diff mbox series

[v3,3/5] iio: adc: ad7192: Use VRef instead of AVdd as reference voltage source

Message ID 20230530075311.400686-4-fl.scratchpad@gmail.com (mailing list archive)
State Changes Requested
Headers show
Series Fix ad7192 driver issues | expand

Commit Message

Fabrizio Lamarque May 30, 2023, 7:53 a.m. UTC
From: Fabrizio Lamarque <fl.scratchpad@gmail.com>

Add missing vref-supply and fix avdd-supply used as if it were vref.

AD7192 requires three independent voltage sources, digital supply (on
pin DVdd), analog supply (on AVdd) and reference voltage (VRef on
alternate pin pair REFIN1 or REFIN2).

Emit a warning message when AVdd is used in place of VRef for backwards
compatibility.

Fixes: b581f748cce0 ("staging: iio: adc: ad7192: move out of staging")
Signed-off-by: Fabrizio Lamarque <fl.scratchpad@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c | 23 ++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Andy Shevchenko June 3, 2023, 12:03 p.m. UTC | #1
Tue, May 30, 2023 at 09:53:09AM +0200, fl.scratchpad@gmail.com kirjoitti:
> From: Fabrizio Lamarque <fl.scratchpad@gmail.com>
> 
> Add missing vref-supply and fix avdd-supply used as if it were vref.
> 
> AD7192 requires three independent voltage sources, digital supply (on
> pin DVdd), analog supply (on AVdd) and reference voltage (VRef on
> alternate pin pair REFIN1 or REFIN2).
> 
> Emit a warning message when AVdd is used in place of VRef for backwards
> compatibility.

...

> +	st->vref = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vref");
> +	if (!IS_ERR(st->vref)) {
> +		ret = regulator_enable(st->vref);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret,
> +					     "Failed to enable specified VRef supply\n");
> +
> +		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev, ad7192_reg_disable, st->vref);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +	} else if (PTR_ERR(st->vref) != -ENODEV) {
> +		return PTR_ERR(st->vref);
> +	}

Wouldn't this be better?

	if (IS_ERR(st->vref)) {
		if (PTR_ERR(st->vref) != -ENODEV)
			return PTR_ERR(st->vref);
	} else {

...

>  	if (ret)
>  		return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret, "Failed to enable specified DVdd supply\n");
>  
> -	ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->avdd);
> +

One blank line is enough.

> +	if (!IS_ERR(st->vref)) {
> +		ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->vref);

Why negative conditional? Usual pattern is to check for errors first, so

	if (IS_ERR(st->vref)) {
		dev_warn(...);
		...
	} else {
		ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->vref);
	}

> +	} else {
> +		dev_warn(&spi->dev, "Using AVdd in place of VRef. Likely an old DTS\n");
> +		ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->avdd);
> +	}
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
index 5a9c8898f8af..bc41323ea810 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad7192.c
@@ -177,6 +177,7 @@  struct ad7192_chip_info {
 struct ad7192_state {
 	const struct ad7192_chip_info	*chip_info;
 	struct regulator		*avdd;
+	struct regulator		*vref;
 	struct clk			*mclk;
 	u16				int_vref_mv;
 	u32				fclk;
@@ -1014,11 +1015,31 @@  static int ad7192_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 
+	st->vref = devm_regulator_get_optional(&spi->dev, "vref");
+	if (!IS_ERR(st->vref)) {
+		ret = regulator_enable(st->vref);
+		if (ret)
+			return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret,
+					     "Failed to enable specified VRef supply\n");
+
+		ret = devm_add_action_or_reset(&spi->dev, ad7192_reg_disable, st->vref);
+		if (ret)
+			return ret;
+	} else if (PTR_ERR(st->vref) != -ENODEV) {
+		return PTR_ERR(st->vref);
+	}
+
 	ret = devm_regulator_get_enable(&spi->dev, "dvdd");
 	if (ret)
 		return dev_err_probe(&spi->dev, ret, "Failed to enable specified DVdd supply\n");
 
-	ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->avdd);
+
+	if (!IS_ERR(st->vref)) {
+		ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->vref);
+	} else {
+		dev_warn(&spi->dev, "Using AVdd in place of VRef. Likely an old DTS\n");
+		ret = regulator_get_voltage(st->avdd);
+	}
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		dev_err(&spi->dev, "Device tree error, reference voltage undefined\n");
 		return ret;