Message ID | 20220708165104.5005-1-logang@deltatee.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | DMA Mapping P2PDMA Pages | expand |
I'd like to hear from Robin on the dma-iommu parts, but otherwise this looks fine to me modulo a little filed naming change I could handle when applying this.
I've applied this to the dma-mapping for-next branch. I'd have liked a review from Robin, but as he seems to be out and the rework was to fit his comments I'd rather have us unblocked before the end of the merge window.
On 2022-07-26 05:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I've applied this to the dma-mapping for-next branch. > > I'd have liked a review from Robin, but as he seems to be out and the > rework was to fit his comments I'd rather have us unblocked before > the end of the merge window. Great thanks! If Robin has some feedback when he gets back I'd be happy to make a couple more cleanup patches. Logan
On 2022-07-26 16:55, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > > > On 2022-07-26 05:29, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> I've applied this to the dma-mapping for-next branch. >> >> I'd have liked a review from Robin, but as he seems to be out and the >> rework was to fit his comments I'd rather have us unblocked before >> the end of the merge window. > > Great thanks! If Robin has some feedback when he gets back I'd be happy > to make a couple more cleanup patches. Indeed I've been taking some (rather overdue) holiday the last couple of weeks, sorry I forgot to take a look at this version beforehand. From a quick skim, nothing stands out as objectionable; thanks for taking my suggestions on board! At some point once this lands I'll have a go at using the new flags to improve iommu-dma bounce buffering, so if I do spot anything else while I'm in there I'm sure could clean it up myself. Cheers, Robin.