@@ -453,6 +453,19 @@ static bool bmc150_apply_bosc0200_acpi_orientation(struct device *dev,
return false;
}
+static bool bmc150_apply_dual250e_acpi_orientation(struct device *dev,
+ struct iio_mount_matrix *orientation)
+{
+ struct iio_dev *indio_dev = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ if (strcmp(dev_name(dev), "i2c-DUAL250E:base") == 0)
+ indio_dev->label = "accel-base";
+ else
+ indio_dev->label = "accel-display";
+
+ return false; /* DUAL250E fwnodes have no mount matrix info */
+}
+
static bool bmc150_apply_acpi_orientation(struct device *dev,
struct iio_mount_matrix *orientation)
{
@@ -461,6 +474,9 @@ static bool bmc150_apply_acpi_orientation(struct device *dev,
if (adev && acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(adev, "BOSC0200", NULL))
return bmc150_apply_bosc0200_acpi_orientation(dev, orientation);
+ if (adev && acpi_dev_hid_uid_match(adev, "DUAL250E", NULL))
+ return bmc150_apply_dual250e_acpi_orientation(dev, orientation);
+
return false;
}
#else
Some Yoga laptops with 1 accelerometer in the display and 1 in the base, use an ACPI HID of DUAL250E instead of BOSC0200. Set the iio-device's label for DUAL250E devices to a value indicating which sensor is which, mirroring how we do this for BOSC0200 dual sensor devices. Note the DUAL250E fwnode unfortunately does not include a mount-matrix. Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> --- Changes in v2: - Rebase on top of the new "iio: accel: bmc150: Refactor bmc150_apply_acpi_orientation()" patch --- drivers/iio/accel/bmc150-accel-core.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)