diff mbox

[RFC,v5,01/12] ath10k: add struct ath10k_bus_params

Message ID 20180603182029.8914-2-erik.stromdahl@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show

Commit Message

Erik Stromdahl June 3, 2018, 6:20 p.m. UTC
This struct is used as argument to ath10k_core_register in order to
make it easier to add more bus parameters in the future.

Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c  |  8 ++++----
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c |  5 +++--
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h |  7 ++++++-
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c  | 12 ++++++------
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c |  7 ++++---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c |  4 +++-
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/usb.c  |  6 +++---
 7 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo Sept. 6, 2018, 4:16 p.m. UTC | #1
Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> wrote:

> This struct is used as argument to ath10k_core_register in order to
> make it easier to add more bus parameters in the future.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>

12 patches applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.

c0d8d565787c ath10k: add struct ath10k_bus_params
7c2dd6154fc2 ath10k: add device type enum to ath10k_bus_params
367c899f622c ath10k: add bus type check in ath10k_init_hw_params
9faaa14387fb ath10k: use hw_params.num_peers for num_tids in TLV init
4875e0b52085 ath10k: add per target config of max_num_peers
e66d5361127a ath10k: DMA related fixes for high latency devices
852d1bf86a5b ath10k: add HTT TX HL ops
d4e7f553eec3 ath10k: add HTT RX HL ops
4daacc950d4d ath10k: htt: RX ring config HL support
a2097d6444c3 ath10k: htt: High latency TX support
f88d49345040 ath10k: htt: High latency RX support
37f62c0d5822 ath10k: wmi: disable softirq's while calling ieee80211_rx
Erik Stromdahl Sept. 6, 2018, 6:22 p.m. UTC | #2
Hi Kalle,

On 9/6/18 6:16 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
> Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> This struct is used as argument to ath10k_core_register in order to
>> make it easier to add more bus parameters in the future.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
> 
> 12 patches applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
> 
> c0d8d565787c ath10k: add struct ath10k_bus_params
> 7c2dd6154fc2 ath10k: add device type enum to ath10k_bus_params
> 367c899f622c ath10k: add bus type check in ath10k_init_hw_params
> 9faaa14387fb ath10k: use hw_params.num_peers for num_tids in TLV init
> 4875e0b52085 ath10k: add per target config of max_num_peers
> e66d5361127a ath10k: DMA related fixes for high latency devices
> 852d1bf86a5b ath10k: add HTT TX HL ops
> d4e7f553eec3 ath10k: add HTT RX HL ops
> 4daacc950d4d ath10k: htt: RX ring config HL support
> a2097d6444c3 ath10k: htt: High latency TX support
> f88d49345040 ath10k: htt: High latency RX support
> 37f62c0d5822 ath10k: wmi: disable softirq's while calling ieee80211_rx
> 

I am afraid that one of the patches in this series causes a regression for PCI devices :(

The patch is:

4875e0b52085 ath10k: add per target config of max_num_peers

With this patch I got an error during driver load.
Reverting the patch solved the problem.

I discovered this yesterday when I was setting up a test AP with an ath10k pcie device.
I thought it would be a good idea to use my own tree just to make sure it works with PCI, and apparently it didn't work.
I did some bisecting and the patch mentioned above turned out to be the culprit.
I have not looked into why it fails yet (I think it is related to a bad num_peers value in the ath10k_hw_params_list array),
I just noticed that reverting the patch solved the problem

I was actually planning on submitting a v6 series with this patch removed, but you were faster.

I'll get back with more details about the error.

The device I have been using is QCA9880 based: Compex WLE900VX

--
Erik
Kalle Valo Oct. 6, 2018, 11:34 a.m. UTC | #3
Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> writes:

