diff mbox

[V2,03/10] pinctrl: exynos: add exynos5260 SoC specific data

Message ID 1389099548-14649-4-git-send-email-rahul.sharma@samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Rahul Sharma Jan. 7, 2014, 12:59 p.m. UTC
From: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>

Add Samsung Exynos5260 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl
support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5260.

Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@samsung.com>
---
 .../bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt           |    1 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c                   |   82 ++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c                  |    2 +
 drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h                  |    1 +
 4 files changed, 86 insertions(+)

Comments

Arnd Bergmann Jan. 7, 2014, 1:31 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:29:01 Rahul Sharma wrote:
> From: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>
> 
> Add Samsung Exynos5260 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl
> support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5260.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@samsung.com>

On a similar note to the comment about the platform patch, I think
it would be good to extend the DT binding in a way that allows
you to describe the differences between the SoCs without having
to change the driver every time a new model comes out.

We still have to maintain backwards compatibility with the
existing bindings I suppose, but I'd rather not see new ones
added like this. I realize that there is a tradeoff between
having too much information in DT when it is always fixed, and
having too much hardcoded in the driver, and at some point there
was a conscious decision to do it like this, but I fear the
tradeoff has changed with the number of EXYNOS implementations
that really only differ in their pin banks.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Tomasz Figa Jan. 23, 2014, 6:38 p.m. UTC | #2
On 07.01.2014 14:31, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 January 2014 18:29:01 Rahul Sharma wrote:
>> From: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>
>>
>> Add Samsung Exynos5260 SoC specific data to enable pinctrl
>> support for all platforms based on EXYNOS5260.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Dubey <pankaj.dubey@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Young-Gun Jang <yg1004.jang@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@samsung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Arun Kumar K <arun.kk@samsung.com>
>
> On a similar note to the comment about the platform patch, I think
> it would be good to extend the DT binding in a way that allows
> you to describe the differences between the SoCs without having
> to change the driver every time a new model comes out.
>
> We still have to maintain backwards compatibility with the
> existing bindings I suppose, but I'd rather not see new ones
> added like this. I realize that there is a tradeoff between
> having too much information in DT when it is always fixed, and
> having too much hardcoded in the driver, and at some point there
> was a conscious decision to do it like this, but I fear the
> tradeoff has changed with the number of EXYNOS implementations
> that really only differ in their pin banks.

There isn't really too much data being added to the driver on per-SoC 
basis. Anyway, I remember that when I was trying to move all the data to 
DT long time ago when refactoring the driver, after a long discussion on 
the ML it was decided that it is not really a good idea and so we have 
the end result as we can see now.

Personally I'd prefer all the static data of struct samsung_pin_bank to 
be located in DT, with each bank having a compatible string that would 
translate to appropriate struct samsung_pin_bank_type, which is common 
across multiple SoCs (basically all >= S5PV210), and parameters such as 
pin-count, control-base, and geint-/weint-base (which would also imply 
interrupt type) - name (which is used only for human readable text) 
could be implied by node names. However that would mean quite 
significant effort (and churn), especially considering the fact that we 
need to maintain compatibility with existing bindings, due to "ABI 
stability" (which I'm slowly losing my faith in), so I don't think it's 
worth it.

So, from me:

Acked-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@samsung.com>

Best regards,
Tomasz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-samsung-soc" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
index 257677d..2b32783 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pinctrl/samsung-pinctrl.txt
@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@  Required Properties:
   - "samsung,exynos4210-pinctrl": for Exynos4210 compatible pin-controller.
   - "samsung,exynos4x12-pinctrl": for Exynos4x12 compatible pin-controller.
   - "samsung,exynos5250-pinctrl": for Exynos5250 compatible pin-controller.
+  - "samsung,exynos5260-pinctrl": for Exynos5260 compatible pin-controller.
   - "samsung,exynos5420-pinctrl": for Exynos5420 compatible pin-controller.
 
