diff mbox series

PCI: of: Fix memory leak when of_changeset_create_node() failed

Message ID 1694715351-58279-1-git-send-email-lizhi.hou@amd.com (mailing list archive)
State Superseded
Headers show
Series PCI: of: Fix memory leak when of_changeset_create_node() failed | expand

Commit Message

Lizhi Hou Sept. 14, 2023, 6:15 p.m. UTC
Destroy and free cset when failure happens.

Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230911171319.495bb837@bootlin.com/
Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
---
 drivers/pci/of.c | 6 +++++-
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Herve Codina Sept. 15, 2023, 7:04 a.m. UTC | #1
Hi Lizhi

On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:15:51 -0700
Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com> wrote:

> Destroy and free cset when failure happens.
> 
> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
> Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230911171319.495bb837@bootlin.com/
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/of.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index 2af64bcb7da3..67bbfa2fca59 100644

Why this patch alone ?
The issue fixed by this patch is related to the patch 2 in a series under review
  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/ZQGaSr+G5qu%2F8nJZ@smile.fi.intel.com/
Is the patch 2 in this series already applied by some maintainers ?

You have to fix the patch in the series sending a new iteration of the series.

This patch alone does not make sense.

Otherwise, the modifications to fix the issue seem good.

Regards,
Hervé

> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -663,7 +663,6 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	np = of_changeset_create_node(cset, ppnode, name);
>  	if (!np)
>  		goto failed;
> -	np->data = cset;
>  
>  	ret = of_pci_add_properties(pdev, cset, np);
>  	if (ret)
> @@ -673,12 +672,17 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>  	if (ret)
>  		goto failed;
>  
> +	np->data = cset;
>  	pdev->dev.of_node = np;
>  	kfree(name);
>  
>  	return;
>  
>  failed:
> +	if (cset) {
> +		of_changeset_destroy(cset);
> +		kfree(cset);
> +	}
>  	if (np)
>  		of_node_put(np);
>  	kfree(name);
Lizhi Hou Sept. 15, 2023, 3:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On 9/15/23 00:04, Herve Codina wrote:
> Hi Lizhi
>
> On Thu, 14 Sep 2023 11:15:51 -0700
> Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com> wrote:
>
>> Destroy and free cset when failure happens.
>>
>> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
>> Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230911171319.495bb837@bootlin.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/of.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> index 2af64bcb7da3..67bbfa2fca59 100644
> Why this patch alone ?
> The issue fixed by this patch is related to the patch 2 in a series under review
>    https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/ZQGaSr+G5qu%2F8nJZ@smile.fi.intel.com/
> Is the patch 2 in this series already applied by some maintainers ?
Yes.
>
> You have to fix the patch in the series sending a new iteration of the series.
>
> This patch alone does not make sense.
>
> Otherwise, the modifications to fix the issue seem good.
>
> Regards,
> Hervé
>
>> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> @@ -663,7 +663,6 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   	np = of_changeset_create_node(cset, ppnode, name);
>>   	if (!np)
>>   		goto failed;
>> -	np->data = cset;
>>   
>>   	ret = of_pci_add_properties(pdev, cset, np);
>>   	if (ret)
>> @@ -673,12 +672,17 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>   	if (ret)
>>   		goto failed;
>>   
>> +	np->data = cset;
>>   	pdev->dev.of_node = np;
>>   	kfree(name);
>>   
>>   	return;
>>   
>>   failed:
>> +	if (cset) {
>> +		of_changeset_destroy(cset);
>> +		kfree(cset);
>> +	}
>>   	if (np)
>>   		of_node_put(np);
>>   	kfree(name);
Rob Herring (Arm) Sept. 15, 2023, 4:20 p.m. UTC | #3
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 1:16 PM Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com> wrote:
>
> Destroy and free cset when failure happens.
>
> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
> Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230911171319.495bb837@bootlin.com/
> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
> ---
>  drivers/pci/of.c | 6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> index 2af64bcb7da3..67bbfa2fca59 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> @@ -663,7 +663,6 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>         np = of_changeset_create_node(cset, ppnode, name);
>         if (!np)
>                 goto failed;
> -       np->data = cset;
>
>         ret = of_pci_add_properties(pdev, cset, np);
>         if (ret)
> @@ -673,12 +672,17 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>         if (ret)
>                 goto failed;
>
> +       np->data = cset;
>         pdev->dev.of_node = np;
>         kfree(name);
>
>         return;
>
>  failed:
> +       if (cset) {

Instead of adding more if's, use multiple goto labels which is the
normal cleanup style. Note that there's a new cleanup.h thing that can
do some automatic cleanups. Not sure if that works or helps here.

> +               of_changeset_destroy(cset);
> +               kfree(cset);
> +       }
>         if (np)
>                 of_node_put(np);
>         kfree(name);
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Lizhi Hou Sept. 15, 2023, 5:11 p.m. UTC | #4
On 9/15/23 09:20, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 1:16 PM Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com> wrote:
>> Destroy and free cset when failure happens.
>>
>> Fixes: 407d1a51921e ("PCI: Create device tree node for bridge")
>> Reported-by: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230911171319.495bb837@bootlin.com/
>> Signed-off-by: Lizhi Hou <lizhi.hou@amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/pci/of.c | 6 +++++-
>>   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> index 2af64bcb7da3..67bbfa2fca59 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
>> @@ -663,7 +663,6 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>          np = of_changeset_create_node(cset, ppnode, name);
>>          if (!np)
>>                  goto failed;
>> -       np->data = cset;
>>
>>          ret = of_pci_add_properties(pdev, cset, np);
>>          if (ret)
>> @@ -673,12 +672,17 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>>          if (ret)
>>                  goto failed;
>>
>> +       np->data = cset;
>>          pdev->dev.of_node = np;
>>          kfree(name);
>>
>>          return;
>>
>>   failed:
>> +       if (cset) {
> Instead of adding more if's, use multiple goto labels which is the
> normal cleanup style. Note that there's a new cleanup.h thing that can
> do some automatic cleanups. Not sure if that works or helps here.

Ok. I will create another patch to use multiple goto labels.


Lizhi

>
>> +               of_changeset_destroy(cset);
>> +               kfree(cset);
>> +       }
>>          if (np)
>>                  of_node_put(np);
>>          kfree(name);
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
index 2af64bcb7da3..67bbfa2fca59 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/of.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
@@ -663,7 +663,6 @@  void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	np = of_changeset_create_node(cset, ppnode, name);
 	if (!np)
 		goto failed;
-	np->data = cset;
 
 	ret = of_pci_add_properties(pdev, cset, np);
 	if (ret)
@@ -673,12 +672,17 @@  void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
 	if (ret)
 		goto failed;
 
+	np->data = cset;
 	pdev->dev.of_node = np;
 	kfree(name);
 
 	return;
 
 failed:
+	if (cset) {
+		of_changeset_destroy(cset);
+		kfree(cset);
+	}
 	if (np)
 		of_node_put(np);
 	kfree(name);