@@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
irqs = min(pmu_device->num_resources, num_possible_cpus());
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
on_each_cpu_mask(&cpu_pmu->supported_cpus,
cpu_pmu_disable_percpu_irq, &irq, 1);
free_percpu_irq(irq, &hw_events->percpu_pmu);
@@ -616,7 +616,7 @@ static void cpu_pmu_free_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu)
if (!cpumask_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu, &cpu_pmu->active_irqs))
continue;
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, i);
- if (irq >= 0)
+ if (irq > 0)
free_irq(irq, per_cpu_ptr(&hw_events->percpu_pmu, cpu));
}
}
@@ -638,7 +638,7 @@ static int cpu_pmu_request_irq(struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu, irq_handler_t handler)
}
irq = platform_get_irq(pmu_device, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
err = request_percpu_irq(irq, handler, "arm-pmu",
&hw_events->percpu_pmu);
if (err) {
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
/* Check the IRQ type and prohibit a mix of PPIs and SPIs */
irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, i);
- if (irq >= 0) {
+ if (irq > 0) {
bool spi = !irq_is_percpu(irq);
if (i > 0 && spi != using_spi) {
@@ -970,7 +970,7 @@ static int of_pmu_irq_cfg(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
if (cpumask_weight(&pmu->supported_cpus) == 0) {
int irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
- if (irq >= 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
+ if (irq > 0 && irq_is_percpu(irq)) {
/* If using PPIs, check the affinity of the partition */
int ret;
As declared by the chief penguin, and enforced by the NO_IRQ brigade, IRQ0 doesn't exist, and is considered as an error (no irq). Unfortunately, the arm_pmu driver still considers it as valid in a large number of cases. Let's fix this. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> --- drivers/perf/arm_pmu.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)