[RFC,1/2] ath10k: report survey info as accumulated values
diff mbox series

Message ID 20190918124259.17804-2-sven@narfation.org
State RFC
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show
Series
  • ath10k: provide survey info as accumulated data
Related show

Commit Message

Sven Eckelmann Sept. 18, 2019, 12:42 p.m. UTC
From: Sven Eckelmann <seckelmann@datto.com>

The survey report is expected to contain a counter which is increasing all
the time. But ath10k reports some kind of delta. This can either be the
difference to the last get_survey or the difference to some even older
get_survey because the values are sometimes cached and sometimes
overwritten.

To make the returned values useful, they must be accumulated manually by
ath10k before send out to the upper layers. Special care must be taken when
accepting values from older firmware versions (which use
ATH10K_HW_CC_WRAP_SHIFTED_ALL) because they will not clear the cycle_busy
and cycle_total counter and will only use 31 bit of the 64 but counter.

Tested on QCA988x hw2.0 10.2.4-1.0-00043
Tested on QCA99x0 hw2.0 10.4.1.00030-1
Tested in QCA4019 hw1.0 10.4-3.5.3-00057

Signed-off-by: Sven Eckelmann <seckelmann@datto.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h |  2 +
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c   | 13 +++--
 drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c  | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

Comments

Kalle Valo Oct. 11, 2019, 8:41 a.m. UTC | #1
Sven Eckelmann <sven@narfation.org> writes:

> From: Sven Eckelmann <seckelmann@datto.com>
>
> The survey report is expected to contain a counter which is increasing all
> the time. But ath10k reports some kind of delta. This can either be the
> difference to the last get_survey or the difference to some even older
> get_survey because the values are sometimes cached and sometimes
> overwritten.
>
> To make the returned values useful, they must be accumulated manually by
> ath10k before send out to the upper layers. Special care must be taken when
> accepting values from older firmware versions (which use
> ATH10K_HW_CC_WRAP_SHIFTED_ALL) because they will not clear the cycle_busy
> and cycle_total counter and will only use 31 bit of the 64 but counter.

Please clarify a bit more which older firmware versions you are talking
about, we have so many of them :) I assume you are talking about _all_
QCA988X and QCA9887 firmware versions, but it would be nice to clarify
that in the commit log.

Patch
diff mbox series

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
index 4d7db07db6ba..25c699f3a73b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/core.h
@@ -1127,6 +1127,8 @@  struct ath10k {
 	u32 survey_last_rx_clear_count;
 	u32 survey_last_cycle_count;
 	struct survey_info survey[ATH10K_NUM_CHANS];
+	u64 survey_last_total_cc[ATH10K_NUM_CHANS];
+	u64 survey_last_busy_cc[ATH10K_NUM_CHANS];
 
 	/* Channel info events are expected to come in pairs without and with
 	 * COMPLETE flag set respectively for each channel visit during scan.
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c
index c415e971735b..68ffdb8b8eaa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/hw.c
@@ -548,9 +548,10 @@  void ath10k_hw_fill_survey_time(struct ath10k *ar, struct survey_info *survey,
 	u32 cc_fix = 0;
 	u32 rcc_fix = 0;
 	enum ath10k_hw_cc_wraparound_type wraparound_type;
+	u32 filled = 0;
 
-	survey->filled |= SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
-			  SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY;
+	filled |= SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
+		  SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY;
 
 	wraparound_type = ar->hw_params.cc_wraparound_type;
 
@@ -559,7 +560,7 @@  void ath10k_hw_fill_survey_time(struct ath10k *ar, struct survey_info *survey,
 		case ATH10K_HW_CC_WRAP_SHIFTED_ALL:
 			if (cc < cc_prev) {
 				cc_fix = 0x7fffffff;
-				survey->filled &= ~SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY;
+				filled &= ~SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY;
 			}
 			break;
 		case ATH10K_HW_CC_WRAP_SHIFTED_EACH:
@@ -577,8 +578,10 @@  void ath10k_hw_fill_survey_time(struct ath10k *ar, struct survey_info *survey,
 	cc -= cc_prev - cc_fix;
 	rcc -= rcc_prev - rcc_fix;
 
-	survey->time = CCNT_TO_MSEC(ar, cc);
-	survey->time_busy = CCNT_TO_MSEC(ar, rcc);
+	survey->filled |= filled;
+	survey->time += CCNT_TO_MSEC(ar, cc);
+	if (survey->filled & SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY)
+		survey->time_busy += CCNT_TO_MSEC(ar, rcc);
 }
 
