Message ID | 1467621574-8277-9-git-send-email-hch@lst.de (mailing list archive) |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Delegated to: | Bjorn Helgaas |
Headers | show |
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:39:29PM +0900, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Set the affinity_mask in the PCI device before allocating vectors so that > the affinity can be propagated through the MSI descriptor structures to > the core IRQ code. Add a new helper __pci_enable_msi_range which is > similar to __pci_enable_msix_range introduced in the last patch so that > we can allocate the affinity mask in a self-contained fashion and for the > right number of vectors. > > A new PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY flag is added to pci_alloc_irq_vectors so that > this function can also be used by drivers that don't wish to use the > automatic affinity assignment. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> > --- > Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt | 3 +- > drivers/pci/msi.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- > include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ > 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt > index 35d1326..dcd3f6d 100644 > --- a/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt > +++ b/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt > @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ argument set to this limit, and the PCI core will return -ENOSPC if it can't > meet the minimum number of vectors. > The flags argument should normally be set to 0, but can be used to > pass the PCI_IRQ_NOMSI and PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX flag in case a device claims > -to support MSI or MSI-X, but the support is broken. > +to support MSI or MSI-X, but the support is broken, or to PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY > +if the driver does not wish to use the automatic affinity assignment feature. > > To get the Linux IRQ numbers passed to request_irq and free_irq > and the vectors use the following function: > diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c > index 6b0834d..7f38e07 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c > @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ static struct msi_desc *msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec) > entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1; > entry->msi_attrib.multiple = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec)); > entry->nvec_used = nvec; > + entry->affinity = dev->irq_affinity; irq_create_affinity_mask() bails out with no affinity in case of single vector, but alloc_descs() (see below (*)) assigns the whole affinity mask. It should be consistent instead. Actually, I just realized pci_alloc_irq_vectors() should probably call irq_create_affinity_mask() and handle it in a consistent way for all four cases: MSI-X, mulit-MSI, MSI and legacy. Optionally, the three latter could be dropped for now so you could proceed with NVMe. > if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) > entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64; > @@ -679,10 +680,18 @@ static void __iomem *msix_map_region(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned nr_entries) > static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec) > { > + const struct cpumask *mask = NULL; > struct msi_desc *entry; > - int i; > + int cpu = -1, i; > > for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { > + if (dev->irq_affinity) { > + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, dev->irq_affinity); > + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) > + cpu = cpumask_first(dev->irq_affinity); > + mask = cpumask_of(cpu); > + } > + (*) In the future IRQ vs CPU mapping 1:N is possible/desirable so I suppose this piece of code worth a comment or better - a separate function. In fact, this algorithm already exists in alloc_descs(), which makes even more sense to factor it out: for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { if (affinity) { cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, affinity); if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) cpu = cpumask_first(affinity); node = cpu_to_node(cpu); /* * For single allocations we use the caller provided * mask otherwise we use the mask of the target cpu */ mask = cnt == 1 ? affinity : cpumask_of(cpu); } [...] } > entry = alloc_msi_entry(&dev->dev); > if (!entry) { > if (!i) > @@ -699,6 +708,7 @@ static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, > entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; > entry->mask_base = base; > entry->nvec_used = 1; > + entry->affinity = mask; > > list_add_tail(&entry->list, dev_to_msi_list(&dev->dev)); > } > @@ -1121,8 +1131,53 @@ int pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, > } > EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msix_range); > > +static int __pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int min_vecs, int max_vecs, So I won't comment on this function before the above is decided. > + unsigned int flags) > +{ > + int vecs, ret; > + > + if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, min_vecs)) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + vecs = pci_msi_vec_count(dev); > + if (vecs < 0) > + return vecs; > + if (vecs < min_vecs) > + return -EINVAL; > + if (vecs > max_vecs) > + vecs = max_vecs; > + > +retry: > + if (vecs < min_vecs) > + return -ENOSPC; > + > + if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY)) { > + dev->irq_affinity = irq_create_affinity_mask(&vecs); > + if (vecs < min_vecs) { > + ret = -ERANGE; > + goto out_fail; > + } > + } > + > + ret = msi_capability_init(dev, vecs); > + if (ret) > + goto out_fail; > + > + return vecs; > + > +out_fail: > + kfree(dev->irq_affinity); > + if (ret >= 0) { > + /* retry