| Message ID | 20170617195741.12757-2-paul.burton@imgtec.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
| Headers | show |
[+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ numbers 0 > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate when it > is called with hwirq=4: > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 ffffffff8092c78a > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 ffffffff80926678 > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 ffffffff80960000 > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 a8000000ffc4f8f8 > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 ffffffff80811d18 > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34 > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040c00 > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34 > ... > Call Trace: > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain with > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > --- > > Changes in v5: > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > Changes in v4: None > Changes in v3: None > Changes in v2: None > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port) > return -ENODEV; > } > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + 4, I don't understand this. Several drivers call irq_domain_add_linear() with a size of 4: dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain ks_dw_pcie_host_init advk_pcie_init_irq_domain faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: altera_pcie_init_irq_domain Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA-INTD. Are altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the 0-3 space to the 1-4 space? > &intx_domain_ops, > port); > if (!port->leg_domain) { > -- > 2.13.1 >
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > numbers 0 > > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate > > when it > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > Modules linked in: > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > ffffffff8092c78a > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000000000 > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > ffffffff80926678 > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > ffffffff80960000 > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > ffffffff80811d18 > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > 0000000000040c00 > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > ... > > Call Trace: > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > with > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > --- > > > > Changes in v5: > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > Changes in v4: None > > Changes in v3: None > > Changes in v2: None > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > return -ENODEV; > > } > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + > > 4, > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > irq_domain_add_linear() with > a size of 4: > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > INTD. Are > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the 0-3 > space > to the 1-4 space? We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/ 8/30/198 This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > > > > &intx_domain_ops, > > port); > > if (!port->leg_domain) { > > -- > > 2.13.1 > > > ________________________________ > > Confidentiality Notice. > This message may contain information that is confidential or > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any > attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and > delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
[+cc Marc] On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX > > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > > numbers 0 > > > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate > > > when it > > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > Modules linked in: > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > > 0000000000000000 > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > 0000000000000000 > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > ... > > > Call Trace: > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > > with > > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > Changes in v3: None > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > return -ENODEV; > > > } > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + > > > 4, > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > a size of 4: > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > > INTD. Are > > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the 0-3 > > space > > to the 1-4 space? > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/ > 8/30/198 Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but I couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward progress. > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot be numbered from 0." But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx that means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to know what it is. > > > &intx_domain_ops, > > > port); > > > if (!port->leg_domain) { > > > -- > > > 2.13.1 > > > > > ________________________________ > > > > Confidentiality Notice. > > This message may contain information that is confidential or > > otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended > > recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure, > > dissemination, distribution, or copying of this message, or any > > attachments, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > > message in error, please advise the sender by reply e-mail, and > > delete the message and any attachments. Thank you.