 /* The firmware does not support setting the coverage class. Instead this
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
index 4f707c6394bb..19667e2f22fa 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/wmi.c
@@ -5662,10 +5662,38 @@  static int ath10k_wmi_event_temperature(struct ath10k *ar, struct sk_buff *skb)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void ath10k_clean_survey(struct ath10k *ar, struct survey_info *survey,
+				int idx, u64 total, u64 busy)
+{
+	u32 total_diff;
+	u32 busy_diff;
+
+	lockdep_assert_held(&ar->data_lock);
+
+	if (ar->hw_params.cc_wraparound_type != ATH10K_HW_CC_WRAP_SHIFTED_ALL)
+		return;
+
+	if (total < ar->survey_last_total_cc[idx]) {
+		total_diff = total + 0x7fffffff - ar->survey_last_total_cc[idx];
+		busy_diff = 0;
+		survey->filled &= ~SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY;
+	} else {
+		total_diff = total - ar->survey_last_total_cc[idx];
+		busy_diff = busy - ar->survey_last_busy_cc[idx];
+	}
+
+	survey->time      = CCNT_TO_MSEC(ar, total_diff);
+	survey->time_busy = CCNT_TO_MSEC(ar, busy_diff);
+
+	ar->survey_last_total_cc[idx] = total;
+	ar->survey_last_busy_cc[idx] = busy;
+}
+
 static int ath10k_wmi_event_pdev_bss_chan_info(struct ath10k *ar,
 					       struct sk_buff *skb)
 {
 	struct wmi_pdev_bss_chan_info_event *ev;
+	struct survey_info survey_tmp = {};
 	struct survey_info *survey;
 	u64 busy, total, tx, rx, rx_bss;
 	u32 freq, noise_floor;
@@ -5688,6 +5716,13 @@  static int ath10k_wmi_event_pdev_bss_chan_info(struct ath10k *ar,
 		   "wmi event pdev bss chan info:\n freq: %d noise: %d cycle: busy %llu total %llu tx %llu rx %llu rx_bss %llu\n",
 		   freq, noise_floor, busy, total, tx, rx, rx_bss);
 
+	/* everything zero means invalid data
+	 * -> drop it to avoid bogus noisefloor in survey report
+	 */
+	if (noise_floor == 0 && busy == 0 && total == 0 && tx == 0 && rx == 0 &&
+	    rx_bss == 0)
+		return -EPROTO;
+
 	spin_lock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
 	idx = freq_to_idx(ar, freq);
 	if (idx >= ARRAY_SIZE(ar->survey)) {
@@ -5696,18 +5731,29 @@  static int ath10k_wmi_event_pdev_bss_chan_info(struct ath10k *ar,
 		goto exit;
 	}
 
+	/* create delta result - might need fix of counters */
+	survey_tmp.noise     = noise_floor;
+	survey_tmp.time      = div_u64(total, cc_freq_hz);
+	survey_tmp.time_busy = div_u64(busy, cc_freq_hz);
+	survey_tmp.time_rx   = div_u64(rx_bss, cc_freq_hz);
+	survey_tmp.time_tx   = div_u64(tx, cc_freq_hz);
+	survey_tmp.filled    = (SURVEY_INFO_NOISE_DBM |
+				SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
+				SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY |
+				SURVEY_INFO_TIME_RX |
+				SURVEY_INFO_TIME_TX);
+
+	ath10k_clean_survey(ar, &survey_tmp, idx, total, busy);
+
+	/* create accumulated result */
 	survey = &ar->survey[idx];
 
-	survey->noise     = noise_floor;
-	survey->time      = div_u64(total, cc_freq_hz);
-	survey->time_busy = div_u64(busy, cc_freq_hz);
-	survey->time_rx   = div_u64(rx_bss, cc_freq_hz);
-	survey->time_tx   = div_u64(tx, cc_freq_hz);
-	survey->filled   |= (SURVEY_INFO_NOISE_DBM |
-			     SURVEY_INFO_TIME |
-			     SURVEY_INFO_TIME_BUSY |
-			     SURVEY_INFO_TIME_RX |
-			     SURVEY_INFO_TIME_TX);
+	survey->noise      = survey_tmp.noise;
+	survey->time      += survey_tmp.time;
+	survey->time_busy += survey_tmp.time_busy;
+	survey->time_rx   += survey_tmp.time_rx;
+	survey->time_tx   += survey_tmp.time_tx;
+	survey->filled    |= survey_tmp.filled;
 exit:
 	spin_unlock_bh(&ar->data_lock);
 	complete(&ar->bss_survey_done);