Message ID | 20250108102512.3477461-1-buaajxlj@163.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Delegated to: | Ping-Ke Shih |
Headers | show |
Series | wifi: rtw89: Correct immediate cfg_len calculation for scan_offload_be | expand |
Liang Jie <buaajxlj@163.com> wrote: > From: Liang Jie <liangjie@lixiang.com> > > This patch ensures the correct calculation of `cfg_len` prior to the No "This patch". Just in imperative tense -- "Ensure ..." > allocation of the skb in the `rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be` function, > particularly when the `SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0` firmware feature is enabled. > It addresses an issue where an incorrect skb size might be allocated > due to a delayed setting of `cfg_len`, potentially leading to memory > inefficiencies. > > By moving the conditional check and assignment of `cfg_len` before skb > allocation, the patch guarantees that `len`, which depends on `cfg_len`, > is accurately computed, ensuring proper skb size and preventing any > unnecessary memory reservation for firmware operations not supporting > beyond the `w8` member of the command data structure. > > This correction helps to optimize memory usage and maintain consistent > behavior across different firmware versions. > > Fixes: 6ca6b918f280 ("wifi: rtw89: 8922a: Add new fields for scan offload H2C command") > No this blank line. > Signed-off-by: Liang Jie <liangjie@lixiang.com> > --- > drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c | 11 +++++++---- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c > index 2191c037d72e..5eb4beb9e485 100644 > --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c > +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c > @@ -5169,7 +5169,7 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, > u8 macc_role_size = sizeof(*macc_role) * option->num_macc_role; > u8 opch_size = sizeof(*opch) * option->num_opch; > u8 probe_id[NUM_NL80211_BANDS]; > - u8 cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); > + u8 cfg_len; In fact, SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0 means `old` format used by `old' firmware version, which isn't a main flow. I prefer to keep here unchanged, and modify cfg_len along with SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0 for v0 firmware. As existing patterns, this will be u8 cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); u8 ver = U8_MAX; if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) ver = 0; ... if (ver == 0) cfg_len = offsetofend(typeof(*h2c), w8); ... if (ver == 0) goto flex_member; ... > unsigned int cond; > void *ptr; > int ret; > @@ -5178,6 +5178,11 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, > > rtw89_scan_get_6g_disabled_chan(rtwdev, option); > > + if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) > + cfg_len = offsetofend(typeof(*h2c), w8); > + else > + cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); > + > len = cfg_len + macc_role_size + opch_size; > skb = rtw89_fw_h2c_alloc_skb_with_hdr(rtwdev, len); > if (!skb) { > @@ -5246,10 +5251,8 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, > RTW89_H2C_SCANOFLD_BE_W8_PROBE_RATE_6GHZ); > } > > - if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) { > - cfg_len = offsetofend(typeof(*h2c), w8); > + if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) > goto flex_member; > - } > > h2c->w9 = le32_encode_bits(sizeof(*h2c) / sizeof(h2c->w0), > RTW89_H2C_SCANOFLD_BE_W9_SIZE_CFG) | > -- > 2.25.1
On Thu, 9 Jan 2025 00:35:38 +0000, Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote: > Liang Jie <buaajxlj@163.com> wrote: > > From: Liang Jie <liangjie@lixiang.com> > > > > This patch ensures the correct calculation of `cfg_len` prior to the > > No "This patch". Just in imperative tense -- "Ensure ..." > > > allocation of the skb in the `rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be` function, > > > > ... > > > > behavior across different firmware versions. > > > > Fixes: 6ca6b918f280 ("wifi: rtw89: 8922a: Add new fields for scan offload H2C command") > > > > No this blank line. > > > Signed-off-by: Liang Jie <liangjie@lixiang.com> > > --- > > > > ... > > > > u8 probe_id[NUM_NL80211_BANDS]; > > - u8 cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); > > + u8 cfg_len; > > In fact, SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0 means `old` format used by `old' firmware version, > which isn't a main flow. I prefer to keep here unchanged, and modify cfg_len > along with SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0 for v0 firmware. > > As existing patterns, this will be > > u8 cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); > u8 ver = U8_MAX; > > if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) > ver = 0; > > ... > > if (ver == 0) > cfg_len = offsetofend(typeof(*h2c), w8); > > ... > > if (ver == 0) > goto flex_member; > > ... > > > > unsigned int cond; > > void *ptr; > > int ret; > > > > ... > > > > 2.25.1 Thank you very much for your suggestions. I will incorporate them and submit [PATCH v2] accordingly. Best regards, Liang Jie
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c index 2191c037d72e..5eb4beb9e485 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c @@ -5169,7 +5169,7 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, u8 macc_role_size = sizeof(*macc_role) * option->num_macc_role; u8 opch_size = sizeof(*opch) * option->num_opch; u8 probe_id[NUM_NL80211_BANDS]; - u8 cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); + u8 cfg_len; unsigned int cond; void *ptr; int ret; @@ -5178,6 +5178,11 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, rtw89_scan_get_6g_disabled_chan(rtwdev, option); + if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) + cfg_len = offsetofend(typeof(*h2c), w8); + else + cfg_len = sizeof(*h2c); + len = cfg_len + macc_role_size + opch_size; skb = rtw89_fw_h2c_alloc_skb_with_hdr(rtwdev, len); if (!skb) { @@ -5246,10 +5251,8 @@ int rtw89_fw_h2c_scan_offload_be(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, RTW89_H2C_SCANOFLD_BE_W8_PROBE_RATE_6GHZ); } - if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) { - cfg_len = offsetofend(typeof(*h2c), w8); + if (RTW89_CHK_FW_FEATURE(SCAN_OFFLOAD_BE_V0, &rtwdev->fw)) goto flex_member; - } h2c->w9 = le32_encode_bits(sizeof(*h2c) / sizeof(h2c->w0), RTW89_H2C_SCANOFLD_BE_W9_SIZE_CFG) |