@@ -241,13 +241,14 @@ void qib_notify_error_qp(struct rvt_qp *qp)
{
struct qib_qp_priv *priv = qp->priv;
struct qib_ibdev *dev = to_idev(qp->ibqp.device);
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&dev->rdi.pending_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->rdi.pending_lock, flags);
if (!list_empty(&priv->iowait) && !(qp->s_flags & RVT_S_BUSY)) {
qp->s_flags &= ~RVT_S_ANY_WAIT_IO;
list_del_init(&priv->iowait);
}
- spin_unlock(&dev->rdi.pending_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->rdi.pending_lock, flags);
if (!(qp->s_flags & RVT_S_BUSY)) {
qp->s_hdrwords = 0;
@@ -367,11 +368,12 @@ void qib_flush_qp_waiters(struct rvt_qp *qp)
{
struct qib_qp_priv *priv = qp->priv;
struct qib_ibdev *dev = to_idev(qp->ibqp.device);
+ unsigned long flags;
- spin_lock(&dev->rdi.pending_lock);
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->rdi.pending_lock, flags);
if (!list_empty(&priv->iowait))
list_del_init(&priv->iowait);
- spin_unlock(&dev->rdi.pending_lock);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dev->rdi.pending_lock, flags);
}
/**
qib_7322intr() could introduce double locks on &dev->rdi.pending_lock if it preempts other execution units requiring the same locks. <Deadlock #1> qib_notify_error_qp() --> spin_lock(&dev->rdi.pending_lock) <interrupt> --> qib_7322intr() --> qib_ib_piobufavail() --> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->rdi.pending_lock) <Deadlock #2> qib_flush_qp_waiters() --> spin_lock(&dev->rdi.pending_lock) <interrupt> --> qib_7220intr() --> qib_ib_piobufavail() --> spin_lock_irqsave(&dev->rdi.pending_lock) This flaw was found by an experimental static analysis tool I am developing for irq-related deadlock. To prevent the potential deadlock, the patch uses spin_lock_irqsave() on &dev->rdi.pending_lock inside qib_notify_error_qp() and qib_flush_qp_waiters() to prevent the possible deadlock scenario. Signed-off-by: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com> --- drivers/infiniband/hw/qib/qib_qp.c | 10 ++++++---- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)