diff mbox series

[v9,04/10] PCI: dwc: ep: Fix DBI access failure for drivers requiring refclk from host

Message ID 20240304-pci-dbi-rework-v9-4-29d433d99cda@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Delegated to: Krzysztof Wilczyński
Headers show
Series PCI: dwc: ep: Fix DBI access failure for drivers requiring refclk from host | expand

Commit Message

Manivannan Sadhasivam March 4, 2024, 9:22 a.m. UTC 
The DWC glue drivers requiring an active reference clock from the PCIe host
for initializing their PCIe EP core, set a flag called 'core_init_notifier'
to let DWC driver know that these drivers need a special attention during
initialization. In these drivers, access to the hw registers (like DBI)
before receiving the active refclk from host will result in access failure
and also could cause a whole system hang.

But the current DWC EP driver doesn't honor the requirements of the drivers
setting 'core_init_notifier' flag and tries to access the DBI registers
during dw_pcie_ep_init(). This causes the system hang for glue drivers such
as Tegra194 and Qcom EP as they depend on refclk from host and have set the
above mentioned flag.

To workaround this issue, users of the affected platforms have to maintain
the dependency with the PCIe host by booting the PCIe EP after host boot.
But this won't provide a good user experience, since PCIe EP is _one_ of
the features of those platforms and it doesn't make sense to delay the
whole platform booting due to PCIe requiring active refclk.

So to fix this issue, let's move all the DBI access from
dw_pcie_ep_init() in the DWC EP driver to the dw_pcie_ep_init_complete()
API. This API will only be called by the drivers setting
'core_init_notifier' flag once refclk is received from host. For the rest
of the drivers that gets the refclk locally, this API will be called
within dw_pcie_ep_init().

Fixes: e966f7390da9 ("PCI: dwc: Refactor core initialization code for EP mode")
Co-developed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
---
 drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c | 120 ++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 71 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)

Comments

Niklas Cassel March 7, 2024, 8:31 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 02:52:16PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> The DWC glue drivers requiring an active reference clock from the PCIe host
> for initializing their PCIe EP core, set a flag called 'core_init_notifier'
> to let DWC driver know that these drivers need a special attention during
> initialization. In these drivers, access to the hw registers (like DBI)
> before receiving the active refclk from host will result in access failure
> and also could cause a whole system hang.
> 
> But the current DWC EP driver doesn't honor the requirements of the drivers
> setting 'core_init_notifier' flag and tries to access the DBI registers
> during dw_pcie_ep_init(). This causes the system hang for glue drivers such
> as Tegra194 and Qcom EP as they depend on refclk from host and have set the
> above mentioned flag.
> 
> To workaround this issue, users of the affected platforms have to maintain
> the dependency with the PCIe host by booting the PCIe EP after host boot.
> But this won't provide a good user experience, since PCIe EP is _one_ of
> the features of those platforms and it doesn't make sense to delay the
> whole platform booting due to PCIe requiring active refclk.
> 
> So to fix this issue, let's move all the DBI access from
> dw_pcie_ep_init() in the DWC EP driver to the dw_pcie_ep_init_complete()
> API. This API will only be called by the drivers setting
> 'core_init_notifier' flag once refclk is received from host. For the rest
> of the drivers that gets the refclk locally, this API will be called
> within dw_pcie_ep_init().
> 
> Fixes: e966f7390da9 ("PCI: dwc: Refactor core initialization code for EP mode")
> Co-developed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> ---

I'm not sure if the Fixes tag is stictly correct, since there is
nothing wrong with the commit that the Fixes-tag is referencing.

What this patch addresses is an additional use-case/feature,
which allows you to start the EP-side before the RC-side.

However, I'm guessing that you kept the Fixes-tag such that this
patch will get backported. However, this patch is number 4/10 in
the patch series. If this is a strict fix that you want backported,
and it does not depend on any of the previous patches (it doesn't
seem that way), then I think that you should have put it as patch
1/10 in the series.

