diff mbox series

[v1,23/50] ARM: dts: exynos: change lowest OPP in bus_disp1_fimd in Exynos5420

Message ID 20190715124417.4787-24-l.luba@partner.samsung.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series [v1,01/50] clk: samsung: add new IDs for Exynos5420 clocks | expand

Commit Message

Lukasz Luba July 15, 2019, 12:43 p.m. UTC
The lowest OPP must be aligned to possible value after division of parent
clock rate. Thus, change it to the value which is true for clock 1200MHz.

Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com>
---
 arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski July 17, 2019, 9:08 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, 15 Jul 2019 at 14:44, Lukasz Luba <l.luba@partner.samsung.com> wrote:
>
> The lowest OPP must be aligned to possible value after division of parent
> clock rate. Thus, change it to the value which is true for clock 1200MHz.

I think this is getting slightly too granular. It seems you are
solving the same problem (or very small subset of the same problem) as
in patch 22:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11043849/

Please combine such changes per IP block, unless you have really
reproducible different issues (e.g. reproducible different performance
problem or OOPS, but not just what clk_summary prints). I imagine that
you align entire subsystem (DISP) buses to real clock frequencies (or
to match real frequencies, or to achieve more granular scaling, or to
get slightly better performance).

Best regards,
Krzysztof
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
index 6e82ffcbeacd..0739e7bd4628 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos5420.dtsi
@@ -1294,7 +1294,7 @@ 
 			compatible = "operating-points-v2";
 
 			opp00 {
-				opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <120000000>;
+				opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <150000000>;
 			};
 			opp01 {
 				opp-hz = /bits/ 64 <200000000>;