@@ -3964,7 +3964,7 @@ __i915_request_irq_complete(struct drm_i915_gem_request *req)
*/
if (engine->irq_seqno_barrier &&
rcu_access_pointer(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_seqno_bh) == current &&
- cmpxchg_relaxed(&engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted, 1, 0)) {
+ test_and_clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted)) {
struct task_struct *tsk;
/* The ordering of irq_posted versus applying the barrier
@@ -1033,7 +1033,7 @@ static void ironlake_rps_change_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
static void notify_ring(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
{
- smp_store_mb(engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted, true);
+ set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
if (intel_engine_wakeup(engine))
trace_i915_gem_request_notify(engine);
}
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ static void irq_enable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
* we still need to force the barrier before reading the seqno,
* just in case.
*/
- engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted = true;
+ __set_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
/* Caller disables interrupts */
spin_lock(&engine->i915->irq_lock);
@@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ static void irq_disable(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
engine->irq_disable(engine);
spin_unlock(&engine->i915->irq_lock);
- engine->breadcrumbs.irq_posted = false;
+ __clear_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted);
}
static void __intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(struct intel_breadcrumbs *b)
@@ -257,7 +257,8 @@ static bool __intel_engine_add_wait(struct intel_engine_cs *engine,
* in case the seqno passed.
*/
__intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(b);
- if (READ_ONCE(b->irq_posted))
+ if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB,
+ &engine->irq_posted))
wake_up_process(to_wait(next)->tsk);
}
@@ -610,7 +611,7 @@ void intel_engine_reset_breadcrumbs(struct intel_engine_cs *engine)
if (intel_engine_has_waiter(engine)) {
b->timeout = wait_timeout();
__intel_breadcrumbs_enable_irq(b);
- if (READ_ONCE(b->irq_posted))
+ if (test_bit(ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB, &engine->irq_posted))
wake_up_process(b->first_wait->tsk);
} else {
/* sanitize the IMR and unmask any auxiliary interrupts */
@@ -211,6 +211,9 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
struct intel_render_state *render_state;
+ unsigned long irq_posted;
+#define ENGINE_IRQ_BREADCRUMB 0
+
/* Rather than have every client wait upon all user interrupts,
* with the herd waking after every interrupt and each doing the
* heavyweight seqno dance, we delegate the task (of being the
@@ -229,7 +232,6 @@ struct intel_engine_cs {
*/
struct intel_breadcrumbs {
struct task_struct __rcu *irq_seqno_bh; /* bh for interrupts */
- bool irq_posted;
spinlock_t lock; /* protects the lists of requests; irqsafe */
struct rb_root waiters; /* sorted by retirement, priority */
In the next patch, we will use the irq_posted technique for another engine interrupt, rather than use two members for the atomic updates, we can use two bits of one instead. First, we need to update the breadcrumbs to use the new common engine->irq_posted. Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.h | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_breadcrumbs.c | 9 +++++---- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_ringbuffer.h | 4 +++- 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)