Patch ordering aside:
Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
Manivannan Sadhasivam March 8, 2024, 5:34 a.m. UTC | #2 
On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:31:12PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 02:52:16PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
> > The DWC glue drivers requiring an active reference clock from the PCIe host
> > for initializing their PCIe EP core, set a flag called 'core_init_notifier'
> > to let DWC driver know that these drivers need a special attention during
> > initialization. In these drivers, access to the hw registers (like DBI)
> > before receiving the active refclk from host will result in access failure
> > and also could cause a whole system hang.
> > 
> > But the current DWC EP driver doesn't honor the requirements of the drivers
> > setting 'core_init_notifier' flag and tries to access the DBI registers
> > during dw_pcie_ep_init(). This causes the system hang for glue drivers such
> > as Tegra194 and Qcom EP as they depend on refclk from host and have set the
> > above mentioned flag.
> > 
> > To workaround this issue, users of the affected platforms have to maintain
> > the dependency with the PCIe host by booting the PCIe EP after host boot.
> > But this won't provide a good user experience, since PCIe EP is _one_ of
> > the features of those platforms and it doesn't make sense to delay the
> > whole platform booting due to PCIe requiring active refclk.
> > 
> > So to fix this issue, let's move all the DBI access from
> > dw_pcie_ep_init() in the DWC EP driver to the dw_pcie_ep_init_complete()
> > API. This API will only be called by the drivers setting
> > 'core_init_notifier' flag once refclk is received from host. For the rest
> > of the drivers that gets the refclk locally, this API will be called
> > within dw_pcie_ep_init().
> > 
> > Fixes: e966f7390da9 ("PCI: dwc: Refactor core initialization code for EP mode")
> > Co-developed-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vidya Sagar <vidyas@nvidia.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <manivannan.sadhasivam@linaro.org>
> > ---
> 
> I'm not sure if the Fixes tag is stictly correct, since there is
> nothing wrong with the commit that the Fixes-tag is referencing.
> 

No. The commit was intented to move all the DBI accesses to
dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(), but it left few things like ep_init() callback that
could access the DBI registers. One may argue that the none of the drivers at
that time were accessing DBI registers in that callback etc... but I used that
commit as a fixes tag for the sake of backporting. Otherwise, I don't see how we
can easily backport this patch.

> What this patch addresses is an additional use-case/feature,
> which allows you to start the EP-side before the RC-side.
> 
> However, I'm guessing that you kept the Fixes-tag such that this
> patch will get backported. However, this patch is number 4/10 in
> the patch series. If this is a strict fix that you want backported,
> and it does not depend on any of the previous patches (it doesn't
> seem that way), then I think that you should have put it as patch
> 1/10 in the series.
> 

Not strictly required. Usually the fixes are added first for the ease of merging
as you said, but here I intend to merge this series as it is and it is not
fixing anything in the ongoing release. But, if I happen to respin, I may
reorder so that this can get merged early in next release cycle (this series is
going to miss 6.9 anyway).

> Patch ordering aside:
> Reviewed-by: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>

Thanks!

- Mani
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
index 1205bfba8310..99d66b0fa59b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware-ep.c
@@ -606,11 +606,16 @@  static unsigned int dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(struct dw_pcie *pci, int cap)
 int dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
+	struct device *dev = pci->dev;
+	struct pci_epc *epc = ep->epc;
 	unsigned int offset, ptm_cap_base;
 	unsigned int nbars;
 	u8 hdr_type;
+	u8 func_no;
+	int i, ret;
+	void *addr;
 	u32 reg;
-	int i;
 
 	hdr_type = dw_pcie_readb_dbi(pci, PCI_HEADER_TYPE) &
 		   PCI_HEADER_TYPE_MASK;
@@ -621,6 +626,58 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 		return -EIO;
 	}
 