> On 9/6/18 6:16 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This struct is used as argument to ath10k_core_register in order to
>>> make it easier to add more bus parameters in the future.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Erik Stromdahl <erik.stromdahl@gmail.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> 12 patches applied to ath-next branch of ath.git, thanks.
>>
>> c0d8d565787c ath10k: add struct ath10k_bus_params
>> 7c2dd6154fc2 ath10k: add device type enum to ath10k_bus_params
>> 367c899f622c ath10k: add bus type check in ath10k_init_hw_params
>> 9faaa14387fb ath10k: use hw_params.num_peers for num_tids in TLV init
>> 4875e0b52085 ath10k: add per target config of max_num_peers
>> e66d5361127a ath10k: DMA related fixes for high latency devices
>> 852d1bf86a5b ath10k: add HTT TX HL ops
>> d4e7f553eec3 ath10k: add HTT RX HL ops
>> 4daacc950d4d ath10k: htt: RX ring config HL support
>> a2097d6444c3 ath10k: htt: High latency TX support
>> f88d49345040 ath10k: htt: High latency RX support
>> 37f62c0d5822 ath10k: wmi: disable softirq's while calling ieee80211_rx
>>
>
> I am afraid that one of the patches in this series causes a regression
> for PCI devices :(
>
> The patch is:
>
> 4875e0b52085 ath10k: add per target config of max_num_peers
>
> With this patch I got an error during driver load.
> Reverting the patch solved the problem.
>
> I discovered this yesterday when I was setting up a test AP with an
> ath10k pcie device.
> I thought it would be a good idea to use my own tree just to make sure
> it works with PCI, and apparently it didn't work.
> I did some bisecting and the patch mentioned above turned out to be the culprit.
> I have not looked into why it fails yet (I think it is related to a
> bad num_peers value in the ath10k_hw_params_list array),
> I just noticed that reverting the patch solved the problem
>
> I was actually planning on submitting a v6 series with this patch
> removed, but you were faster.

Yeah, sorry about this. I noticed you marked the patchset as RFC but as
they looked so good I decided to take them anyway :)

But thanks for the quick fixes which I have applied and I think
everything is good now, right?
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
index fa39ffffd34d..5e272e940efd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/ahb.c
@@ -755,7 +755,7 @@  static int ath10k_ahb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	enum ath10k_hw_rev hw_rev;
 	size_t size;
 	int ret;
-	u32 chip_id;
+	struct ath10k_bus_params bus_params;
 
 	of_id = of_match_device(ath10k_ahb_of_match, &pdev->dev);
 	if (!of_id) {
@@ -811,14 +811,14 @@  static int ath10k_ahb_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	ath10k_pci_ce_deinit(ar);
 
-	chip_id = ath10k_ahb_soc_read32(ar, SOC_CHIP_ID_ADDRESS);
-	if (chip_id == 0xffffffff) {
+	bus_params.chip_id = ath10k_ahb_soc_read32(ar, SOC_CHIP_ID_ADDRESS);
+	if (bus_params.chip_id == 0xffffffff) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get chip id\n");
 		ret = -ENODEV;
 		goto err_halt_device;
 	}
 
-	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, chip_id);
+	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, &bus_params);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to register driver core: %d\n", ret);
 		goto err_halt_device;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
index 4cf54a7ef09a..eee6e39e4e99 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.c
@@ -2702,9 +2702,10 @@  static void ath10k_core_register_work(struct work_struct *work)
 	return;
 }
 
-int ath10k_core_register(struct ath10k *ar, u32 chip_id)
+int ath10k_core_register(struct ath10k *ar,
+			 const struct ath10k_bus_params *bus_params)
 {
-	ar->chip_id = chip_id;
+	ar->chip_id = bus_params->chip_id;
 	queue_work(ar->workqueue, &ar->register_work);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
index 951dbdd1c9eb..6dd68df104e4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
@@ -874,6 +874,10 @@  struct ath10k_per_peer_tx_stats {
 	u32	reserved2;
 };
 
+struct ath10k_bus_params {
+	u32 chip_id;
+};
+
 struct ath10k {
 	struct ath_common ath_common;
 	struct ieee80211_hw *hw;
@@ -1161,7 +1165,8 @@  int ath10k_core_start(struct ath10k *ar, enum ath10k_firmware_mode mode,
 		      const struct ath10k_fw_components *fw_components);
 int ath10k_wait_for_suspend(struct ath10k *ar, u32 suspend_opt);
 void ath10k_core_stop(struct ath10k *ar);
-int ath10k_core_register(struct ath10k *ar, u32 chip_id);
+int ath10k_core_register(struct ath10k *ar,
+			 const struct ath10k_bus_params *bus_params);
 void ath10k_core_unregister(struct ath10k *ar);
 
