| Message ID | 20220914060147.1934064-1-mcgrof@kernel.org (mailing list archive) |
|---|---|
| Headers | show |
| Series | SPDX: add copyleft-next-0.3.1 | expand |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:01:45PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with > the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out > from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that. > > Changes on this v10: > > o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why > the OR operator in the SPDX license name > o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner > as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec > o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as > the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series > > The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its > changes, its history can be found here: > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/ > > Luis Chamberlain (2): > LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license > testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag *poke* Luis
On Fri, Sep 30, 2022 at 01:06:50PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 11:01:45PM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote: > > As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with > > the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out > > from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that. > > > > Changes on this v10: > > > > o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why > > the OR operator in the SPDX license name > > o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner > > as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec > > o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as > > the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series > > > > The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its > > changes, its history can be found here: > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/ > > > > Luis Chamberlain (2): > > LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license > > testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag > > *poke* I was waiting for someone else to review this before considering it...
As suggested by Thomas Gleixner, I'm following up to move on with the SPDX tag needed for copyleft-next-0.3.1. I've split this out from the test_sysfs selftest so to separate review from that. Changes on this v10: o embraced paragraph from Thomas Gleixner which helps explain why the OR operator in the SPDX license name o dropped the GPL-2.0 and GPL-2.0+ tags as suggested by Thomas Gleixner as these are outdated (still valid) in the SPDX spec o trimmed the Cc list to remove the test_sysfs / block layer / fs folks as the test_sysfs stuff is now dropped from consideration in this series The last series was at v9 but it also had the test_sysfs and its changes, its history can be found here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211029184500.2821444-1-mcgrof@kernel.org/ Luis Chamberlain (2): LICENSES: Add the copyleft-next-0.3.1 license testing: use the copyleft-next-0.3.1 SPDX tag LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1 | 236 +++++++++++++++++++++++ lib/test_kmod.c | 12 +- lib/test_sysctl.c | 12 +- tools/testing/selftests/kmod/kmod.sh | 13 +- tools/testing/selftests/sysctl/sysctl.sh | 12 +- 5 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) create mode 100644 LICENSES/dual/copyleft-next-0.3.1