Message ID | 20140109082858.GE27160@core.coreip.homeip.net (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
On 01/09/2014 12:28 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:04:54AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:18:39PM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote: >>> This is a trivial change to replace the sprintf loop with snprintf using >>> up-to-date format capability. >> >> Hmm, how about we do this instead: > > And another small one... > > Input: synaptics-rmi4 - transport name should be a const pointer > > From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> Looks good to me. I think the correct protocol is to Ack the patch, so... Acked-by: Christopher Heiny <cheiny@synaptics.com> > --- > drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h | 2 +- > drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c | 4 +--- > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h > index 65dd934..3e8b57a 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h > @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct rmi_driver { > * @att_count Number of times ATTN assertions have been handled. > */ > struct rmi_transport_info { > - char *proto; > + const char *proto; > long tx_count; > long tx_bytes; > long tx_errs; > diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c > index ea01823..ebe74ec 100644 > --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c > +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c > @@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ struct rmi_i2c_data { > #define RMI_PAGE_SELECT_REGISTER 0xff > #define RMI_I2C_PAGE(addr) (((addr) >> 8) & 0xff) > > -static char *xport_proto_name = "i2c"; > - > /* > * rmi_set_page - Set RMI page > * @xport: The pointer to the rmi_transport_dev struct > @@ -217,7 +215,7 @@ static int rmi_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client, > > xport->write_block = rmi_i2c_write_block; > xport->read_block = rmi_i2c_read_block; > - xport->info.proto = xport_proto_name; > + xport->info.proto = "i2c"; > > mutex_init(&data->page_mutex); > >
Christopher Heiny <cheiny@synaptics.com> wrote: >On 01/09/2014 12:28 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:04:54AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:18:39PM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote: >>>> This is a trivial change to replace the sprintf loop with snprintf >using >>>> up-to-date format capability. >>> >>> Hmm, how about we do this instead: >> >> And another small one... >> >> Input: synaptics-rmi4 - transport name should be a const pointer >> >> From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> >> >> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> > >Looks good to me. I think the correct protocol is to Ack the patch, >so... > >Acked-by: Christopher Heiny <cheiny@synaptics.com> Both or only the const name one? > > >> --- >> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h | 2 +- >> drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c | 4 +--- >> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h >b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h >> index 65dd934..3e8b57a 100644 >> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h >> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h >> @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct rmi_driver { >> * @att_count Number of times ATTN assertions have been handled. >> */ >> struct rmi_transport_info { >> - char *proto; >> + const char *proto; >> long tx_count; >> long tx_bytes; >> long tx_errs; >> diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c >b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c >> index ea01823..ebe74ec 100644 >> --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c >> +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c >> @@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ struct rmi_i2c_data { >> #define RMI_PAGE_SELECT_REGISTER 0xff >> #define RMI_I2C_PAGE(addr) (((addr) >> 8) & 0xff) >> >> -static char *xport_proto_name = "i2c"; >> - >> /* >> * rmi_set_page - Set RMI page >> * @xport: The pointer to the rmi_transport_dev struct >> @@ -217,7 +215,7 @@ static int rmi_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client >*client, >> >> xport->write_block = rmi_i2c_write_block; >> xport->read_block = rmi_i2c_read_block; >> - xport->info.proto = xport_proto_name; >> + xport->info.proto = "i2c"; >> >> mutex_init(&data->page_mutex); >> >>
On 01/09/2014 12:48 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Christopher Heiny<cheiny@synaptics.com> wrote: >> >On 01/09/2014 12:28 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>> >>On Thu, Jan 09, 2014 at 12:04:54AM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: >>>> >>>On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 05:18:39PM -0800, Christopher Heiny wrote: >>>>> >>>>This is a trivial change to replace the sprintf loop with snprintf >> >using >>>>> >>>>up-to-date format capability. >>>> >>> >>>> >>>Hmm, how about we do this instead: >>> >> >>> >>And another small one... >>> >> >>> >>Input: synaptics-rmi4 - transport name should be a const pointer >>> >> >>> >>From: Dmitry Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> >>> >> >>> >>Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov<dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> >> > >> >Looks good to me. I think the correct protocol is to Ack the patch, >> >so... >> > >> >Acked-by: Christopher Heiny<cheiny@synaptics.com> > Both or only the const name one? > The const name one only at this point. I have a couple of comments on the debug output, one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h index 65dd934..3e8b57a 100644 --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_bus.h @@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ struct rmi_driver { * @att_count Number of times ATTN assertions have been handled. */ struct rmi_transport_info { - char *proto; + const char *proto; long tx_count; long tx_bytes; long tx_errs; diff --git a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c index ea01823..ebe74ec 100644 --- a/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c +++ b/drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_i2c.c @@ -38,8 +38,6 @@ struct rmi_i2c_data { #define RMI_PAGE_SELECT_REGISTER 0xff #define RMI_I2C_PAGE(addr) (((addr) >> 8) & 0xff) -static char *xport_proto_name = "i2c"; - /* * rmi_set_page - Set RMI page * @xport: The pointer to the rmi_transport_dev struct @@ -217,7 +215,7 @@ static int rmi_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *client, xport->write_block = rmi_i2c_write_block; xport->read_block = rmi_i2c_read_block; - xport->info.proto = xport_proto_name; + xport->info.proto = "i2c"; mutex_init(&data->page_mutex);