diff mbox series

[v5,03/27] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a type for the CD entry

Message ID 3-v5-9a37e0c884ce+31e3-smmuv3_newapi_p2_jgg@nvidia.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Headers show
Series Update SMMUv3 to the modern iommu API (part 2/3) | expand

Commit Message

Jason Gunthorpe March 4, 2024, 11:43 p.m. UTC
Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a CD table entry
wrap it in a "struct arm_smmu_cd" with an array of the correct size. This
makes it much clearer which functions will comprise the "CD API".

Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
 drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Michael Shavit March 13, 2024, 9:44 a.m. UTC | #1
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 7:44 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a CD table entry
> wrap it in a "struct arm_smmu_cd" with an array of the correct size. This
> makes it much clearer which functions will comprise the "CD API".
>
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 9e9233331c4636..c60b067c1f553e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1219,7 +1219,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
>         WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
>  }
>
> -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
> +static struct arm_smmu_cd *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> +                                              u32 ssid)
>  {
>         __le64 *l1ptr;
>         unsigned int idx;
> @@ -1228,7 +1229,8 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
>         struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
>
>         if (cd_table->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)
> -               return cd_table->cdtab + ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +               return (struct arm_smmu_cd *)(cd_table->cdtab +
> +                                             ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS);

Can we define cd_table.cdtab as a union type to avoid this cast and
make the struct definition more explicit?

>
>         idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
>         l1_desc = &cd_table->l1_desc[idx];
> @@ -1242,7 +1244,7 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
>                 arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, false);
>         }
>         idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> -       return l1_desc->l2ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +       return &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
>  }
>
>  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> @@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>          */
>         u64 val;
>         bool cd_live;
> -       __le64 *cdptr;
> +       struct arm_smmu_cd *cdptr;
>         struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
>         struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
>
> @@ -1272,7 +1274,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>         if (!cdptr)
>                 return -ENOMEM;
>
> -       val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
> +       val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr->data[0]);
>         cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
>
>         if (!cd) { /* (5) */
> @@ -1289,9 +1291,9 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>                  * this substream's traffic
>                  */
>         } else { /* (1) and (2) */
> -               cdptr[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
> -               cdptr[2] = 0;
> -               cdptr[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
> +               cdptr->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
> +               cdptr->data[2] = 0;
> +               cdptr->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
>
>                 /*
>                  * STE may be live, and the SMMU might read dwords of this CD in any
> @@ -1323,7 +1325,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>          *   field within an aligned 64-bit span of a structure can be altered
>          *   without first making the structure invalid.
>          */
> -       WRITE_ONCE(cdptr[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
> +       WRITE_ONCE(cdptr->data[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
>         arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, true);
>         return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 23baf117e7e4b5..7078ed569fd4d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_ste {
>  #define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK     GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
>
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS              8
> +
> +struct arm_smmu_cd {
> +       __le64 data[CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS];
> +};
> +
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ          GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_TG0           GENMASK_ULL(7, 6)
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_IRGN0         GENMASK_ULL(9, 8)
> @@ -591,7 +596,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc {
>  };
>
>  struct arm_smmu_l1_ctx_desc {
> -       __le64                          *l2ptr;
> +       struct arm_smmu_cd              *l2ptr;
>         dma_addr_t                      l2ptr_dma;
>  };
>
> --
> 2.43.2
>
>

Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>
Nicolin Chen March 15, 2024, 3:12 a.m. UTC | #2
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:43:51PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a CD table entry
> wrap it in a "struct arm_smmu_cd" with an array of the correct size. This
> makes it much clearer which functions will comprise the "CD API".
> 
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>

Reviewed-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Moritz Fischer March 16, 2024, 6:10 p.m. UTC | #3
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 05:44:35PM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 7:44 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a CD table entry
> > wrap it in a "struct arm_smmu_cd" with an array of the correct size.  
> This
> > makes it much clearer which functions will comprise the "CD API".
> >
> > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c  
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index 9e9233331c4636..c60b067c1f553e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -1219,7 +1219,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> >         WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> >  }
> >
> > -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32  
> ssid)
> > +static struct arm_smmu_cd *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master  
> *master,
> > +                                              u32 ssid)
> >  {
> >         __le64 *l1ptr;
> >         unsigned int idx;
> > @@ -1228,7 +1229,8 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct  
> arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
> >         struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> >
> >         if (cd_table->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)
> > -               return cd_table->cdtab + ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> > +               return (struct arm_smmu_cd *)(cd_table->cdtab +
> > +                                             ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS);

> Can we define cd_table.cdtab as a union type to avoid this cast and
> make the struct definition more explicit?

+1, I think that'd make it more readable.

