Message ID | 1591625864-31494-13-git-send-email-bmeng.cn@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series | hw/riscv: sifive_u: Add GPIO and Mode Select (MSEL[3:0]) support | expand |
On Mon, Jun 8, 2020 at 7:27 AM Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> > > Per the SiFive manual, all E/U series CPU cores' reset vector is > at 0x1004. Update our codes to match the hardware. > > Signed-off-by: Bin Meng <bin.meng@windriver.com> > --- > > hw/riscv/sifive_e.c | 8 +++++--- > hw/riscv/sifive_u.c | 6 +++--- > target/riscv/cpu.c | 4 ++-- > 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c > index 8fab152..f05cabd 100644 > --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c > +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c > @@ -98,9 +98,11 @@ static void sifive_e_machine_init(MachineState *machine) > memmap[SIFIVE_E_DTIM].base, main_mem); > > /* Mask ROM reset vector */ > - uint32_t reset_vec[2] = { > - 0x204002b7, /* 0x1000: lui t0,0x20400 */ > - 0x00028067, /* 0x1004: jr t0 */ > + uint32_t reset_vec[4] = { > + 0x00000000, > + 0x204002b7, /* 0x1004: lui t0,0x20400 */ > + 0x00028067, /* 0x1008: jr t0 */ > + 0x00000000, > }; > > /* copy in the reset vector in little_endian byte order */ > diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c > index aaa5adb..0a86ffc 100644 > --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c > +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c > @@ -433,18 +433,18 @@ static void sifive_u_machine_init(MachineState *machine) > > /* reset vector */ > uint32_t reset_vec[8] = { > + 0x00000000, > 0x00000297, /* 1: auipc t0, %pcrel_hi(dtb) */ > - 0x02028593, /* addi a1, t0, %pcrel_lo(1b) */ > + 0x01c28593, /* addi a1, t0, %pcrel_lo(1b) */ > 0xf1402573, /* csrr a0, mhartid */ > #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32) > 0x0182a283, /* lw t0, 24(t0) */ > #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64) > - 0x0182b283, /* ld t0, 24(t0) */ > + 0x0182e283, /* lwu t0, 24(t0) */ > #endif > 0x00028067, /* jr t0 */ > 0x00000000, > start_addr, /* start: .dword */ > - 0x00000000, > /* dtb: */ > }; > > diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c > index 5060534..1944ad6 100644 > --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c > +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c > @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void rvnn_gcsu_priv1_10_0_cpu_init(Object *obj) > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env; > set_misa(env, RVXLEN | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVS | RVU); > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0); > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC); > + set_resetvec(env, 0x1004); > } > > static void rvnn_imacu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj) > @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static void rvnn_imacu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj) > CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env; > set_misa(env, RVXLEN | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVC | RVU); > set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0); > - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC); > + set_resetvec(env, 0x1004); I know the Ibex CPU does the same thing, but I'm a little worried about this. At this rate we will have multiple generic (rvx_im*_cpu_init()) CPUs that don't have generic reset vectors. It might be best to rename the functions to match the actual CPUs in this case. Alistair > qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false); > } > > -- > 2.7.4 > >
diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c index 8fab152..f05cabd 100644 --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_e.c @@ -98,9 +98,11 @@ static void sifive_e_machine_init(MachineState *machine) memmap[SIFIVE_E_DTIM].base, main_mem); /* Mask ROM reset vector */ - uint32_t reset_vec[2] = { - 0x204002b7, /* 0x1000: lui t0,0x20400 */ - 0x00028067, /* 0x1004: jr t0 */ + uint32_t reset_vec[4] = { + 0x00000000, + 0x204002b7, /* 0x1004: lui t0,0x20400 */ + 0x00028067, /* 0x1008: jr t0 */ + 0x00000000, }; /* copy in the reset vector in little_endian byte order */ diff --git a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c index aaa5adb..0a86ffc 100644 --- a/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c +++ b/hw/riscv/sifive_u.c @@ -433,18 +433,18 @@ static void sifive_u_machine_init(MachineState *machine) /* reset vector */ uint32_t reset_vec[8] = { + 0x00000000, 0x00000297, /* 1: auipc t0, %pcrel_hi(dtb) */ - 0x02028593, /* addi a1, t0, %pcrel_lo(1b) */ + 0x01c28593, /* addi a1, t0, %pcrel_lo(1b) */ 0xf1402573, /* csrr a0, mhartid */ #if defined(TARGET_RISCV32) 0x0182a283, /* lw t0, 24(t0) */ #elif defined(TARGET_RISCV64) - 0x0182b283, /* ld t0, 24(t0) */ + 0x0182e283, /* lwu t0, 24(t0) */ #endif 0x00028067, /* jr t0 */ 0x00000000, start_addr, /* start: .dword */ - 0x00000000, /* dtb: */ }; diff --git a/target/riscv/cpu.c b/target/riscv/cpu.c index 5060534..1944ad6 100644 --- a/target/riscv/cpu.c +++ b/target/riscv/cpu.c @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ static void rvnn_gcsu_priv1_10_0_cpu_init(Object *obj) CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env; set_misa(env, RVXLEN | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVF | RVD | RVC | RVS | RVU); set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0); - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC); + set_resetvec(env, 0x1004); } static void rvnn_imacu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj) @@ -147,7 +147,7 @@ static void rvnn_imacu_nommu_cpu_init(Object *obj) CPURISCVState *env = &RISCV_CPU(obj)->env; set_misa(env, RVXLEN | RVI | RVM | RVA | RVC | RVU); set_priv_version(env, PRIV_VERSION_1_10_0); - set_resetvec(env, DEFAULT_RSTVEC); + set_resetvec(env, 0x1004); qdev_prop_set_bit(DEVICE(obj), "mmu", false); }