 #endif /* _CORE_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
index af2cf55c4c1e..7b5b93f48ba2 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/pci.c
@@ -3482,7 +3482,7 @@  static int ath10k_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 	struct ath10k *ar;
 	struct ath10k_pci *ar_pci;
 	enum ath10k_hw_rev hw_rev;
-	u32 chip_id;
+	struct ath10k_bus_params bus_params;
 	bool pci_ps;
 	int (*pci_soft_reset)(struct ath10k *ar);
 	int (*pci_hard_reset)(struct ath10k *ar);
@@ -3618,19 +3618,19 @@  static int ath10k_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pdev,
 		goto err_free_irq;
 	}
 
-	chip_id = ath10k_pci_soc_read32(ar, SOC_CHIP_ID_ADDRESS);
-	if (chip_id == 0xffffffff) {
+	bus_params.chip_id = ath10k_pci_soc_read32(ar, SOC_CHIP_ID_ADDRESS);
+	if (bus_params.chip_id == 0xffffffff) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to get chip id\n");
 		goto err_free_irq;
 	}
 
-	if (!ath10k_pci_chip_is_supported(pdev->device, chip_id)) {
+	if (!ath10k_pci_chip_is_supported(pdev->device, bus_params.chip_id)) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "device %04x with chip_id %08x isn't supported\n",
-			   pdev->device, chip_id);
+			   pdev->device, bus_params.chip_id);
 		goto err_free_irq;
 	}
 
-	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, chip_id);
+	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, &bus_params);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to register driver core: %d\n", ret);
 		goto err_free_irq;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
index d612ce8c9cff..be61d868edcf 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/sdio.c
@@ -1931,7 +1931,8 @@  static int ath10k_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
 	struct ath10k_sdio *ar_sdio;
 	struct ath10k *ar;
 	enum ath10k_hw_rev hw_rev;
-	u32 chip_id, dev_id_base;
+	u32 dev_id_base;
+	struct ath10k_bus_params bus_params;
 	int ret, i;
 
 	/* Assumption: All SDIO based chipsets (so far) are QCA6174 based.
@@ -2026,8 +2027,8 @@  static int ath10k_sdio_probe(struct sdio_func *func,
 	}
 
 	/* TODO: don't know yet how to get chip_id with SDIO */
-	chip_id = 0;
-	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, chip_id);
+	bus_params.chip_id = 0;
+	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, &bus_params);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to register driver core: %d\n", ret);
 		goto err_free_wq;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
index a3a7042fe13a..46d2a7a21efb 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c
@@ -1273,6 +1273,7 @@  static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct ath10k *ar;
 	int ret;
 	u32 i;
+	struct ath10k_bus_params bus_params;
 
 	of_id = of_match_device(ath10k_snoc_dt_match, &pdev->dev);
 	if (!of_id) {
@@ -1340,7 +1341,8 @@  static int ath10k_snoc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 		goto err_free_irq;
 	}
 
-	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, drv_data->hw_rev);
+	bus_params.chip_id = drv_data->hw_rev;
+	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, &bus_params);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_err(ar, "failed to register driver core: %d\n", ret);
 		goto err_hw_power_off;
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/usb.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/usb.c
index d4803ff5a78a..275e00bafcb1 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/usb.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/usb.c
@@ -983,7 +983,7 @@  static int ath10k_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
 	struct usb_device *dev = interface_to_usbdev(interface);
 	int ret, vendor_id, product_id;
 	enum ath10k_hw_rev hw_rev;
-	u32 chip_id;
+	struct ath10k_bus_params bus_params;
 
 	/* Assumption: All USB based chipsets (so far) are QCA9377 based.
 	 * If there will be newer chipsets that does not use the hw reg
@@ -1017,8 +1017,8 @@  static int ath10k_usb_probe(struct usb_interface *interface,
 	ar->id.device = product_id;
 
 	/* TODO: don't know yet how to get chip_id with USB */
-	chip_id = 0;
-	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, chip_id);
+	bus_params.chip_id = 0;
+	ret = ath10k_core_register(ar, &bus_params);
 	if (ret) {
 		ath10k_warn(ar, "failed to register driver core: %d\n", ret);
 		goto err;