with the actually supported number of vectors */ > + vecs = ret; > + goto retry; > + } > + > + return ret; > +} > + > static int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs, > - unsigned int max_vecs) > + unsigned int max_vecs, unsigned int flags) > { > int vecs = max_vecs, ret, i; > > @@ -1138,6 +1193,13 @@ retry: > for (i = 0; i < vecs; i++) > dev->msix_vectors[i].entry = i; > > + if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY)) { > + dev->irq_affinity = irq_create_affinity_mask(&vecs); > + ret = -ENOSPC; > + if (vecs < min_vecs) > + goto out_fail; > + } > + > ret = pci_enable_msix(dev, dev->msix_vectors, vecs); > if (ret) > goto out_fail; > @@ -1147,6 +1209,8 @@ retry: > out_fail: > kfree(dev->msix_vectors); > dev->msix_vectors = NULL; > + kfree(dev->irq_affinity); > + dev->irq_affinity = NULL; > > if (ret >= 0) { > /* retry with the actually supported number of vectors */ > @@ -1180,13 +1244,13 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs, > int vecs; > > if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX)) { > - vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs); > + vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, flags); > if (vecs > 0) > return vecs; > } > > if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSI)) { > - vecs = pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs); > + vecs = __pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, flags); > if (vecs > 0) > return vecs; > } > diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h > index 129871f..6a64c54 100644 > --- a/include/linux/pci.h > +++ b/include/linux/pci.h > @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct pci_dev { > */ > unsigned int irq; > struct msix_entry *msix_vectors; > + struct cpumask *irq_affinity; > struct resource resource[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* I/O and memory regions + expansion ROMs */ > > bool match_driver; /* Skip attaching driver */ > @@ -1240,6 +1241,7 @@ int pci_set_vga_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool decode, > > #define PCI_IRQ_NOMSI (1 << 0) /* don't try to use MSI interrupts */ > #define PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX (1 << 1) /* don't try to use MSI-X interrupts */ > +#define PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY (1 << 2) /* don't auto-assign affinity */ > > /* kmem_cache style wrapper around pci_alloc_consistent() */ > > -- > 2.1.4 > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:05:01PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > irq_create_affinity_mask() bails out with no affinity in case of single > vector, but alloc_descs() (see below (*)) assigns the whole affinity > mask. It should be consistent instead. I don't understand the comment. If we only have one vector (of any kinds) there is no need to create an affinity mask, we'll leave the interrupt to the existing irq balancing code. > Actually, I just realized pci_alloc_irq_vectors() should probably call > irq_create_affinity_mask() and handle it in a consistent way for all four > cases: MSI-X, mulit-MSI, MSI and legacy. That's what the earlier versions did, but you correctly pointed out that we should call irq_create_affinity_mask only after we have reduced the number of vectors to the number that the bridges can route, i.e. that we have to move it into the pci_enable_msi(x)_range main loop. > Optionally, the three latter could be dropped for now so you could proceed > with NVMe. NVMe cares for all these cases at least in theory. > (*) In the future IRQ vs CPU mapping 1:N is possible/desirable so I suppose > this piece of code worth a comment or better - a separate function. In fact, > this algorithm already exists in alloc_descs(), which makes even more sense > to factor it out: > > for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++) { > if (affinity) { > cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, affinity); > if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) > cpu = cpumask_first(affinity); > node = cpu_to_node(cpu); > > /* > * For single allocations we use the caller provided > * mask otherwise we use the mask of the target cpu > */ > mask = cnt == 1 ? affinity : cpumask_of(cpu); > } > > [...] While these two pieces of code look very similar there is an important difference in why and how the mask is calculated. In alloc_descs() the difference here is that cnt = 1 is the MSI-X case where the passed in affinity is that for the MSI-X descriptor which is for a single vector. in the MSI case where we have multiple vectors per descriptor a different affinity is asigned for each vector based of a single passed in mask. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 05:57:51AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 01:05:01PM +0200, Alexander Gordeev wrote: > > irq_create_affinity_mask() bails out with no affinity in case of single > > vector, but alloc_descs() (see below (*)) assigns the whole affinity > > mask. It should be consistent instead. > > I don't understand the comment. If we only have one vector (of any > kinds) there is no need to create an affinity mask, we'll leave the > interrupt to the existing irq balancing code. I got impression the affinity mask is assigned differently i.e. for single MSI mode vs legacy mode. But I might be wrong here - I have to look into the code again. Anyway, if it is the case it could be addressed afterwards IMHO. