diff mbox series

mac80211: don't warn about CW params when not using them

Message ID 20190718015712.197499-1-briannorris@chromium.org (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Delegated to: Johannes Berg
Headers show
Series mac80211: don't warn about CW params when not using them | expand

Commit Message

Brian Norris July 18, 2019, 1:57 a.m. UTC
ieee80211_set_wmm_default() normally sets up the initial CW min/max for
each queue, except that it skips doing this if the driver doesn't
support ->conf_tx. We still end up calling drv_conf_tx() in some cases
(e.g., ieee80211_reconfig()), which also still won't do anything
useful...except it complains here about the invalid CW parameters.

Let's just skip the WARN if we weren't going to do anything useful with
the parameters.

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
---
Noticed because rtw88 does not currently implement .conf_tx()

I think there are several ways to slice this one. I picked one fix,
which may not be the best one.

 net/mac80211/driver-ops.c | 13 +++++++++----
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Stanislaw Gruszka July 18, 2019, 7:45 a.m. UTC | #1
On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 06:57:12PM -0700, Brian Norris wrote:
> ieee80211_set_wmm_default() normally sets up the initial CW min/max for
> each queue, except that it skips doing this if the driver doesn't
> support ->conf_tx. We still end up calling drv_conf_tx() in some cases
> (e.g., ieee80211_reconfig()), which also still won't do anything
> useful...except it complains here about the invalid CW parameters.
> 
> Let's just skip the WARN if we weren't going to do anything useful with
> the parameters.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org>
> ---
> Noticed because rtw88 does not currently implement .conf_tx()
> 
> I think there are several ways to slice this one. I picked one fix,
> which may not be the best one.

Fix looks fine for me. However I think rtw88 should implement
drv_conf_tx() because parameters can be different on different
network setups and maybe more important WMM/AC parameters become
quite recently part of ETSI regulatory.

Stanislaw
Brian Norris July 18, 2019, 3:48 p.m. UTC | #2
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019 at 12:45 AM Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@redhat.com> wrote:
> Fix looks fine for me. However I think rtw88 should implement
> drv_conf_tx() because parameters can be different on different
> network setups and maybe more important WMM/AC parameters become
> quite recently part of ETSI regulatory.

Ack. I just figured we should stay consistent with the WARNINGs (and
we both noticed this one on earlier patch reviews). I don't know about
you, but for me, the whole wireless stack is so full of WARNINGs that
my crash reporter system separately classifies net/wireless and
drivers/net/wireless/ from the rest of the kernel when categorizing
automated problem reports. (And...most developers then ignore them.)

But I digress ;)

Brian
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/net/mac80211/driver-ops.c b/net/mac80211/driver-ops.c
index acd4afb4944b..c9a8a2433e8a 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/driver-ops.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/driver-ops.c
@@ -187,11 +187,16 @@  int drv_conf_tx(struct ieee80211_local *local,
 	if (!check_sdata_in_driver(sdata))
 		return -EIO;
 
-	if (WARN_ONCE(params->cw_min == 0 ||
-		      params->cw_min > params->cw_max,
-		      "%s: invalid CW_min/CW_max: %d/%d\n",
-		      sdata->name, params->cw_min, params->cw_max))
+	if (params->cw_min == 0 || params->cw_min > params->cw_max) {
+		/*
+		 * If we can't configure hardware anyway, don't warn. We may
+		 * never have initialized the CW parameters.
+		 */
+		WARN_ONCE(local->ops->conf_tx,
+			  "%s: invalid CW_min/CW_max: %d/%d\n",
+			  sdata->name, params->cw_min, params->cw_max);
 		return -EINVAL;
+	}
 
 	trace_drv_conf_tx(local, sdata, ac, params);
 	if (local->ops->conf_tx)