 - reg: Base address of the pin controller hardware module and length of
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
index 155b1b3..07c8130 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-exynos.c
@@ -1042,6 +1042,88 @@  struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5250_pin_ctrl[] = {
 	},
 };
 
+/* pin banks of exynos5260 pin-controller 0 */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5260_pin_banks0[] = {
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x000, "gpa0", 0x00),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x020, "gpa1", 0x04),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x040, "gpa2", 0x08),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x060, "gpb0", 0x0c),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x080, "gpb1", 0x10),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x0a0, "gpb2", 0x14),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x0c0, "gpb3", 0x18),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x0e0, "gpb4", 0x1c),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x100, "gpb5", 0x20),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x120, "gpd0", 0x24),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x140, "gpd1", 0x28),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x160, "gpd2", 0x2c),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x180, "gpe0", 0x30),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(5, 0x1a0, "gpe1", 0x34),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x1c0, "gpf0", 0x38),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x1e0, "gpf1", 0x3c),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(2, 0x200, "gpk0", 0x40),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xc00, "gpx0", 0x00),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xc20, "gpx1", 0x04),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xc40, "gpx2", 0x08),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTW(8, 0xc60, "gpx3", 0x0c),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos5260 pin-controller 1 */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5260_pin_banks1[] = {
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x000, "gpc0", 0x00),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(6, 0x020, "gpc1", 0x04),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x040, "gpc2", 0x08),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x060, "gpc3", 0x0c),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x080, "gpc4", 0x10),
+};
+
+/* pin banks of exynos5260 pin-controller 2 */
+static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5260_pin_banks2[] = {
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(7, 0x000, "gpz0", 0x00),
+	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(4, 0x020, "gpz1", 0x04),
+};
+
+/*
+ * Samsung pinctrl driver data for Exynos5260 SoC. Exynos5260 SoC includes
+ * three gpio/pin-mux/pinconfig controllers.
+ */
+struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5260_pin_ctrl[] = {
+	{
+		/* pin-controller instance 0 data */
+		.pin_banks	= exynos5260_pin_banks0,
+		.nr_banks	= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5260_pin_banks0),
+		.geint_con	= EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET,
+		.geint_mask	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET,
+		.geint_pend	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EPEND_OFFSET,
+		.weint_con	= EXYNOS_WKUP_ECON_OFFSET,
+		.weint_mask	= EXYNOS_WKUP_EMASK_OFFSET,
+		.weint_pend	= EXYNOS_WKUP_EPEND_OFFSET,
+		.svc		= EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET,
+		.eint_gpio_init = exynos_eint_gpio_init,
+		.eint_wkup_init = exynos_eint_wkup_init,
+		.label		= "exynos5260-gpio-ctrl0",
+	}, {
+		/* pin-controller instance 1 data */
+		.pin_banks	= exynos5260_pin_banks1,
+		.nr_banks	= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5260_pin_banks1),
+		.geint_con	= EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET,
+		.geint_mask	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET,
+		.geint_pend	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EPEND_OFFSET,
+		.svc		= EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET,
+		.eint_gpio_init = exynos_eint_gpio_init,
+		.label		= "exynos5260-gpio-ctrl1",
+	}, {
+		/* pin-controller instance 2 data */
+		.pin_banks	= exynos5260_pin_banks2,
+		.nr_banks	= ARRAY_SIZE(exynos5260_pin_banks2),
+		.geint_con	= EXYNOS_GPIO_ECON_OFFSET,
+		.geint_mask	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EMASK_OFFSET,
+		.geint_pend	= EXYNOS_GPIO_EPEND_OFFSET,
+		.svc		= EXYNOS_SVC_OFFSET,
+		.eint_gpio_init = exynos_eint_gpio_init,
+		.label		= "exynos5260-gpio-ctrl2",
+	},
+};
+
 /* pin banks of exynos5420 pin-controller 0 */
 static struct samsung_pin_bank exynos5420_pin_banks0[] = {
 	EXYNOS_PIN_BANK_EINTG(8, 0x000, "gpy7", 0x00),
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
index 47ec2e8..0324d4c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.c
@@ -1120,6 +1120,8 @@  static const struct of_device_id samsung_pinctrl_dt_match[] = {
 		.data = (void *)exynos4x12_pin_ctrl },
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5250-pinctrl",
 		.data = (void *)exynos5250_pin_ctrl },
+	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5260-pinctrl",
+		.data = (void *)exynos5260_pin_ctrl },
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,exynos5420-pinctrl",
 		.data = (void *)exynos5420_pin_ctrl },
 	{ .compatible = "samsung,s5pv210-pinctrl",
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h
index 30622d9..bab9c21 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-samsung.h
@@ -254,6 +254,7 @@  struct samsung_pmx_func {
 extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos4210_pin_ctrl[];
 extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos4x12_pin_ctrl[];
 extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5250_pin_ctrl[];
+extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5260_pin_ctrl[];
 extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl exynos5420_pin_ctrl[];
 extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c64xx_pin_ctrl[];
 extern struct samsung_pin_ctrl s3c2412_pin_ctrl[];