> >
> >         idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
> >         l1_desc = &cd_table->l1_desc[idx];
> > @@ -1242,7 +1244,7 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct  
> arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
> >                 arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, false);
> >         }
> >         idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> > -       return l1_desc->l2ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> > +       return &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
> >  }
> >
> >  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> > @@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct  
> arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> >          */
> >         u64 val;
> >         bool cd_live;
> > -       __le64 *cdptr;
> > +       struct arm_smmu_cd *cdptr;
> >         struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> >         struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
> >
> > @@ -1272,7 +1274,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct  
> arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> >         if (!cdptr)
> >                 return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > -       val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
> > +       val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr->data[0]);
> >         cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
> >
> >         if (!cd) { /* (5) */
> > @@ -1289,9 +1291,9 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct  
> arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> >                  * this substream's traffic
> >                  */
> >         } else { /* (1) and (2) */
> > -               cdptr[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr &  
> CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
> > -               cdptr[2] = 0;
> > -               cdptr[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
> > +               cdptr->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr &  
> CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
> > +               cdptr->data[2] = 0;
> > +               cdptr->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
> >
> >                 /*
> >                  * STE may be live, and the SMMU might read dwords of  
> this CD in any
> > @@ -1323,7 +1325,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct  
> arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> >          *   field within an aligned 64-bit span of a structure can be  
> altered
> >          *   without first making the structure invalid.
> >          */
> > -       WRITE_ONCE(cdptr[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
> > +       WRITE_ONCE(cdptr->data[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
> >         arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, true);
> >         return 0;
> >  }
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h  
> b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > index 23baf117e7e4b5..7078ed569fd4d3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> > @@ -282,6 +282,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_ste {
> >  #define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK     GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
> >
> >  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS              8
> > +
> > +struct arm_smmu_cd {
> > +       __le64 data[CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS];
> > +};
> > +
> >  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ          GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
> >  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_TG0           GENMASK_ULL(7, 6)
> >  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_IRGN0         GENMASK_ULL(9, 8)
> > @@ -591,7 +596,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc {
> >  };
> >
> >  struct arm_smmu_l1_ctx_desc {
> > -       __le64                          *l2ptr;
> > +       struct arm_smmu_cd              *l2ptr;
> >         dma_addr_t                      l2ptr_dma;
> >  };
> >
> > --
> > 2.43.2
> >
> >

> Reviewed-by: Michael Shavit <mshavit@google.com>

Reviewed-by: Moritz Fischer <moritzf@google.com>
Jason Gunthorpe March 18, 2024, 6:02 p.m. UTC | #4
On Wed, Mar 13, 2024 at 05:44:35PM +0800, Michael Shavit wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 7:44 AM Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com> wrote:
> >
> > Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a CD table entry
> > wrap it in a "struct arm_smmu_cd" with an array of the correct size. This
> > makes it much clearer which functions will comprise the "CD API".
> >
> > Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> >  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++++++-
> >  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > index 9e9233331c4636..c60b067c1f553e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> > @@ -1219,7 +1219,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
> >         WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
> >  }
> >
> > -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
> > +static struct arm_smmu_cd *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> > +                                              u32 ssid)
> >  {
> >         __le64 *l1ptr;
> >         unsigned int idx;
> > @@ -1228,7 +1229,8 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
> >         struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
> >
> >         if (cd_table->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)
> > -               return cd_table->cdtab + ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> > +               return (struct arm_smmu_cd *)(cd_table->cdtab +
> > +                                             ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS);
> 
> Can we define cd_table.cdtab as a union type to avoid this cast and
> make the struct definition more explicit?

Yes, those patches are in part 3 to fix the CD and STE to be like you
suggest. In the end the above looks like:

	if (cd_table->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)
		return cd_table->cdtab.linear + ssid;

Thanks,
Jason
Mostafa Saleh March 22, 2024, 5:52 p.m. UTC | #5
On Mon, Mar 04, 2024 at 07:43:51PM -0400, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> Instead of passing a naked __le16 * around to represent a CD table entry
> wrap it in a "struct arm_smmu_cd" with an array of the correct size. This
> makes it much clearer which functions will comprise the "CD API".
> 
> Tested-by: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
>  drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h |  7 ++++++-
>  2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index 9e9233331c4636..c60b067c1f553e 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1219,7 +1219,8 @@ static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
>  	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
>  }
>  
> -static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
> +static struct arm_smmu_cd *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
> +					       u32 ssid)
>  {
>  	__le64 *l1ptr;
>  	unsigned int idx;
> @@ -1228,7 +1229,8 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
>  
>  	if (cd_table->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)
> -		return cd_table->cdtab + ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +		return (struct arm_smmu_cd *)(cd_table->cdtab +
> +					      ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS);
>  
>  	idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
>  	l1_desc = &cd_table->l1_desc[idx];
> @@ -1242,7 +1244,7 @@ static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
>  		arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, false);
>  	}
>  	idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
> -	return l1_desc->l2ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
> +	return &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
>  }
>  
>  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
> @@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>  	 */
>  	u64 val;
>  	bool cd_live;
> -	__le64 *cdptr;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd *cdptr;
>  	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
>  	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
>  
> @@ -1272,7 +1274,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>  	if (!cdptr)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
> +	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr->data[0]);
>  	cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
>  
>  	if (!cd) { /* (5) */
> @@ -1289,9 +1291,9 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>  		 * this substream's traffic
>  		 */
>  	} else { /* (1) and (2) */
> -		cdptr[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
> -		cdptr[2] = 0;
> -		cdptr[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
> +		cdptr->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
> +		cdptr->data[2] = 0;
> +		cdptr->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
>  
>  		/*
>  		 * STE may be live, and the SMMU might read dwords of this CD in any
> @@ -1323,7 +1325,7 @@ int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
>  	 *   field within an aligned 64-bit span of a structure can be altered
>  	 *   without first making the structure invalid.
>  	 */
> -	WRITE_ONCE(cdptr[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
> +	WRITE_ONCE(cdptr->data[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
>  	arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, true);
>  	return 0;
>  }
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index 23baf117e7e4b5..7078ed569fd4d3 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -282,6 +282,11 @@ struct arm_smmu_ste {
>  #define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
>  
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS		8
> +
> +struct arm_smmu_cd {
> +	__le64 data[CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS];
> +};
> +
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_TG0		GENMASK_ULL(7, 6)
>  #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_IRGN0		GENMASK_ULL(9, 8)
> @@ -591,7 +596,7 @@ struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc {
>  };
>  
>  struct arm_smmu_l1_ctx_desc {
> -	__le64				*l2ptr;
> +	struct arm_smmu_cd		*l2ptr;
>  	dma_addr_t			l2ptr_dma;
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 2.43.2
>

