Message ID | 20240129034924.817005-1-haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | fix vt-d hard lockup when hotplug ATS capable device | expand |
Bjorn, On 1/29/2024 11:49 AM, Ethan Zhao wrote: > This patchset is used to fix vt-d hard lockup reported when surprise > unplug ATS capable endpoint device connects to system via PCIe switch > as following topology. > > +-[0000:15]-+-00.0 Intel Corporation Ice Lake Memory Map/VT-d > | +-00.1 Intel Corporation Ice Lake Mesh 2 PCIe > | +-00.2 Intel Corporation Ice Lake RAS > | +-00.4 Intel Corporation Device 0b23 > | \-01.0-[16-1b]----00.0-[17-1b]--+-00.0-[18]----00.0 > NVIDIA Corporation Device 2324 > | +-01.0-[19]----00.0 > Mellanox Technologies MT2910 Family [ConnectX-7] > > User brought endpoint device 19:00.0's link down by flapping it's hotplug > capable slot 17:01.0 link control register, as sequence DLLSC response, > pciehp_ist() will unload device driver and power it off, durning device > driver is unloading an iommu device-TLB invalidation (Intel VT-d spec, or > 'ATS Invalidation' in PCIe spec) request issued to that link down device, > thus a long time completion/timeout waiting in interrupt context causes > continuous hard lockup warnning and system hang. > > Other detail, see every patch commit log. > > patch [1&2] were tested by yehaorong@bytedance.com on stable v6.7-rc4. > patch [1-5] passed compiling on stable v6.8-rc2. > > change log: > v12: > - use base-commit tag to format patch. > - fix building issue on v6.8-rc2 repported by lkp@intel.com. > v11: > - update per latest comment and suggestion from Baolu and YiLiu. > - split refactoring patch into two patches, [3/5] for simplify parameters > and [4/5] for pdev parameter passing. > - re-order patches. > - fold target device presence check into qi_check_fault(). > - combine patch[2][5] in v10 into one patch[5]. > - some commit description correctness. > - add fixes tag to patch[2/5]. > - rebased on 6.8rc1 > v10: > - refactor qi_submit_sync() and its callers to get pci_dev instance, as > Kevin pointed out add target_flush_dev to iommu is not right. > v9: > - unify all spelling of ATS Invalidation adhere to PCIe spec per Bjorn's > suggestion. > v8: > - add a patch to break the loop for timeout device-TLB invalidation, as > Bjorn said there is possibility device just no response but not gone. > v7: > - reorder patches and revise commit log per Bjorn's guide. > - other code and commit log revise per Lukas' suggestion. > - rebased to stable v6.7-rc6. > v6: > - add two patches to break out device-TLB invalidation if device is gone. > v5: > - add a patch try to fix the rare case (surprise remove a device in > safe removal process). not work because surprise removal handling can't > re-enter when another safe removal is in process. > v4: > - move the PCI device state checking after ATS per Baolu's suggestion. > v3: > - fix commit description typo. > v2: > - revise commit[1] description part according to Lukas' suggestion. > - revise commit[2] description to clarify the issue's impact. > v1: > - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20231213034637.2603013-1-haifeng.zhao@ > linux.intel.com/T/ > > > Thanks, > Ethan > > > > > Ethan Zhao (5): > PCI: make pci_dev_is_disconnected() helper public for other drivers > iommu/vt-d: don't issue ATS Invalidation request when device is > disconnected > iommu/vt-d: simplify parameters of qi_submit_sync() ATS invalidation > callers > iommu/vt-d: pass pdev parameter for qi_check_fault() and refactor > callers > iommu/vt-d: improve ITE fault handling if target device isn't present > > drivers/iommu/intel/dmar.c | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++------ > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 29 +++--------- > drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.h | 20 ++++---- > drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 2 +- > drivers/iommu/intel/nested.c | 9 +--- > drivers/iommu/intel/pasid.c | 12 ++--- > drivers/iommu/intel/svm.c | 23 +++++----- > drivers/pci/pci.h | 5 -- > include/linux/pci.h | 5 ++ > 9 files changed, 98 insertions(+), 78 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: 41bccc98fb7931d63d03f326a746ac4d429c1dd3 I got mail delivery failure message from Gmail for "unsolicited mail", I don't know if you could read it by linux-pci mail list. the vt-d maintainer is going to pick up this patchset, may I ask your 'ack' for the pci change if no more comment from you ? Thanks, Ethan