On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 20:49 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Marc] > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for > > > > INTX > > > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > > > numbers 0 > > > > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate > > > > when it > > > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > ... > > > > Call Trace: > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ > > > > domain > > > > with > > > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD > > > > case. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int > > > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > 4, > > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > 1 + > > > > 4, > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > a size of 4: > > > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > > > INTD. Are > > > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the > > > 0-3 > > > space > > > to the 1-4 space? > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2 > > 016/ > > 8/30/198 > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but > I > couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really > satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward > progress. > > > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of > > 0. > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot > be numbered from 0." > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx that > means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to > know > what it is. I'm not sure those drivers with index 0-3 range tested with 4 legacy interrupts or not. It will not has error until someone requesting 4 legacy interrupts. We see this error when we enabling multi-function endpoint (4 functions). I believe this is not altera or xilinx specific. Regards Ley Foon
On Tue, 2017-06-20 at 09:55 +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 20:49 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > [+cc Marc] > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 > > > > > for > > > > > INTX > > > > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > > > > numbers 0 > > > > > through 3). This results in a warning from > > > > > irq_domain_associate > > > > > when it > > > > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 > > > > > 0000000000000006 > > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > a8000000ffc60000 > > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff80887880 > > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 > > > > > ffffffff80887880 > > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 > > > > > 0000000000010000 > > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > ... > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] > > > > > irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ > > > > > domain > > > > > with > > > > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int > > > > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = > > > > > irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > 4, > > > > > + port->leg_domain = > > > > > irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > 1 + > > > > > 4, > > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > > a size of 4: > > > > > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have > > > > INTA- > > > > INTD. Are > > > > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the > > > > 0-3 > > > > space > > > > to the 1-4 space? > > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml > > > /2 > > > 016/ > > > 8/30/198 > > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, > > but > > I > > couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really > > satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward > > progress. > > > > > > > > > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of > > > 0. > > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these > > cannot > > be numbered from 0." > > > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx > > that > > means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to > > know > > what it is. > I'm not sure those drivers with index 0-3 range tested with 4 legacy > interrupts or not. It will not has error until someone requesting 4 > legacy interrupts. We see this error when we enabling multi-function > endpoint (4 functions). I believe this is not altera or xilinx > specific. > It is broken in dra7xx too. https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/14/241 Regards Ley Foon
Hi Bjorn, On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:49:03 PDT Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > [+cc Marc] > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX > > > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > > > numbers 0 > > > > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate > > > > when it > > > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > ... > > > > Call Trace: > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > > > with > > > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > } > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + > > > > 4, > > > > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > a size of 4: > > > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > > > INTD. Are > > > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the 0-3 > > > space > > > to the 1-4 space? > > > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/ > > 8/30/198 > > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but I > couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really > satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward > progress. > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot > be numbered from 0." > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx that > means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to know > what it is. Note that with v4 of this patchset[1] I was using hwirq numbers 0-3 with pcie- xilinx just fine, however: 1) Bharat complained. 2) It does require that the DT interrupt-map property be set accordingly, which I guess may mean we're stuck with hwirq 1-4 for drivers that already use them. Thanks, Paul [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9763191/
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: xilinx: Create legacy IRQ domain with size 5 > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 20:49 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Marc] > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for > > > > > INTX interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. > > > > > IRQ numbers 0 through 3). This results in a warning from > > > > > irq_domain_associate when it is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > ... > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > > > > with size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c index > > > > > 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int > > > > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > 4, > > > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > 1 + > > > > > 4, > > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > > a size of 4: > > > > > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > > > > INTD. Are altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset > > > > from the > > > > 0-3 > > > > space > > > > to the 1-4 space? > > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2 > > > 016/ > > > 8/30/198 > > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but I > > couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really > > satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward > > progress. > > > > > > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot > > be numbered from 0." > > > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx that > > means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to know > > what it is. > I'm not sure those drivers with index 0-3 range tested with 4 legacy interrupts or > not. It will not has error until someone requesting 4 legacy interrupts. We see > this error when we enabling multi-function endpoint (4 functions). I believe this > is not altera or xilinx specific. Hi Bjorn, Yes as mentioned by Ley Foon it's not Xilinx or Altera specific, and the issue shows up only, when we have multifunction device with 4 functions. As I already mentioned in the above pointed discussion, the issue is subsystem creates hwirq based on PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN which starts from 0x1, but in IRQ domains hwirq start from 0, due to this difference, issue arises when we use multifunction device. Bharat
Hi Bjorn, On Monday, 19 June 2017 19:07:05 PDT Paul Burton wrote: > Hi Bjorn, > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:49:03 PDT Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Marc] > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX > > > > > interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ > > > > > numbers 0 > > > > > through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate > > > > > when it > > > > > > > > > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > > > > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > > > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > > > > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > > > > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > > > > > > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > > > > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > > > > with > > > > > size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > > > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > > > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + > > > > > 4, > > > > > > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > > > > > > a size of 4: > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > > > > INTD. Are > > > > altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset from the 0-3 > > > > space > > > > to the 1-4 space? > > > > > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/ > > > 8/30/198 > > > > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but I > > couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really > > satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward > > progress. > > > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > > > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot > > be numbered from 0." > > > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx that > > means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to know > > what it is. > > Note that with v4 of this patchset[1] I was using hwirq numbers 0-3 with > pcie- xilinx just fine, however: > > 1) Bharat complained. > > 2) It does require that the DT interrupt-map property be set accordingly, > which I guess may mean we're stuck with hwirq 1-4 for drivers that already > use them. > > Thanks, > Paul > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9763191/ I see this series wasn't included in your pull request for v4.13 - is there anything you're waiting on? I've produced revisions of the series that work both ways now (0<=hwirq<=3 in v4, 1<=hwirq<=4 in v5) so I'm not sure what more I can do. Thanks, Paul
> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pci- > owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Paul Burton > Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 4:30 AM > To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org> > Cc: Ley Foon Tan <ley.foon.tan@intel.com>; linux-pci@vger.kernel.org; Bharat > Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com>; Ravikiran Gummaluri > <rgummal@xilinx.com>; Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>; Michal Simek > <michal.simek@xilinx.com>; linux-mips@linux-mips.org; Thomas Gleixner > <tglx@linutronix.de>; Ley Foon Tan <lftan@altera.com>; Marc Zyngier > <marc.zyngier@arm.com> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: xilinx: Create legacy IRQ domain with size 5 > > Hi Bjorn, > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 19:07:05 PDT Paul Burton wrote: > > Hi Bjorn, > > > > On Monday, 19 June 2017 18:49:03 PDT Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > [+cc Marc] > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for > > > > > > INTX interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. > > > > > > IRQ numbers 0 through 3). This results in a warning from > > > > > > irq_domain_associate when it > > > > > > > > > > > > is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > > > > > > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > > > > > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > > > > > > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > > > > > > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 > > > > > > 0000000000000006 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > > a8000000ffc60000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > > > ffffffff80887880 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 > > > > > > ffffffff80887880 > > > > > > > > > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > > > > > > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 > > > > > > 0000000000010000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > > > > > > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > > > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ > > > > > > domain with size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the > > > > > > hwirq=4/INTD case. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c index > > > > > > 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int > > > > > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > > > > > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, > > > > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > > + 1 + > > > > > > 4, > > > > > > > > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > > > > > > > > a size of 4: > > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have > > > > > INTA- INTD. Are altera and xilinx missing something to apply an > > > > > offset from the 0-3 space to the 1-4 space? > > > > > > > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: > > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/ > > > > 8/30/198 > > > > > > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but > > > I couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was > > > really satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make > > > forward progress. > > > > > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > > > > > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > > > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > > > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these > > > cannot be numbered from 0." > > > > > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > > > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx > > > that means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like > > > to know what it is. > > > > Note that with v4 of this patchset[1] I was using hwirq numbers 0-3 > > with > > pcie- xilinx just fine, however: > > > > 1) Bharat complained. > > > > 2) It does require that the DT interrupt-map property be set > > accordingly, which I guess may mean we're stuck with hwirq 1-4 for > > drivers that already use them. > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > > > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9763191/ > > I see this series wasn't included in your pull request for v4.13 - is there anything > you're waiting on? > > I've produced revisions of the series that work both ways now (0<=hwirq<=3 in > v4, 1<=hwirq<=4 in v5) so I'm not sure what more I can do. > Hi Bjorn, I will test and give ack on paul's final series of patches. I'm waiting for you to respond on this particular patch. Regards, Bharat
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:30:39AM +0000, Bharat Kumar Gogada wrote: > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/4] PCI: xilinx: Create legacy IRQ domain with size 5 > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 20:49 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > [+cc Marc] > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 08:38:14AM +0800, Ley Foon Tan wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2017-06-19 at 18:47 -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > > > [+cc Thomas, Ley Foon] > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 17, 2017 at 12:57:38PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for > > > > > > INTX interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. > > > > > > IRQ numbers 0 through 3). This results in a warning from > > > > > > irq_domain_associate when it is called with hwirq=4: > > > > > > > > > > > > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 > > > > > > irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > > error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy > > > > > > Modules linked in: > > > > > > CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W > > > > > > 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 > > > > > > Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 > > > > > > ffffffff8092c78a > > > > > > 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 > > > > > > ffffffff80926678 > > > > > > 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 > > > > > > ffffffff80960000 > > > > > > ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 > > > > > > a8000000ffc4f8f8 > > > > > > 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 > > > > > > ffffffff80811d18 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 > > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 > > > > > > 0000000000040c00 > > > > > > 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 > > > > > > ffffffff8042cf34 > > > > > > ... > > > > > > Call Trace: > > > > > > [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 > > > > > > [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 > > > > > > [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 > > > > > > [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 > > > > > > [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 > > > > > > [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 > > > > > > [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c > > > > > > > > > > > > This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain > > > > > > with size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD > > > > > > case. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> > > > > > > Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> > > > > > > Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> > > > > > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > > > > > Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> > > > > > > Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org > > > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v5: > > > > > > - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". > > > > > > > > > > > > Changes in v4: None > > > > > > Changes in v3: None > > > > > > Changes in v2: None > > > > > > > > > > > > drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- > > > > > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > > b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c index > > > > > > 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 > > > > > > --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c > > > > > > @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int > > > > > > xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct > > > > > > xilinx_pcie_port *port) > > > > > > return -ENODEV; > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > > - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > > 4, > > > > > > + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, > > > > > > 1 + > > > > > > 4, > > > > > I don't understand this. Several drivers call > > > > > irq_domain_add_linear() with > > > > > a size of 4: > > > > > > > > > > dra7xx_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > ks_dw_pcie_host_init > > > > > advk_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > faraday_pci_setup_cascaded_irq > > > > > rockchip_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > nwl_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > > > Only one other in drivers/pci uses a size of 5: > > > > > > > > > > altera_pcie_init_irq_domain > > > > > > > > > > Why can't we use a size of 4 for all of them? We only have INTA- > > > > > INTD. Are altera and xilinx missing something to apply an offset > > > > > from the > > > > > 0-3 > > > > > space > > > > > to the 1-4 space? > > > > We have the same discussion before in 2016: https://lkml.org/lkml/2 > > > > 016/ > > > > 8/30/198 > > > Thanks for digging that out. I knew we'd discussed this before, but I > > > couldn't find it in the archives. I don't think anybody was really > > > satisfied with the outcome, but we accepted it to make forward > > > progress. > > > > > > > > > > > This is because legacy interrupt is start with index 1 instead of 0. > > > I'm not buying this. Your argument was that "the hwirq for legacy > > > interrupts will start at 0x1 to 0x4 (INTA to INTD) and these values > > > are as per PCIe specification for legacy interrupts. So these cannot > > > be numbered from 0." > > > > > > But all the other drivers I mentioned get along with the 0-3 range > > > somehow. If there's something different about altera and xilinx that > > > means they can't use the same solution the others do, I'd like to know > > > what it is. > > I'm not sure those drivers with index 0-3 range tested with 4 legacy interrupts or > > not. It will not has error until someone requesting 4 legacy interrupts. We see > > this error when we enabling multi-function endpoint (4 functions). I believe this > > is not altera or xilinx specific. > > Hi Bjorn, > > Yes as mentioned by Ley Foon it's not Xilinx or Altera specific, and the issue shows > up only, when we have multifunction device with 4 functions. > As I already mentioned in the above pointed discussion, the issue is subsystem > creates hwirq based on PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN which starts from 0x1, but in > IRQ domains hwirq start from 0, due to this difference, issue arises > when we use multifunction device. There are 4 PCI INTx interrupts. That says to me that ideally the irq_domain would be of size 4. I think I see the core code you're referring to: of_irq_parse_and_map_pci of_irq_parse_pci(&irq_data) pci_read_config_byte(pdev, PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, &pin) irq_data->args[0] = pin # 1 == INTA irq_create_of_mapping(&irq_data) of_phandle_args_to_fwspec(irq_data, &fwspec) fwspec->param[0] = irq_data->args[0] irq_create_fwspec_mapping(&fwspec) irq_domain_translate(domain, fwspec, &hwirq, ...) if (d->ops->xlate) return d->ops->xlate(..., fwspec->param, hwirq, ...) *hwirq = fwspec->param[0] # default The default in irq_domain_translate() is to use fwspec->param[0], i.e., the value from PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN, as the hwirq value. The fact that of_irq_parse_pci() sets irq_data->args[0] to the 1-4 range instead of a 0-3 range seems bogus to me. At that point, we know there are only 4 valid values, and it seems pointless to waste the 0 value. Changing this would affect a fair amount of code (about 25 callers of of_irq_parse_and_map_pci()), but it doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility to fix them all. Alternatively, there *is* provision for a translation function in irq_domain_translate(). Maybe that could be used to translate the 1-4 range from PCI_INTERRUPT_PIN to a 0-3 range? That's also a change to every affected driver, so it would be ugly and might be almost as intrusive as fixing of_irq_parse_pci(). Bjorn
diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c index 2fe2df51f9f8..94c71fb91648 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c @@ -524,7 +524,7 @@ static int xilinx_pcie_init_irq_domain(struct xilinx_pcie_port *port) return -ENODEV; } - port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 4, + port->leg_domain = irq_domain_add_linear(pcie_intc_node, 1 + 4, &intx_domain_ops, port); if (!port->leg_domain) {
The driver expects to use hardware IRQ numbers 1 through 4 for INTX interrupts, but only creates an IRQ domain of size 4 (ie. IRQ numbers 0 through 3). This results in a warning from irq_domain_associate when it is called with hwirq=4: WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at kernel/irq/irqdomain.c:365 irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 error: hwirq 0x4 is too large for dummy Modules linked in: CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G W 4.12.0-rc5-00126-g19e1b3a10aad-dirty #427 Stack : 0000000000000000 0000000000000004 0000000000000006 ffffffff8092c78a 0000000000000061 ffffffff8018bf60 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff8088c287 ffffffff80811d18 a8000000ffc60000 ffffffff80926678 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 ffffffff80887880 ffffffff80960000 ffffffff80920000 ffffffff801e6744 ffffffff80887880 a8000000ffc4f8f8 000000000000089c ffffffff8018d260 0000000000010000 ffffffff80811d18 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 a8000000ffc4f840 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000040c00 0000000000000000 ffffffff8010d1c8 0000000000000000 ffffffff8042cf34 ... Call Trace: [<ffffffff8010d1c8>] show_stack+0x80/0xa0 [<ffffffff8042cf34>] dump_stack+0xd4/0x110 [<ffffffff8013ea98>] __warn+0xf0/0x108 [<ffffffff8013eb14>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x3c/0x48 [<ffffffff80196528>] irq_domain_associate+0x170/0x220 [<ffffffff80196bf0>] irq_create_mapping+0x88/0x118 [<ffffffff801976a8>] irq_create_fwspec_mapping+0xb8/0x320 [<ffffffff80197970>] irq_create_of_mapping+0x60/0x70 [<ffffffff805d1318>] of_irq_parse_and_map_pci+0x20/0x38 [<ffffffff8049c210>] pci_fixup_irqs+0x60/0xe0 [<ffffffff8049cd64>] xilinx_pcie_probe+0x28c/0x478 [<ffffffff804e8ca8>] platform_drv_probe+0x50/0xd0 [<ffffffff804e73a4>] driver_probe_device+0x2c4/0x3a0 [<ffffffff804e7544>] __driver_attach+0xc4/0xd0 [<ffffffff804e5254>] bus_for_each_dev+0x64/0xa8 [<ffffffff804e5e40>] bus_add_driver+0x1f0/0x268 [<ffffffff804e8000>] driver_register+0x68/0x118 [<ffffffff801001a4>] do_one_initcall+0x4c/0x178 [<ffffffff808d3ca8>] kernel_init_freeable+0x204/0x2b0 [<ffffffff80730b68>] kernel_init+0x10/0xf8 [<ffffffff80106218>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c This patch avoids that warning by creating the legacy IRQ domain with size 5 rather than 4, allowing it to cover the hwirq=4/INTD case. Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@imgtec.com> Cc: Bharat Kumar Gogada <bharatku@xilinx.com> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> Cc: Ravikiran Gummaluri <rgummal@xilinx.com> Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org --- Changes in v5: - New patch; replacing "PCI: xilinx: Fix INTX irq dispatch". Changes in v4: None Changes in v3: None Changes in v2: None drivers/pci/host/pcie-xilinx.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)