Reviewed-by: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>

Thanks,
Mostafa
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 9e9233331c4636..c60b067c1f553e 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -1219,7 +1219,8 @@  static void arm_smmu_write_cd_l1_desc(__le64 *dst,
 	WRITE_ONCE(*dst, cpu_to_le64(val));
 }
 
-static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
+static struct arm_smmu_cd *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
+					       u32 ssid)
 {
 	__le64 *l1ptr;
 	unsigned int idx;
@@ -1228,7 +1229,8 @@  static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
 	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
 
 	if (cd_table->s1fmt == STRTAB_STE_0_S1FMT_LINEAR)
-		return cd_table->cdtab + ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
+		return (struct arm_smmu_cd *)(cd_table->cdtab +
+					      ssid * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS);
 
 	idx = ssid >> CTXDESC_SPLIT;
 	l1_desc = &cd_table->l1_desc[idx];
@@ -1242,7 +1244,7 @@  static __le64 *arm_smmu_get_cd_ptr(struct arm_smmu_master *master, u32 ssid)
 		arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, false);
 	}
 	idx = ssid & (CTXDESC_L2_ENTRIES - 1);
-	return l1_desc->l2ptr + idx * CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS;
+	return &l1_desc->l2ptr[idx];
 }
 
 int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
@@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
 	 */
 	u64 val;
 	bool cd_live;
-	__le64 *cdptr;
+	struct arm_smmu_cd *cdptr;
 	struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg *cd_table = &master->cd_table;
 	struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
 
@@ -1272,7 +1274,7 @@  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
 	if (!cdptr)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr[0]);
+	val = le64_to_cpu(cdptr->data[0]);
 	cd_live = !!(val & CTXDESC_CD_0_V);
 
 	if (!cd) { /* (5) */
@@ -1289,9 +1291,9 @@  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
 		 * this substream's traffic
 		 */
 	} else { /* (1) and (2) */
-		cdptr[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
-		cdptr[2] = 0;
-		cdptr[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
+		cdptr->data[1] = cpu_to_le64(cd->ttbr & CTXDESC_CD_1_TTB0_MASK);
+		cdptr->data[2] = 0;
+		cdptr->data[3] = cpu_to_le64(cd->mair);
 
 		/*
 		 * STE may be live, and the SMMU might read dwords of this CD in any
@@ -1323,7 +1325,7 @@  int arm_smmu_write_ctx_desc(struct arm_smmu_master *master, int ssid,
 	 *   field within an aligned 64-bit span of a structure can be altered
 	 *   without first making the structure invalid.
 	 */
-	WRITE_ONCE(cdptr[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
+	WRITE_ONCE(cdptr->data[0], cpu_to_le64(val));
 	arm_smmu_sync_cd(master, ssid, true);
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 23baf117e7e4b5..7078ed569fd4d3 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -282,6 +282,11 @@  struct arm_smmu_ste {
 #define CTXDESC_L1_DESC_L2PTR_MASK	GENMASK_ULL(51, 12)
 
 #define CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS		8
+
+struct arm_smmu_cd {
+	__le64 data[CTXDESC_CD_DWORDS];
+};
+
 #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_T0SZ		GENMASK_ULL(5, 0)
 #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_TG0		GENMASK_ULL(7, 6)
 #define CTXDESC_CD_0_TCR_IRGN0		GENMASK_ULL(9, 8)
@@ -591,7 +596,7 @@  struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc {
 };
 
 struct arm_smmu_l1_ctx_desc {
-	__le64				*l2ptr;
+	struct arm_smmu_cd		*l2ptr;
 	dma_addr_t			l2ptr_dma;
 };