Message ID | 20240906124518.10308-1-abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
Series | PCI: Fixed spelling in Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | expand |
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. > > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> > --- > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: > - Enable DMA/processing engines > > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant changes to make at the same time. > - Disable the device from generating IRQs > - Release the IRQ (free_irq()) > -- > 2.46.0 >
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:41:52AM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> > > --- > > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: > > - Enable DMA/processing engines > > > > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, > > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: > > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: > > I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with > changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant > changes to make at the same time. - "follow" has been corrected to "following", which is more appriopriate in this context. - I know its trivial, but can disturb the readers flow - do you want me to change the message to "Edited for clarity"
Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> writes: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:41:52AM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: >> > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> >> > --- >> > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >> > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst >> > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 >> > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst >> > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst >> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: >> > - Enable DMA/processing engines >> > >> > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, >> > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: >> > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: >> >> I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with >> changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant >> changes to make at the same time. > > - "follow" has been corrected to "following", which is more appriopriate > in this context. > - I know its trivial, but can disturb the readers flow > - do you want me to change the message to "Edited for clarity" The problem is not s/follow/following/, it is the other, unrelated change you made that does not improve the text. There are reasons why we ask people not to mix multiple changes. If you submit just the "following" fix, it will surely be applied. Thanks, jon
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 12:53:18PM GMT, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> writes: > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:41:52AM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > >> > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> > >> > --- > >> > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> > > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > >> > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 > >> > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > >> > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > >> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: > >> > - Enable DMA/processing engines > >> > > >> > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, > >> > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: > >> > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: > >> > >> I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with > >> changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant > >> changes to make at the same time. > > > > - "follow" has been corrected to "following", which is more appriopriate > > in this context. > > - I know its trivial, but can disturb the readers flow > > - do you want me to change the message to "Edited for clarity" > > The problem is not s/follow/following/, it is the other, unrelated > change you made that does not improve the text. There are reasons why > we ask people not to mix multiple changes. If you submit just the > "following" fix, it will surely be applied. > > Thanks, > > jon Understood, will take care next time. I will resend this patch with: "follow" -> "following", with commit message "Fixed spelling"
On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 12:44:13AM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 12:53:18PM GMT, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> writes: > > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:41:52AM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > > >> > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. > > >> > > > >> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> > > >> > --- > > >> > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- > > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > >> > > > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > >> > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 > > >> > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > >> > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > >> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: > > >> > - Enable DMA/processing engines > > >> > > > >> > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, > > >> > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: > > >> > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: > > >> > > >> I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with > > >> changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant > > >> changes to make at the same time. > > > > > > - "follow" has been corrected to "following", which is more appriopriate > > > in this context. > > > - I know its trivial, but can disturb the readers flow > > > - do you want me to change the message to "Edited for clarity" > > > > The problem is not s/follow/following/, it is the other, unrelated > > change you made that does not improve the text. There are reasons why > > we ask people not to mix multiple changes. If you submit just the > > "following" fix, it will surely be applied. > > Understood, will take care next time. I will resend this patch with: > "follow" -> "following", with commit message "Fixed spelling" Sorry I missed the "follow" change, which is indeed worth fixing. If you resend it, make your subject and commit log say "fix" (not "fixed"), like it's a command. https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/ https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst?id=v6.9#n134
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 02:24:29PM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 07, 2024 at 12:44:13AM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 12:53:18PM GMT, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > > > Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> writes: > > > > > > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 11:41:52AM GMT, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > >> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:15:18PM +0530, Abdul Rahim wrote: > > > >> > Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. > > > >> > > > > >> > Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> > > > >> > --- > > > >> > Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- > > > >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > >> > > > > >> > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > > >> > index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 > > > >> > --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > > >> > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst > > > >> > @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: > > > >> > - Enable DMA/processing engines > > > >> > > > > >> > When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, > > > >> > -the driver needs to take the follow steps: > > > >> > +the driver needs to perform the following steps: > > > >> > > > >> I don't see a spelling fix here, and personally I wouldn't bother with > > > >> changing "take" to "perform" unless we have other more significant > > > >> changes to make at the same time. > > > > > > > > - "follow" has been corrected to "following", which is more appriopriate > > > > in this context. > > > > - I know its trivial, but can disturb the readers flow > > > > - do you want me to change the message to "Edited for clarity" > > > > > > The problem is not s/follow/following/, it is the other, unrelated > > > change you made that does not improve the text. There are reasons why > > > we ask people not to mix multiple changes. If you submit just the > > > "following" fix, it will surely be applied. > > > > Understood, will take care next time. I will resend this patch with: > > "follow" -> "following", with commit message "Fixed spelling" > > Sorry I missed the "follow" change, which is indeed worth fixing. If > you resend it, make your subject and commit log say "fix" (not > "fixed"), like it's a command. > > https://chris.beams.io/posts/git-commit/ > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/maintainer-tip.rst?id=v6.9#n134 > Thanks for reviewing, i've resent this patch here: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240906205656.8261-1-abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com/
diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst index dd7b1c0c21da..344c2c2d94f9 100644 --- a/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst +++ b/Documentation/PCI/pci.rst @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ driver generally needs to perform the following initialization: - Enable DMA/processing engines When done using the device, and perhaps the module needs to be unloaded, -the driver needs to take the follow steps: +the driver needs to perform the following steps: - Disable the device from generating IRQs - Release the IRQ (free_irq())
Fixed spelling and edited for clarity. Signed-off-by: Abdul Rahim <abdul.rahim@myyahoo.com> --- Documentation/PCI/pci.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)