diff mbox series

ALSA: hda/i915 - avoid hung task timeout in i915 wait

Message ID 20220308141112.880662-1-kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series ALSA: hda/i915 - avoid hung task timeout in i915 wait | expand

Commit Message

Kai Vehmanen March 8, 2022, 2:11 p.m. UTC
If kernel is built with hung task detection enabled and
CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT set to less than 60 seconds,
snd_hdac_i915_init() will trigger the hung task timeout in case i915 is
not available and taint the kernel.

Split the 60sec wait into a loop of smaller waits to avoid this.

Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
Co-developed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
---
 sound/hda/hdac_i915.c | 10 ++++++----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)


base-commit: fd7698cf0858f8c5e659b655109cd93c2f15cdd3

Comments

Lucas De Marchi March 8, 2022, 4:05 p.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 04:11:12PM +0200, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>If kernel is built with hung task detection enabled and
>CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT set to less than 60 seconds,
>snd_hdac_i915_init() will trigger the hung task timeout in case i915 is
>not available and taint the kernel.
>
>Split the 60sec wait into a loop of smaller waits to avoid this.
>
>Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
>Co-developed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
>Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>


Reviewed-by: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>

thanks
Lucas De Marchi
Amadeusz Sławiński March 8, 2022, 4:29 p.m. UTC | #2
On 3/8/2022 3:11 PM, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> If kernel is built with hung task detection enabled and
> CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT set to less than 60 seconds,
> snd_hdac_i915_init() will trigger the hung task timeout in case i915 is
> not available and taint the kernel.
> 
> Split the 60sec wait into a loop of smaller waits to avoid this.
> 
> Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> Co-developed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>   sound/hda/hdac_i915.c | 10 ++++++----
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> index 454474ac5716..6219de739b56 100644
> --- a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> +++ b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> @@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ static bool i915_gfx_present(void)
>   int snd_hdac_i915_init(struct hdac_bus *bus)
>   {
>   	struct drm_audio_component *acomp;
> -	int err;
> +	unsigned long wait = 0;

I'm not sure if it is best name for variable that is set to 0 ("false"), 
maybe `done` would be better? Especially looking at condition in the 
following for loop.

> +	int err, i;
>   
>   	if (!i915_gfx_present())
>   		return -ENODEV;
> @@ -159,9 +160,10 @@ int snd_hdac_i915_init(struct hdac_bus *bus)
>   	if (!acomp->ops) {
>   		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) ||
>   		    !request_module("i915")) {
> -			/* 60s timeout */
> -			wait_for_completion_timeout(&acomp->master_bind_complete,
> -						    msecs_to_jiffies(60 * 1000));
> +			/* max 60s timeout */
> +			for (i = 0; !wait && i < 60; i++)
> +				wait = wait_for_completion_timeout(&acomp->master_bind_complete,
> +								   msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
>   		}
>   	}
>   	if (!acomp->ops) {
> 
> base-commit: fd7698cf0858f8c5e659b655109cd93c2f15cdd3
Takashi Iwai March 8, 2022, 4:37 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, 08 Mar 2022 17:29:21 +0100,
Amadeusz SX2awiX4ski wrote:
> 
> On 3/8/2022 3:11 PM, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> > If kernel is built with hung task detection enabled and
> > CONFIG_DEFAULT_HUNG_TASK_TIMEOUT set to less than 60 seconds,
> > snd_hdac_i915_init() will trigger the hung task timeout in case i915 is
> > not available and taint the kernel.
> >
> > Split the 60sec wait into a loop of smaller waits to avoid this.
> >
> > Cc: Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Ramalingam C <ramalingam.c@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >   sound/hda/hdac_i915.c | 10 ++++++----
> >   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> > index 454474ac5716..6219de739b56 100644
> > --- a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> > +++ b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
> > @@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ static bool i915_gfx_present(void)
> >   int snd_hdac_i915_init(struct hdac_bus *bus)
> >   {
> >   	struct drm_audio_component *acomp;
> > -	int err;
> > +	unsigned long wait = 0;
> 
> I'm not sure if it is best name for variable that is set to 0
> ("false"), maybe `done` would be better? Especially looking at
> condition in the following for loop.

Or, more simply some thing like

			/* max 60s timeout */
			for (i = 0; i < 60; i++) {
				if (wait_for_completion_timeout(&acomp->master_bind_complete,
								   msecs_to_jiffies(1000)))
					break;
			}


Takashi
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
index 454474ac5716..6219de739b56 100644
--- a/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
+++ b/sound/hda/hdac_i915.c
@@ -143,7 +143,8 @@  static bool i915_gfx_present(void)
 int snd_hdac_i915_init(struct hdac_bus *bus)
 {
 	struct drm_audio_component *acomp;
-	int err;
+	unsigned long wait = 0;
+	int err, i;
 
 	if (!i915_gfx_present())
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -159,9 +160,10 @@  int snd_hdac_i915_init(struct hdac_bus *bus)
 	if (!acomp->ops) {
 		if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_MODULES) ||
 		    !request_module("i915")) {
-			/* 60s timeout */
-			wait_for_completion_timeout(&acomp->master_bind_complete,
-						    msecs_to_jiffies(60 * 1000));
+			/* max 60s timeout */
+			for (i = 0; !wait && i < 60; i++)
+				wait = wait_for_completion_timeout(&acomp->master_bind_complete,
+								   msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
 		}
 	}
 	if (!acomp->ops) {