diff mbox series

[3/4] arm64: dts: mediatek: mt8365: drop incorrect power-domain-cells

Message ID 20240518211159.142920-3-krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org (mailing list archive)
State New
Headers show
Series [1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: mediatek,mt8195-scpsys: add mediatek,mt8365-scpsys | expand

Commit Message

Krzysztof Kozlowski May 18, 2024, 9:11 p.m. UTC
The top SCPSYS node is not a power domain provider.  It's child
"power-controller" is instead.  Fix dtbs_check warnings like:

  mt8365-evk.dtb: syscon@10006000: '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'

Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
---
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

Comments

AngeloGioacchino Del Regno May 20, 2024, 9:58 a.m. UTC | #1
Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> The top SCPSYS node is not a power domain provider.  It's child
> "power-controller" is instead.  Fix dtbs_check warnings like:
> 
>    mt8365-evk.dtb: syscon@10006000: '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>

Well if you're fixing that by migrating to scpsys compatible, you might as well
resolve all of the warnings in one commit, removing that power-domain-cells
property in patch [2/4], otherwise this one is technically a fix for that.

Please squash [2/4] and [3/4], like that it just makes more sense.

Cheers,
Angelo

> ---
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi | 1 -
>   1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
> index d3da5a22c2d2..eb449bfa8803 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
> @@ -302,7 +302,6 @@ syscfg_pctl: syscfg-pctl@10005000 {
>   		scpsys: syscon@10006000 {
>   			compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-scpsys", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
>   			reg = <0 0x10006000 0 0x1000>;
> -			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
>   
>   			/* System Power Manager */
>   			spm: power-controller {
Krzysztof Kozlowski May 20, 2024, 10:03 a.m. UTC | #2
On 20/05/2024 11:58, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>> The top SCPSYS node is not a power domain provider.  It's child
>> "power-controller" is instead.  Fix dtbs_check warnings like:
>>
>>    mt8365-evk.dtb: syscon@10006000: '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
> 
> Well if you're fixing that by migrating to scpsys compatible, you might as well
> resolve all of the warnings in one commit, removing that power-domain-cells
> property in patch [2/4], otherwise this one is technically a fix for that.
> 
> Please squash [2/4] and [3/4], like that it just makes more sense.
> 

That's independent thing. Previous compatible - syscfg - also did not
allow power domains. The difference is that bindings did not print a
warning without my change. We can reverse the patches if this is more
suitable.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
AngeloGioacchino Del Regno May 20, 2024, 10:06 a.m. UTC | #3
Il 20/05/24 12:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
> On 20/05/2024 11:58, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Il 18/05/24 23:11, Krzysztof Kozlowski ha scritto:
>>> The top SCPSYS node is not a power domain provider.  It's child
>>> "power-controller" is instead.  Fix dtbs_check warnings like:
>>>
>>>     mt8365-evk.dtb: syscon@10006000: '#power-domain-cells' does not match any of the regexes: 'pinctrl-[0-9]+'
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
>>
>> Well if you're fixing that by migrating to scpsys compatible, you might as well
>> resolve all of the warnings in one commit, removing that power-domain-cells
>> property in patch [2/4], otherwise this one is technically a fix for that.
>>
>> Please squash [2/4] and [3/4], like that it just makes more sense.
>>
> 
> That's independent thing. Previous compatible - syscfg - also did not
> allow power domains. The difference is that bindings did not print a
> warning without my change. We can reverse the patches if this is more
> suitable.
> 

You're still introducing a warning with patch 2.

As for swapping the order, that could also be a solution, but I still don't see
that as an independent thing - in any case, swapping them is something I can do
while applying, eventually.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
index d3da5a22c2d2..eb449bfa8803 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/mediatek/mt8365.dtsi
@@ -302,7 +302,6 @@  syscfg_pctl: syscfg-pctl@10005000 {
 		scpsys: syscon@10006000 {
 			compatible = "mediatek,mt8365-scpsys", "syscon", "simple-mfd";
 			reg = <0 0x10006000 0 0x1000>;
-			#power-domain-cells = <1>;
 
 			/* System Power Manager */
 			spm: power-controller {