diff mbox series

[v3,17/23] KVM: x86/mmu: Extend make_huge_page_split_spte() for the shadow MMU

Message ID 20220401175554.1931568-18-dmatlack@google.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series KVM: Extend Eager Page Splitting to the shadow MMU | expand

Commit Message

David Matlack April 1, 2022, 5:55 p.m. UTC
Currently make_huge_page_split_spte() assumes execute permissions can be
granted to any 4K SPTE when splitting huge pages. This is true for the
TDP MMU but is not necessarily true for the shadow MMU, since we may be
splitting a huge page that shadows a non-executable guest huge page.

To fix this, pass in the child shadow page where the huge page will be
split and derive the execution permission from the shadow page's role.
This is correct because huge pages are always split with direct shadow
page and thus the shadow page role contains the correct access
permissions.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c    | 13 +++++++------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h    |  2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index d10189d9c877..ef6537c6f5ef 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -216,10 +216,11 @@  static u64 make_spte_executable(u64 spte)
  * This is used during huge page splitting to build the SPTEs that make up the
  * new page table.
  */
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index)
+u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index)
 {
+	bool exec_allowed = sp->role.access & ACC_EXEC_MASK;
+	int child_level = sp->role.level;
 	u64 child_spte;
-	int child_level;
 
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!is_shadow_present_pte(huge_spte)))
 		return 0;
@@ -228,7 +229,6 @@  u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index)
 		return 0;
 
 	child_spte = huge_spte;
-	child_level = huge_level - 1;
 
 	/*
 	 * The child_spte already has the base address of the huge page being
@@ -241,10 +241,11 @@  u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index)
 		child_spte &= ~PT_PAGE_SIZE_MASK;
 
 		/*
-		 * When splitting to a 4K page, mark the page executable as the
-		 * NX hugepage mitigation no longer applies.
+		 * When splitting to a 4K page where execution is allowed, mark
+		 * the page executable as the NX hugepage mitigation no longer
+		 * applies.
 		 */
-		if (is_nx_huge_page_enabled())
+		if (exec_allowed && is_nx_huge_page_enabled())
 			child_spte = make_spte_executable(child_spte);
 	}
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index 73f12615416f..921ea77f1b5e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -415,7 +415,7 @@  bool make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 	       unsigned int pte_access, gfn_t gfn, kvm_pfn_t pfn,
 	       u64 old_spte, bool prefetch, bool can_unsync,
 	       bool host_writable, u64 *new_spte);
-u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, int huge_level, int index);
+u64 make_huge_page_split_spte(u64 huge_spte, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, int index);
 u64 make_nonleaf_spte(u64 *child_pt, bool ad_disabled);
 u64 make_mmio_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gfn, unsigned int access);
 u64 mark_spte_for_access_track(u64 spte);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index a04262bc34e2..36d241405ecc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1455,7 +1455,7 @@  static int tdp_mmu_split_huge_page(struct kvm *kvm, struct tdp_iter *iter,
 	 * not been linked in yet and thus is not reachable from any other CPU.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < PT64_ENT_PER_PAGE; i++)
-		sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, level, i);
+		sp->spt[i] = make_huge_page_split_spte(huge_spte, sp, i);
 
 	/*
 	 * Replace the huge spte with a pointer to the populated lower level