| Message ID | 20201221113151.94515-3-jagan@amarulasolutions.com (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| State | New, archived |
| Headers | show |
| Series | arm64: dts: imx8mm: Add Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini | expand |
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > touch interface support. > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > Add bindings for it. > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > --- > Changes for v2: > - updated commit message > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > items: > - enum: > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't match. Submitting bindings and DTS which fail on day 0 is the same as sending code which does not compile. Best regards, Krzysztof > - fsl,imx8mm-ddr4-evk # i.MX8MM DDR4 EVK Board > - fsl,imx8mm-evk # i.MX8MM EVK Board > - kontron,imx8mm-n801x-som # i.MX8MM Kontron SL (N801X) SOM > -- > 2.25.1 >
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > touch interface support. > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > --- > > Changes for v2: > > - updated commit message > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > items: > > - enum: > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > match. Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. This the dts file ie used matched compatible. compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", "fsl,imx8mm"; I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check ... From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb .. Can you let me know what I missed here? Jagan.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > --- > > > Changes for v2: > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > items: > > > - enum: > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > match. > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > ... > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > .. > > Can you let me know what I missed here? You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 at patch #5. No changes here stil. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > --- > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > > items: > > > > - enum: > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > > match. > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > > ... > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > > .. > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here? > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 > at patch #5. No changes here stil. Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build. # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch] HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml # Jagan.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > > > items: > > > > > - enum: > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > > > match. > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > > > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > > > ... > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > > > .. > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here? > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 > > at patch #5. No changes here stil. > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build. > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml 1. Wrong path to schema file, 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, right? Best regards, Krzysztof
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > > > --- > > > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > > > > items: > > > > > > - enum: > > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > > > > match. > > > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > > > > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > > > > ... > > > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > > > > .. > > > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here? > > > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or > > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit > > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 > > > at patch #5. No changes here stil. > > > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build > > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build. > > > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml > > 1. Wrong path to schema file, > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, > right? But kbuild is building the fsl.yaml I did verify with by adding some wrong character in the file, it is showing build issues. Please check the clean log. # make mrproper CLEAN Documentation/devicetree/bindings CLEAN scripts/basic CLEAN scripts/dtc # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch] HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: 'additionalProperties' is a required property SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: warning: no schema found in file: ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dts DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml Jagan.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:17 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > > > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > > > > > items: > > > > > > > - enum: > > > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > > > > > match. > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > > > > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > > > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > > > > > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > > > > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > > > > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here? > > > > > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or > > > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit > > > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > > > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 > > > > at patch #5. No changes here stil. > > > > > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build > > > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build. > > > > > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml > > > > 1. Wrong path to schema file, > > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, > > right? > > But kbuild is building the fsl.yaml I did verify with by adding some > wrong character in the file, it is showing build issues. > > Please check the clean log. > > # make mrproper > CLEAN Documentation/devicetree/bindings > CLEAN scripts/basic > CLEAN scripts/dtc > # make dt_binding_check > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o > LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch] > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o > HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: > ignoring, error in schema: > warning: no schema found in file: > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: > ignoring, error in schema: > warning: no schema found in file: > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring, > error in schema: > warning: no schema found in file: > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: > ignoring, error in schema: > warning: no schema found in file: > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dts > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml Any further comments? I'm planning to send v3. Jagan.
On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:28, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:17 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > > > > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > > > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > > > > > > items: > > > > > > > > - enum: > > > > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > > > > > > match. > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > > > > > > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > > > > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > > > > > > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > > > > > > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > > > > > > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here? > > > > > > > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or > > > > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit > > > > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > > > > > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 > > > > > at patch #5. No changes here stil. > > > > > > > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build > > > > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build. > > > > > > > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > 1. Wrong path to schema file, > > > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, > > > right? > > > > But kbuild is building the fsl.yaml I did verify with by adding some > > wrong character in the file, it is showing build issues. > > > > Please check the clean log. > > > > # make mrproper > > CLEAN Documentation/devicetree/bindings > > CLEAN scripts/basic > > CLEAN scripts/dtc > > # make dt_binding_check > > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o > > LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c > > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch] > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o > > HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: > > ignoring, error in schema: > > warning: no schema found in file: > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: > > ignoring, error in schema: > > warning: no schema found in file: > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring, > > error in schema: > > warning: no schema found in file: > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: > > ignoring, error in schema: > > warning: no schema found in file: > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml > > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dts > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml > > Any further comments? I'm planning to send v3. What comments do you need? Your schema and DTS are wrong. If you run dtbs_check, which I mentioned in the first email, you would see the result. Instead you pasted unrelevant check of other bindings and later pasted dt_binding_check. It does not make sense, so I clarified: > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, right? And you pasted dt_binding_check, so it kind of closes the discussion. I don't know what to add more. I reported this problem already in v1, so please don't send the same wrong code for the third time. Best regards, Krzysztof
