Message ID | 20240418061053.96803-2-guanrui.huang@linux.alibaba.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | irqchip/gic-v3-its: Fix double free on error | expand |
I propose to improve the commit message another bit. How do you think about to append the text “in its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc()” to the summary phrase? > In its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc, when its_vpe_init() returns an error > with i > 0, its_vpe_irq_domain_free may free bitmap and vprop_page, > and then there is a double free in its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc. Can it be nicer to avoid the duplicate specification of a function name in this change description? > Fix it by calling its_vpe_irq_domain_free directly, bitmap and > vprop_page will be freed in this function. * Can the phrase “Fix it by” be omitted for an other imperative wording variant? * Would you like to separate sentences by a dot instead of combining them with a comma? Regards, Markus
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c index fca888b36680..2305f6b524a9 100644 --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-v3-its.c @@ -4561,13 +4561,8 @@ static int its_vpe_irq_domain_alloc(struct irq_domain *domain, unsigned int virq irqd_set_resend_when_in_progress(irq_get_irq_data(virq + i)); } - if (err) { - if (i > 0) - its_vpe_irq_domain_free(domain, virq, i); - - its_lpi_free(bitmap, base, nr_ids); - its_free_prop_table(vprop_page); - } + if (err) + its_vpe_irq_domain_free(domain, virq, i); return err; }