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt b/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt index 35d1326..dcd3f6d 100644 --- a/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt +++ b/Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt @@ -95,7 +95,8 @@ argument set to this limit, and the PCI core will return -ENOSPC if it can't meet the minimum number of vectors. The flags argument should normally be set to 0, but can be used to pass the PCI_IRQ_NOMSI and PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX flag in case a device claims -to support MSI or MSI-X, but the support is broken. +to support MSI or MSI-X, but the support is broken, or to PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY +if the driver does not wish to use the automatic affinity assignment feature. To get the Linux IRQ numbers passed to request_irq and free_irq and the vectors use the following function: diff --git a/drivers/pci/msi.c b/drivers/pci/msi.c index 6b0834d..7f38e07 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/msi.c +++ b/drivers/pci/msi.c @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ static struct msi_desc *msi_setup_entry(struct pci_dev *dev, int nvec) entry->msi_attrib.multi_cap = (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_QMASK) >> 1; entry->msi_attrib.multiple = ilog2(__roundup_pow_of_two(nvec)); entry->nvec_used = nvec; + entry->affinity = dev->irq_affinity; if (control & PCI_MSI_FLAGS_64BIT) entry->mask_pos = dev->msi_cap + PCI_MSI_MASK_64; @@ -679,10 +680,18 @@ static void __iomem *msix_map_region(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned nr_entries) static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, struct msix_entry *entries, int nvec) { + const struct cpumask *mask = NULL; struct msi_desc *entry; - int i; + int cpu = -1, i; for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) { + if (dev->irq_affinity) { + cpu = cpumask_next(cpu, dev->irq_affinity); + if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids) + cpu = cpumask_first(dev->irq_affinity); + mask = cpumask_of(cpu); + } + entry = alloc_msi_entry(&dev->dev); if (!entry) { if (!i) @@ -699,6 +708,7 @@ static int msix_setup_entries(struct pci_dev *dev, void __iomem *base, entry->msi_attrib.default_irq = dev->irq; entry->mask_base = base; entry->nvec_used = 1; + entry->affinity = mask; list_add_tail(&entry->list, dev_to_msi_list(&dev->dev)); } @@ -1121,8 +1131,53 @@ int pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, struct msix_entry *entries, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(pci_enable_msix_range); +static int __pci_enable_msi_range(struct pci_dev *dev, int min_vecs, int max_vecs, + unsigned int flags) +{ + int vecs, ret; + + if (!pci_msi_supported(dev, min_vecs)) + return -EINVAL; + + vecs = pci_msi_vec_count(dev); + if (vecs < 0) + return vecs; + if (vecs < min_vecs) + return -EINVAL; + if (vecs > max_vecs) + vecs = max_vecs; + +retry: + if (vecs < min_vecs) + return -ENOSPC; + + if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY)) { + dev->irq_affinity = irq_create_affinity_mask(&vecs); + if (vecs < min_vecs) { + ret = -ERANGE; + goto out_fail; + } + } + + ret = msi_capability_init(dev, vecs); + if (ret) + goto out_fail; + + return vecs; + +out_fail: + kfree(dev->irq_affinity); + if (ret >= 0) { + /* retry with the actually supported number of vectors */ + vecs = ret; + goto retry; + } + + return ret; +} + static int __pci_enable_msix_range(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs, - unsigned int max_vecs) + unsigned int max_vecs, unsigned int flags) { int vecs = max_vecs, ret, i; @@ -1138,6 +1193,13 @@ retry: for (i = 0; i < vecs; i++) dev->msix_vectors[i].entry = i; + if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY)) { + dev->irq_affinity = irq_create_affinity_mask(&vecs); + ret = -ENOSPC; + if (vecs < min_vecs) + goto out_fail; + } + ret = pci_enable_msix(dev, dev->msix_vectors, vecs); if (ret) goto out_fail; @@ -1147,6 +1209,8 @@ retry: out_fail: kfree(dev->msix_vectors); dev->msix_vectors = NULL; + kfree(dev->irq_affinity); + dev->irq_affinity = NULL; if (ret >= 0) { /* retry with the actually supported number of vectors */ @@ -1180,13 +1244,13 @@ int pci_alloc_irq_vectors(struct pci_dev *dev, unsigned int min_vecs, int vecs; if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX)) { - vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs); + vecs = __pci_enable_msix_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, flags); if (vecs > 0) return vecs; } if (!(flags & PCI_IRQ_NOMSI)) { - vecs = pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs); + vecs = __pci_enable_msi_range(dev, min_vecs, max_vecs, flags); if (vecs > 0) return vecs; } diff --git a/include/linux/pci.h b/include/linux/pci.h index 129871f..6a64c54 100644 --- a/include/linux/pci.h +++ b/include/linux/pci.h @@ -321,6 +321,7 @@ struct pci_dev { */ unsigned int irq; struct msix_entry *msix_vectors; + struct cpumask *irq_affinity; struct resource resource[DEVICE_COUNT_RESOURCE]; /* I/O and memory regions + expansion ROMs */ bool match_driver; /* Skip attaching driver */ @@ -1240,6 +1241,7 @@ int pci_set_vga_state(struct pci_dev *pdev, bool decode, #define PCI_IRQ_NOMSI (1 << 0) /* don't try to use MSI interrupts */ #define PCI_IRQ_NOMSIX (1 << 1) /* don't try to use MSI-X interrupts */ +#define PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY (1 << 2) /* don't auto-assign affinity */ /* kmem_cache style wrapper around pci_alloc_consistent() */
Set the affinity_mask in the PCI device before allocating vectors so that the affinity can be propagated through the MSI descriptor structures to the core IRQ code. Add a new helper __pci_enable_msi_range which is similar to __pci_enable_msix_range introduced in the last patch so that we can allocate the affinity mask in a self-contained fashion and for the right number of vectors. A new PCI_IRQ_NOAFFINITY flag is added to pci_alloc_irq_vectors so that this function can also be used by drivers that don't wish to use the automatic affinity assignment. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> --- Documentation/PCI/MSI-HOWTO.txt | 3 +- drivers/pci/msi.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/linux/pci.h | 2 ++ 3 files changed, 72 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)