On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 09:25:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, 22 Dec 2020 at 19:28, Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:17 PM Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 8:12 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 08:09:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:35 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 07:29:22PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 7:16 PM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 05:01:47PM +0530, Jagan Teki wrote: > > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive > > > > > > > > > touch interface support. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for > > > > > > > > > creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Add bindings for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > > > > > Changes for v2: > > > > > > > > > - updated commit message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ > > > > > > > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > > index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 > > > > > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > > @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: > > > > > > > > > items: > > > > > > > > > - enum: > > > > > > > > > - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit > > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM > > > > > > > > > + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please test your DTS against new schema with dtbs_check. This won't > > > > > > > > match. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry, not sure I understand clearly here. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This the dts file ie used matched compatible. > > > > > > > compatible = "engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2", "engicam,icore-mx8mm", > > > > > > > "fsl,imx8mm"; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I did build the dtbs_check without showing any issues like, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > $ make ARCH=arm64 dtbs_check > > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From schema: /w/dt-schema/dt-schema/dtschema/schemas/property-units.yaml > > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb > > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2-of10.dtb > > > > > > > DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-edimm2.2.dtb > > > > > > > .. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Can you let me know what I missed here? > > > > > > > > > > > > You pasted here output of validating with property-units.yaml (or > > > > > > something else), not the schema which you changed. If you want to limit > > > > > > the tests, use DT_SCHEMA_FILES. > > > > > > > > > > > > I mentioned about exactly the same problem in yout previous v1 > > > > > > at patch #5. No changes here stil. > > > > > > > > > > Yes, I usually did that check before posting. Please check the build > > > > > log below and fsl.yaml binding is fine to build. > > > > > > > > > > # make dt_binding_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=arm/fsl.yaml > > > > > > > > 1. Wrong path to schema file, > > > > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, > > > > right? > > > > > > But kbuild is building the fsl.yaml I did verify with by adding some > > > wrong character in the file, it is showing build issues. > > > > > > Please check the clean log. > > > > > > # make mrproper > > > CLEAN Documentation/devicetree/bindings > > > CLEAN scripts/basic > > > CLEAN scripts/dtc > > > # make dt_binding_check > > > DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml > > > HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/flattree.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/fstree.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/data.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/livetree.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/treesource.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/srcpos.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/checks.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/util.o > > > LEX scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.c > > > YACC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.[ch] > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-lexer.lex.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/dtc-parser.tab.o > > > HOSTCC scripts/dtc/yamltree.o > > > HOSTLD scripts/dtc/dtc > > > CHKDT Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: > > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: > > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: > > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: > > > 'additionalProperties' is a required property > > > SCHEMA Documentation/devicetree/bindings/processed-schema-examples.json > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml: > > > ignoring, error in schema: > > > warning: no schema found in file: > > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/litex/litex,soc-controller.yaml > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml: > > > ignoring, error in schema: > > > warning: no schema found in file: > > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/devapc.yaml > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml: ignoring, > > > error in schema: > > > warning: no schema found in file: > > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/coda.yaml > > > /w/linux/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml: > > > ignoring, error in schema: > > > warning: no schema found in file: > > > ./Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/litex,liteuart.yaml > > > DTEX Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dts > > > DTC Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml > > > CHECK Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.example.dt.yaml > > > > Any further comments? I'm planning to send v3. > > What comments do you need? Your schema and DTS are wrong. If you run > dtbs_check, which I mentioned in the first email, you would see the > result. Instead you pasted unrelevant check of other bindings and > later pasted dt_binding_check. It does not make sense, so I clarified: > > 2. Bindings pass, they are not a problem. You were running dtbs_check, right? > > And you pasted dt_binding_check, so it kind of closes the discussion. > I don't know what to add more. > I reported this problem already in v1, so please don't send the same > wrong code for the third time. Let's make it obvious: $ make -j4 dtbs_check DT_SCHEMA_FILES=Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml make[1]: Entering directory '/home/dev/linux/linux/out' UPD include/config/kernel.release DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dtb DTC arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml CHECK arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml /home/dev/linux/linux/out/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mm-icore-mx8mm-ctouch2.dt.yaml: /: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be fixed: ['engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2', 'engicam,icore-mx8mm', 'fsl,imx8mm'] is too long Additional items are not allowed ('fsl,imx8mm' was unexpected) Best regards, Krzysztof
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml index 67980dcef66d..e653e0a43016 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml @@ -667,6 +667,8 @@ properties: items: - enum: - beacon,imx8mm-beacon-kit # i.MX8MM Beacon Development Kit + - engicam,icore-mx8mm # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini SOM + - engicam,icore-mx8mm-ctouch2 # i.MX8MM Engicam i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 - fsl,imx8mm-ddr4-evk # i.MX8MM DDR4 EVK Board - fsl,imx8mm-evk # i.MX8MM EVK Board - kontron,imx8mm-n801x-som # i.MX8MM Kontron SL (N801X) SOM
i.Core MX8M Mini is an EDIMM SoM based on NXP i.MX8M Mini from Engicam. C.TOUCH 2.0 is a general purpose carrier board with capacitive touch interface support. i.Core MX8M Mini needs to mount on top of this Carrier board for creating complete i.Core MX8M Mini C.TOUCH 2.0 board. Add bindings for it. Signed-off-by: Jagan Teki <jagan@amarulasolutions.com> --- Changes for v2: - updated commit message Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/fsl.yaml | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)