diff mbox series

[3/3] drm/i915: Refactor .hpd_irq_setup() calls a bit

Message ID 20201006185809.4655-3-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [1/3] drm/i915: Reorder hpd init vs. display resume | expand

Commit Message

Ville Syrjälä Oct. 6, 2020, 6:58 p.m. UTC
From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Add a small wrapper for .hpd_irq_setup() which does the
"do we even have the hook?" and "are display interrupts enabled?"
checks.

Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 22 +++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Imre Deak Oct. 12, 2020, 8:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:58:09PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
> 
> Add a small wrapper for .hpd_irq_setup() which does the
> "do we even have the hook?" and "are display interrupts enabled?"
> checks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>

Reviewed-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c | 22 +++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> index 5c58c1ed6493..6110d71b4f14 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
> @@ -213,6 +213,12 @@ intel_hpd_irq_storm_switch_to_polling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static void intel_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
> +{
> +	if (i915->display_irqs_enabled && i915->display.hpd_irq_setup)
> +		i915->display.hpd_irq_setup(i915);
> +}
> +
>  static void intel_hpd_irq_storm_reenable_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
> @@ -248,8 +254,7 @@ static void intel_hpd_irq_storm_reenable_work(struct work_struct *work)
>  			dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].state = HPD_ENABLED;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled && dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup)
> -		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> +	intel_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
>  
>  	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>  
> @@ -556,8 +561,8 @@ void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
>  	 * Disable any IRQs that storms were detected on. Polling enablement
>  	 * happens later in our hotplug work.
>  	 */
> -	if (storm_detected && dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled)
> -		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> +	if (storm_detected)
> +		intel_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
>  	spin_unlock(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>  
>  	/*
> @@ -602,12 +607,9 @@ void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
>  	 * Interrupt setup is already guaranteed to be single-threaded, this is
>  	 * just to make the assert_spin_locked checks happy.
>  	 */
> -	if (dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled && dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup) {
> -		spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> -		if (dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled)
> -			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> -		spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> -	}
> +	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
> +	intel_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
> +	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
>  }
>  
>  static void i915_hpd_poll_init_work(struct work_struct *work)
> -- 
> 2.26.2
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Intel-gfx mailing list
> Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
index 5c58c1ed6493..6110d71b4f14 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/display/intel_hotplug.c
@@ -213,6 +213,12 @@  intel_hpd_irq_storm_switch_to_polling(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	}
 }
 
+static void intel_hpd_irq_setup(struct drm_i915_private *i915)
+{
+	if (i915->display_irqs_enabled && i915->display.hpd_irq_setup)
+		i915->display.hpd_irq_setup(i915);
+}
+
 static void intel_hpd_irq_storm_reenable_work(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv =
@@ -248,8 +254,7 @@  static void intel_hpd_irq_storm_reenable_work(struct work_struct *work)
 			dev_priv->hotplug.stats[pin].state = HPD_ENABLED;
 	}
 
-	if (dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled && dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup)
-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
+	intel_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
 
 	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 
@@ -556,8 +561,8 @@  void intel_hpd_irq_handler(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
 	 * Disable any IRQs that storms were detected on. Polling enablement
 	 * happens later in our hotplug work.
 	 */
-	if (storm_detected && dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled)
-		dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
+	if (storm_detected)
+		intel_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
 	spin_unlock(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 
 	/*
@@ -602,12 +607,9 @@  void intel_hpd_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv)
 	 * Interrupt setup is already guaranteed to be single-threaded, this is
 	 * just to make the assert_spin_locked checks happy.
 	 */
-	if (dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled && dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
-		if (dev_priv->display_irqs_enabled)
-			dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
-		spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
-	}
+	spin_lock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
+	intel_hpd_irq_setup(dev_priv);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&dev_priv->irq_lock);
 }
 
 static void i915_hpd_poll_init_work(struct work_struct *work)