diff mbox

[v6,20/30] sparc/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity

Message ID 1425868467-9667-21-git-send-email-wangyijing@huawei.com (mailing list archive)
State New, archived
Delegated to: Bjorn Helgaas
Headers show

Commit Message

Yijing Wang March 9, 2015, 2:34 a.m. UTC
Now we could use pci_scan_host_bridge() to scan
pci buses, provide sparc specific pci_host_bridge_ops.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
CC: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
---
 arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

Comments

Bjorn Helgaas March 12, 2015, 3:30 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 10:34:17AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Now we could use pci_scan_host_bridge() to scan
> pci buses, provide sparc specific pci_host_bridge_ops.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
> CC: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> CC: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> ---
>  arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> index 21f804a..7e28f74 100644
> --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
> @@ -650,12 +650,25 @@ static void pci_claim_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
>  		pci_claim_bus_resources(child_bus);
>  }
>  
> +static void pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus(
> +		struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> +{
> +	struct pci_pbm_info *pbm = dev_get_drvdata(&host->dev);
> +	struct device_node *node = pbm->op->dev.of_node;
> +
> +	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, host->bus);
> +}
> +
> +static struct pci_host_bridge_ops phb_ops = {
> +	.scan_bus = pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus,
> +};
> +
>  struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
>  				 struct device *parent)
>  {
>  	LIST_HEAD(resources);
>  	struct device_node *node = pbm->op->dev.of_node;
> -	struct pci_bus *bus;
> +	struct pci_host_bridge *host;
>  
>  	printk("PCI: Scanning PBM %s\n", node->full_name);
>  
> @@ -667,22 +680,21 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
>  	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busno;
>  	pbm->busn.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUS;
>  	pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent,
> +	host = pci_scan_host_bridge(parent,
>  			PCI_DOMBUS(pbm->index, pbm->pci_first_busno),
> -			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources);
> -	if (!bus) {
> -		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
> +			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources, &phb_ops);
> +	if (!host) {
> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create host bridge for %s\n",
>  		       node->full_name);
>  		pci_free_resource_list(&resources);
>  		return NULL;
>  	}
>  

I would keep "bus" and set it here:

	bus = host->bus;

That would remove some lines from your patch that really didn't change,
which makes it easier to see what actually *is* changing, namely, you're
removing the pci_of_scan_bus() call because it is now done inside
pci_scan_host_bridge().

> -	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
> -	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
> +	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(host->bus);
>  
> -	pci_claim_bus_resources(bus);
> -	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
> -	return bus;
> +	pci_claim_bus_resources(host->bus);
> +	pci_bus_add_devices(host->bus);
> +	return host->bus;
>  }
>  
>  void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *pbus)
> -- 
> 1.7.1
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Yijing Wang March 12, 2015, 1:17 p.m. UTC | #2
>> @@ -667,22 +680,21 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
>>  	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busno;
>>  	pbm->busn.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUS;
>>  	pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent,
>> +	host = pci_scan_host_bridge(parent,
>>  			PCI_DOMBUS(pbm->index, pbm->pci_first_busno),
>> -			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources);
>> -	if (!bus) {
>> -		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
>> +			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources, &phb_ops);
>> +	if (!host) {
>> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create host bridge for %s\n",
>>  		       node->full_name);
>>  		pci_free_resource_list(&resources);
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	}
>>  
> 
> I would keep "bus" and set it here:
> 
> 	bus = host->bus;
> 
> That would remove some lines from your patch that really didn't change,
> which makes it easier to see what actually *is* changing, namely, you're
> removing the pci_of_scan_bus() call because it is now done inside
> pci_scan_host_bridge().
> 

Yes, keep it will make the code more clean, thanks!

>> -	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
>> -	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(host->bus);
>>  
>> -	pci_claim_bus_resources(bus);
>> -	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>> -	return bus;
>> +	pci_claim_bus_resources(host->bus);
>> +	pci_bus_add_devices(host->bus);
>> +	return host->bus;
>>  }
>>  
>>  void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *pbus)
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
> 
> .
>
diff mbox

Patch

diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
index 21f804a..7e28f74 100644
--- a/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
+++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/pci.c
@@ -650,12 +650,25 @@  static void pci_claim_bus_resources(struct pci_bus *bus)
 		pci_claim_bus_resources(child_bus);
 }
 
+static void pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus(
+		struct pci_host_bridge *host)
+{
+	struct pci_pbm_info *pbm = dev_get_drvdata(&host->dev);
+	struct device_node *node = pbm->op->dev.of_node;
+
+	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, host->bus);
+}
+
+static struct pci_host_bridge_ops phb_ops = {
+	.scan_bus = pci_host_bridge_of_scan_bus,
+};
+
 struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 				 struct device *parent)
 {
 	LIST_HEAD(resources);
 	struct device_node *node = pbm->op->dev.of_node;
-	struct pci_bus *bus;
+	struct pci_host_bridge *host;
 
 	printk("PCI: Scanning PBM %s\n", node->full_name);
 
@@ -667,22 +680,21 @@  struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
 	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busno;
 	pbm->busn.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUS;
 	pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
-	bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent,
+	host = pci_scan_host_bridge(parent,
 			PCI_DOMBUS(pbm->index, pbm->pci_first_busno),
-			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources);
-	if (!bus) {
-		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
+			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources, &phb_ops);
+	if (!host) {
+		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create host bridge for %s\n",
 		       node->full_name);
 		pci_free_resource_list(&resources);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
-	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
+	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(host->bus);
 
-	pci_claim_bus_resources(bus);
-	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
-	return bus;
+	pci_claim_bus_resources(host->bus);
+	pci_bus_add_devices(host->bus);
+	return host->bus;
 }
 
 void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *pbus)