Message ID | 20230722060706.79759-1-atulpant.linux@gmail.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | Changes Requested |
Headers | show |
Series | [v5] selftests: rtc: Fixes rtctest error handling. | expand |
Hi, This is the semi-friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing list. I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore. Please do not bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time. Patch submitter, please ignore Markus's suggestion; you do not need to follow it at all. The person/bot/AI that sent it is being ignored by almost all Linux kernel maintainers for having a persistent pattern of behavior of producing distracting and pointless commentary, and inability to adapt to feedback. Please feel free to also ignore emails from them. thanks, greg k-h's patch email bot
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c index 63ce02d1d5cc..630fef735c7e 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/rtc/rtctest.c @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ #include <unistd.h> #include "../kselftest_harness.h" +#include "../kselftest.h" #define NUM_UIE 3 #define ALARM_DELTA 3 @@ -419,6 +420,8 @@ __constructor_order_last(void) int main(int argc, char **argv) { + int ret = -1; + switch (argc) { case 2: rtc_file = argv[1]; @@ -430,5 +433,11 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv) return 1; } - return test_harness_run(argc, argv); + // Run the test if rtc_file is valid + if (access(rtc_file, F_OK) == 0) + ret = test_harness_run(argc, argv); + else + ksft_exit_fail_msg("[ERROR]: Cannot access rtc file %s - Exiting\n", rtc_file); + + return ret; }