diff mbox

[-next] mwifiex: make function mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl static

Message ID 20170602085639.29338-1-colin.king@canonical.com (mailing list archive)
State Accepted
Commit 292c333300ec2a412902fa59aad5b365024384a5
Delegated to: Kalle Valo
Headers show

Commit Message

Colin King June 2, 2017, 8:56 a.m. UTC
From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

function mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl can be made static as it does not
need to be in global scope.

Cleans up sparse warning: "symbol 'mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl' was not
declared. Should it be static?"

Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Xinming Hu June 5, 2017, 8:23 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Colin,

> -----Original Message-----

> From: Colin King [mailto:colin.king@canonical.com]

> Sent: 2017年6月2日 16:57

> To: Amitkumar Karwar; Nishant Sarmukadam; Ganapathi Bhat; Xinming Hu;

> Kalle Valo; linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org; netdev@vger.kernel.org

> Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Subject: [EXT] [PATCH][-next] mwifiex: make function

> mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl static

> 

> External Email

> 

> ----------------------------------------------------------------------

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

> 

> function mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl can be made static as it does not need to

> be in global scope.

> 

> Cleans up sparse warning: "symbol 'mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl' was not

> declared. Should it be static?"


Yes, it should be static, Thanks,

Regards,
Simon
> 

> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

> ---

>  drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c | 4 ++--

>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c

> b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c

> index 3348fb3a7514..2945775e83c5 100644

> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c

> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c

> @@ -1154,8 +1154,8 @@ static int mwifiex_ret_chan_region_cfg(struct

> mwifiex_private *priv,

>  	return 0;

>  }

> 

> -int mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl(struct mwifiex_private *priv,

> -			      struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp)

> +static int mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl(struct mwifiex_private *priv,

> +				     struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp)

>  {

>  	struct host_cmd_ds_pkt_aggr_ctrl *pkt_aggr_ctrl =

>  					&resp->params.pkt_aggr_ctrl;

> --

> 2.11.0
Kalle Valo June 13, 2017, 7:01 a.m. UTC | #2
Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> wrote:

> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>
> 
> function mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl can be made static as it does not
> need to be in global scope.
> 
> Cleans up sparse warning: "symbol 'mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl' was not
> declared. Should it be static?"
> 
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com>

Patch applied to wireless-drivers-next.git, thanks.

292c333300ec mwifiex: make function mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl static
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
index 3348fb3a7514..2945775e83c5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/marvell/mwifiex/sta_cmdresp.c
@@ -1154,8 +1154,8 @@  static int mwifiex_ret_chan_region_cfg(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-int mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
-			      struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp)
+static int mwifiex_ret_pkt_aggr_ctrl(struct mwifiex_private *priv,
+				     struct host_cmd_ds_command *resp)
 {
 	struct host_cmd_ds_pkt_aggr_ctrl *pkt_aggr_ctrl =
 					&resp->params.pkt_aggr_ctrl;