diff mbox series

[RFC] wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use

Message ID 20231106231715.3a506ac2dadb.Ie774b85b9d4ff934a1236e77096cb9c6c9fe6561@changeid (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Johannes Berg
Headers show
Series [RFC] wifi: cfg80211: fix CQM for non-range use | expand

Commit Message

Johannes Berg Nov. 6, 2023, 10:17 p.m. UTC
From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>

My prior race fix here broke CQM when ranges aren't used, as
the reporting worker now requires the cqm_config to be set in
the wdev, but isn't set when there's no range configured.

Rather than continuing to special-case the range version, set
the cqm_config always and configure accordingly, also tracking
if range was used or not to be able to clear the configuration
appropriately with the same API, which was actually not right
if both were implemented by a driver for some reason, as is
the case with mac80211 (though there the implementations are
equivalent so it doesn't matter.)

Also, the original multiple-RSSI commit lost checking for the
callback, so might have potentially crashed if a driver had
neither implementation, and userspace tried to use it despite
not being advertised as supported.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: 4a4b8169501b ("cfg80211: Accept multiple RSSI thresholds for CQM")
Fixes: 37c20b2effe9 ("wifi: cfg80211: fix cqm_config access race")
Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
---
 net/wireless/core.h    |  1 +
 net/wireless/nl80211.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 2 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael Krause Nov. 28, 2023, 5:47 p.m. UTC | #1
Dear Johannes,

You are probably aware of this already, but I believe this patch is quite crucial as your earlier patch may have effectively broken some roaming scenarios using wpa_supplicant.

The supplicant is using CQM to monitor for RSSI threshold changes (non-ranged) to switch between short (few seconds) and very long (1 *hour* in the default NetworkManager setting) background scan intervals. With a current lts kernel (6.1.63) on Arch I do not see RSSI change events at all and wpa_supplicant will almost never (1 hour timeout) scan for a better AP as long as the current AP is still in range.

I applied your patch against 6.1.63 with some additional `goto unlock`s and it resolves the issue for me. I've been running the kernel for 2 days now.

cheers,
Michael
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/wireless/core.h b/net/wireless/core.h
index 4c692c7faf30..cb61d33d4f1e 100644
--- a/net/wireless/core.h
+++ b/net/wireless/core.h
@@ -293,6 +293,7 @@  struct cfg80211_cqm_config {
 	u32 rssi_hyst;
 	s32 last_rssi_event_value;
 	enum nl80211_cqm_rssi_threshold_event last_rssi_event_type;
+	bool use_range_api;
 	int n_rssi_thresholds;
 	s32 rssi_thresholds[] __counted_by(n_rssi_thresholds);
 };
diff --git a/net/wireless/nl80211.c b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
index 569234bc2be6..dbfed5a2d7b6 100644
--- a/net/wireless/nl80211.c
+++ b/net/wireless/nl80211.c
@@ -12787,10 +12787,6 @@  static int cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(struct cfg80211_registered_device *rdev,
 	int i, n, low_index;
 	int err;
 
-	/* RSSI reporting disabled? */
-	if (!cqm_config)
-		return rdev_set_cqm_rssi_range_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0);
-
 	/*
 	 * Obtain current RSSI value if possible, if not and no RSSI threshold
 	 * event has been received yet, we should receive an event after a
@@ -12865,23 +12861,25 @@  static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct genl_info *info,
 	    wdev->iftype != NL80211_IFTYPE_P2P_CLIENT)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (n_thresholds <= 1 && rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config) {
-		if (n_thresholds == 0 || thresholds[0] == 0) /* Disabling */
-			return rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0);
-
-		return rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev,
-						thresholds[0], hysteresis);
-	}
-
-	if (!wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy,
-				     NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_CQM_RSSI_LIST))
-		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
-
 	if (n_thresholds == 1 && thresholds[0] == 0) /* Disabling */
 		n_thresholds = 0;
 
 	old = wiphy_dereference(wdev->wiphy, wdev->cqm_config);
 
+	/* if already disabled just succeed */
+	if (!n_thresholds && !old)
+		return 0;
+
+	if (n_thresholds > 1) {
+		if (!wiphy_ext_feature_isset(&rdev->wiphy,
+					     NL80211_EXT_FEATURE_CQM_RSSI_LIST) ||
+		    !rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_range_config)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	} else {
+		if (!rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config)
+			return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
 	if (n_thresholds) {
 		cqm_config = kzalloc(struct_size(cqm_config, rssi_thresholds,
 						 n_thresholds),
@@ -12894,13 +12892,26 @@  static int nl80211_set_cqm_rssi(struct genl_info *info,
 		memcpy(cqm_config->rssi_thresholds, thresholds,
 		       flex_array_size(cqm_config, rssi_thresholds,
 				       n_thresholds));
+		cqm_config->use_range_api = n_thresholds > 1 ||
+					    !rdev->ops->set_cqm_rssi_config;
 
 		rcu_assign_pointer(wdev->cqm_config, cqm_config);
+
+		if (cqm_config->use_range_api)
+			err = cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, dev, cqm_config);
+		else
+			err = rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev,
+						       thresholds[0],
+						       hysteresis);
 	} else {
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(wdev->cqm_config, NULL);
+		/* if enabled as range also disable via range */
+		if (old->use_range_api)
+			err = rdev_set_cqm_rssi_range_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0);
+		else
+			err = rdev_set_cqm_rssi_config(rdev, dev, 0, 0);
 	}
 
-	err = cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, dev, cqm_config);
 	if (err) {
 		rcu_assign_pointer(wdev->cqm_config, old);
 		kfree_rcu(cqm_config, rcu_head);
@@ -19009,10 +19020,11 @@  void cfg80211_cqm_rssi_notify_work(struct wiphy *wiphy, struct wiphy_work *work)
 	s32 rssi_level;
 
 	cqm_config = wiphy_dereference(wdev->wiphy, wdev->cqm_config);
-	if (!wdev->cqm_config)
+	if (!cqm_config)
 		return;
 
-	cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, wdev->netdev, cqm_config);
+	if (cqm_config->use_range_api)
+		cfg80211_cqm_rssi_update(rdev, wdev->netdev, cqm_config);
 
 	rssi_level = cqm_config->last_rssi_event_value;
 	rssi_event = cqm_config->last_rssi_event_type;