+	dw_pcie_version_detect(pci);
+
+	dw_pcie_iatu_detect(pci);
+
+	ret = dw_pcie_edma_detect(pci);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	if (!ep->ib_window_map) {
+		ep->ib_window_map = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, pci->num_ib_windows,
+						       GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!ep->ib_window_map)
+			goto err_remove_edma;
+	}
+
+	if (!ep->ob_window_map) {
+		ep->ob_window_map = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, pci->num_ob_windows,
+						       GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!ep->ob_window_map)
+			goto err_remove_edma;
+	}
+
+	if (!ep->outbound_addr) {
+		addr = devm_kcalloc(dev, pci->num_ob_windows, sizeof(phys_addr_t),
+				    GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!addr)
+			goto err_remove_edma;
+		ep->outbound_addr = addr;
+	}
+
+	for (func_no = 0; func_no < epc->max_functions; func_no++) {
+
+		ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, func_no);
+		if (ep_func)
+			continue;
+
+		ep_func = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ep_func), GFP_KERNEL);
+		if (!ep_func)
+			goto err_remove_edma;
+
+		ep_func->func_no = func_no;
+		ep_func->msi_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(ep, func_no,
+							      PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
+		ep_func->msix_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(ep, func_no,
+							       PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
+
+		list_add_tail(&ep_func->list, &ep->func_list);
+	}
+
+	if (ep->ops->init)
+		ep->ops->init(ep);
+
 	offset = dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_REBAR);
 	ptm_cap_base = dw_pcie_ep_find_ext_capability(pci, PCI_EXT_CAP_ID_PTM);
 
@@ -655,14 +712,17 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 	dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_dis(pci);
 
 	return 0;
+
+err_remove_edma:
+	dw_pcie_edma_remove(pci);
+
+	return ret;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dw_pcie_ep_init_complete);
 
 int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
 	int ret;
-	void *addr;
-	u8 func_no;
 	struct resource *res;
 	struct pci_epc *epc;
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
@@ -670,7 +730,6 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 	struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
 	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
 	const struct pci_epc_features *epc_features;
-	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ep->func_list);
 
@@ -688,26 +747,6 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 	if (ep->ops->pre_init)
 		ep->ops->pre_init(ep);
 
-	dw_pcie_version_detect(pci);
-
-	dw_pcie_iatu_detect(pci);
-
-	ep->ib_window_map = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, pci->num_ib_windows,
-					       GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ep->ib_window_map)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	ep->ob_window_map = devm_bitmap_zalloc(dev, pci->num_ob_windows,
-					       GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!ep->ob_window_map)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-
-	addr = devm_kcalloc(dev, pci->num_ob_windows, sizeof(phys_addr_t),
-			    GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!addr)
-		return -ENOMEM;
-	ep->outbound_addr = addr;
-
 	epc = devm_pci_epc_create(dev, &epc_ops);
 	if (IS_ERR(epc)) {
 		dev_err(dev, "Failed to create epc device\n");
@@ -721,23 +760,6 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 	if (ret < 0)
 		epc->max_functions = 1;
 
-	for (func_no = 0; func_no < epc->max_functions; func_no++) {
-		ep_func = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ep_func), GFP_KERNEL);
-		if (!ep_func)
-			return -ENOMEM;
-
-		ep_func->func_no = func_no;
-		ep_func->msi_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(ep, func_no,
-							      PCI_CAP_ID_MSI);
-		ep_func->msix_cap = dw_pcie_ep_find_capability(ep, func_no,
-							       PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX);
-
-		list_add_tail(&ep_func->list, &ep->func_list);
-	}
-
-	if (ep->ops->init)
-		ep->ops->init(ep);
-
 	ret = pci_epc_mem_init(epc, ep->phys_base, ep->addr_size,
 			       ep->page_size);
 	if (ret < 0) {
@@ -753,25 +775,25 @@  int dw_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 		goto err_exit_epc_mem;
 	}
 
-	ret = dw_pcie_edma_detect(pci);
-	if (ret)
-		goto err_free_epc_mem;
-
 	if (ep->ops->get_features) {
 		epc_features = ep->ops->get_features(ep);
 		if (epc_features->core_init_notifier)
 			return 0;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * NOTE:- Avoid accessing the hardware (Ex:- DBI space) before this
+	 * step as platforms that implement 'core_init_notifier' feature may
+	 * not have the hardware ready (i.e. core initialized) for access
+	 * (Ex: tegra194). Any hardware access on such platforms result
+	 * in system hang.
+	 */
 	ret = dw_pcie_ep_init_complete(ep);
 	if (ret)
-		goto err_remove_edma;
+		goto err_free_epc_mem;
 
 	return 0;
 
-err_remove_edma:
-	dw_pcie_edma_remove(pci);
-
 err_free_epc_mem:
 	pci_epc_mem_free_addr(epc, ep->msi_mem_phys, ep->msi_mem,
 			      epc->mem->window.page_size);