): > PCI: Only put Intel PCIe ports >= 2015 into D3 > ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements > ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use > ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints > ACPI: x86: s2idle: Catch multiple ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE objects > ACPI: x86: s2idle: Fix a logic error parsing AMD constraints table > ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add more debugging for AMD constraints parsing > ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add a function to get constraints for a device > PCI: ACPI: Add helper functions for converting ACPI <->PCI states > PCI: ACPI: Use device constraints to opt devices into D3 support > PCI: ACPI: Limit the Intel specific opt-in to D3 to 2024 I think that patches [02-08/11] can be applied before the rest of the series. In fact, I'd like to do that and expose a forward-only branch containing them. Then, patches [1,09-11/11] will become a separate PCI/ACPI specific series that should be somewhat easier to grasp. What do you think?
On 8/18/2023 03:06, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 7:14 AM Mario Limonciello > <mario.limonciello@amd.com> wrote: >> >> Problems have been reported on AMD laptops with suspend/resume >> where particular root ports are put into D3 and then the system is unable >> to resume properly. >> >> This is caused by the policy used by the Linux kernel to put PCIe root ports >> into D3. This series adjusts the policy to be more conservative and only >> put root ports into D3 if the platform has indicated that it is necessary >> to do so. >> >> Andy Shevchenko (1): >> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add for_each_lpi_constraint() helper >> >> Mario Limonciello (11): >> PCI: Only put Intel PCIe ports >= 2015 into D3 >> ACPI: Add comments to clarify some #ifdef statements >> ACPI: Adjust #ifdef for *_lps0_dev use >> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Post-increment variables when getting constraints >> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Catch multiple ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE objects >> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Fix a logic error parsing AMD constraints table >> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add more debugging for AMD constraints parsing >> ACPI: x86: s2idle: Add a function to get constraints for a device >> PCI: ACPI: Add helper functions for converting ACPI <->PCI states >> PCI: ACPI: Use device constraints to opt devices into D3 support >> PCI: ACPI: Limit the Intel specific opt-in to D3 to 2024 > > I think that patches [02-08/11] can be applied before the rest of the series. > > In fact, I'd like to do that and expose a forward-only branch containing them. > > Then, patches [1,09-11/11] will become a separate PCI/ACPI specific > series that should be somewhat easier to grasp. > > What do you think? Sure, this makes sense to me, but we'll still need to land it in the same maintainer's tree since there are new symbols. I'll adjust for the other feedback and split it into two series.